Usefulness of atosiban for tocolysis during external cephalic version: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Gaetano Riemma1, Antonio Schiattarella1, Marco La Verde1, Stefano Cianci1, Fabiana Savoia1, Pasquale De Franciscis1, Luigi Cobellis, Nicola Colacurci1, Maddalena Morlando
1Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Hickok, 1992, The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 166, 851, 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91347-D Hannah, 2000, Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group, Lancet, 356, 1375, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3 Betran, 2016, Section WHOWGoC. WHO statement on caesarean section rates, BJOG, 123, 667, 10.1111/1471-0528.13526 Cole, 2003, Elective primary cesarean delivery, N Engl J Med, 348, 2364, 10.1056/NEJMc030837 Harer, 2013, Consequences of a primary elective cesarean delivery across the reproductive life, Obstet Gynecol, 122, 156, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318298df23 Baxi, 2020, External cephalic version: ACOG practice bulletin number 221, Obstet Gynecol, 136, 634, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004076 Levin, 2020, Management of labor after external cephalic version, J Perinat Med Riemma, 2020, Efficacy of hyoscine butyl-bromide in shortening the active phase of labor: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 252, 218, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.042 Lopez-Perez, 2020, Prediction model of success for external cephalic version. Complications and perinatal outcomes after a successful version, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 46, 2002, 10.1111/jog.14385 Cluver, 2015, Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version, Cochrane Database Syst Rev Ochsenbein-Kolble, 2018, Tocolysis for in utero surgery: atosiban performs distinctly better than magnesium sulfate, Fetal Diagn Ther, 44, 59, 10.1159/000478261 van Vliet, 2016, Nifedipine versus atosiban for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL III): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 387, 2117, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00548-1 American College of O, 2016, Gynecologists’ committee on practice B-O. Practice bulletin No. 171: management of preterm labor, Obstet Gynecol, 128, e155, 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001711 2017, External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of term breech presentation, Bjog Int J Obstet Gynaecol, 124, e178 Moher, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 1006, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 Higgins, 2011 Margulis, 2014, Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank, Clin Epidemiol, 6, 359, 10.2147/CLEP.S66677 Velzel, 2017, Atosiban versus fenoterol as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: randomised controlled trial, BMJ, 356, i6773, 10.1136/bmj.i6773 Couceiro Naveira, 2020, Atosiban versus ritodrine as tocolytics in external cephalic version, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 1 Burgos, 2010, Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study, J Perinat Med, 38, 23, 10.1515/jpm.2010.010 Stergiotou, 2007, The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 86, 927, 10.1080/00016340701343123 Magro-Malosso, 2016, Neuraxial analgesia to increase the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 215, 276, 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.036