Usefulness of atosiban for tocolysis during external cephalic version: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Tài liệu tham khảo
Hickok, 1992, The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 166, 851, 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91347-D
Hannah, 2000, Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group, Lancet, 356, 1375, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3
Betran, 2016, Section WHOWGoC. WHO statement on caesarean section rates, BJOG, 123, 667, 10.1111/1471-0528.13526
Cole, 2003, Elective primary cesarean delivery, N Engl J Med, 348, 2364, 10.1056/NEJMc030837
Harer, 2013, Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life, Obstet Gynecol, 122, 156, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318298df23
Baxi, 2020, External cephalic version: ACOG practice bulletin number 221, Obstet Gynecol, 136, 634, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004076
Levin, 2020, Management of labor after external cephalic version, J Perinat Med
Riemma, 2020, Efficacy of hyoscine butyl-bromide in shortening the active phase of labor: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 252, 218, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.042
Lopez-Perez, 2020, Prediction model of success for external cephalic version. Complications and perinatal outcomes after a successful version, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 46, 2002, 10.1111/jog.14385
Cluver, 2015, Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Ochsenbein-Kolble, 2018, Tocolysis for in utero surgery: atosiban performs distinctly better than magnesium sulfate, Fetal Diagn Ther, 44, 59, 10.1159/000478261
van Vliet, 2016, Nifedipine versus atosiban for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL III): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 387, 2117, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00548-1
American College of O, 2016, Gynecologists’ committee on practice B-O. Practice bulletin No. 171: management of preterm labor, Obstet Gynecol, 128, e155, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001711
2017, External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of term breech presentation, Bjog Int J Obstet Gynaecol, 124, e178
Moher, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 1006, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
Higgins, 2011
Margulis, 2014, Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank, Clin Epidemiol, 6, 359, 10.2147/CLEP.S66677
Velzel, 2017, Atosiban versus fenoterol as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: randomised controlled trial, BMJ, 356, i6773, 10.1136/bmj.i6773
Couceiro Naveira, 2020, Atosiban versus ritodrine as tocolytics in external cephalic version, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 1
Burgos, 2010, Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study, J Perinat Med, 38, 23, 10.1515/jpm.2010.010
Stergiotou, 2007, The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 86, 927, 10.1080/00016340701343123
Magro-Malosso, 2016, Neuraxial analgesia to increase the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 215, 276, 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.036