Use phase and end-of-life modeling of biobased biodegradable plastics in life cycle assessment: a review

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 24 - Trang 3253-3272 - 2022
Katrin Molina-Besch1
1Division of Packaging Logistics, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Due to the negative environmental impacts along the life cycle of fossil-based plastics, there is an increased interest in the development of biobased and biodegradable plastics. Especially, biodegradable bioplastics possess different material characteristics than fossil-based plastics and can therefore be expected to perform differently during the product use and in end-of-life (EOL) phases. Thus, it is important to consider the material performance and behavior of biobased plastics in life cycle assessment studies. In practice, this is often a difficult task due to lack of data. The purpose of this review study is to analyze how contemporary LCA method models the use and EOL phases of biobased biodegradable plastics, with a specific focus on how the properties of these chemical novel materials are considered in LCA modeling. The first part of the review summarizes recommendations for the use phase and EOL modeling of biobased plastics. The second part analyzes 42 bioplastic LCAs in relation to these recommendations. The results of the review reveal that the use phase is commonly neglected in LCAs of bioplastics. Moreover, it is shown that EOL modeling in LCAs of biobased biodegradable plastics is often based on data that is non-specific for the analyzed material(s). The results of the review call for more research on the specific material properties of newly developed biobased biodegradable plastics, as these data are needed to decrease uncertainties in bioplastic LCAs.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amasawa E, Yamanishi T, Nakatani J, Hirao M, Sato S (2021) Climate change implications of bio-based and marine-biodegradable plastic: evidence from poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate). Environ Sci Technol 55:3380–3388 Beigbeder J, Soccalingame PD, Bénézet JC, Bergeret A (2019) How to manage biocomposites wastes end of life? A life cycle assessment approach (LCA) focused on polypropylene (PP)/wood flour and polylactic acid (PLA)/flax fibres biocomposites. Waste Manag 83:184–193 Benetto E, Jury C, Igos E, Carton HP, Vergne C, Di Martino J (2015) Using atmospheric plasma to design multilayer film from polylactic acid and thermoplastic starch: a screening life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 87:953–960 Bishop G, Styles D, Lens PNL (2021): Environmental performance comparison of bioplastics and petrochemical plastics: a review of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodological decisions. Resour Conserv Recycl 168 Bjørn A, Owsianiak M, Molin C, Laurent A (2018) Main characteristics of LCA. In: Hauschild M, Rosenbaum R, Olsen S (eds) Life cycle assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_2 Bohlmann GM (2004) Biodegradable packaging life-cycle assessment. Environ Prog 23:342–346 Brodin M, Vallejos M, Opedal MT, Area MC, Chinga-Carrasco G (2017) Lignocellulosics as sustainable resources for production of bioplastics—a review. J Clean Prod 162:646–664 Changwichan K, Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH (2018) Eco-efficiency assessment of bioplastics production systems and end-of-life options. Sustainability 10:952 Chen G-Q, Patel MK (2012) Plastics derived from biological sources: present and future: a technical and environmental review. Chem Rev 112:2082–2099 Choi B, Yoo S, Park S-I (2018) Carbon footprint of packaging films made from LDPE, PLA, and PLA/PBAT blends in South Korea. Sustainability 10:2369 Civancik-Uslu D, Ferrer L, Puig R, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2018) Are functional fillers improving environmental behavior of plastics? A review on LCA studies. Sci Total Environ 626:927–940 Cosate de Andrade MF, Souza PMS, Cavalett O, Morales AR (2016) Life cycle assessment of poly(lactic acid) (pla): comparison between chemical recycling, mechanical recycling and composting. J Polym Environ 24:372–384 Deng Y, Achten MJ, Van Acker K, Duflou JR (2013) Life cycle assessment of wheat gluten powder and derived packaging film. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 7:429–458 De la Caba K, Guerrero P, Trung TS, Cruz-Romero M, Kerry JP, Fluhr J et al (2019) From seafood waste to active seafood packaging: an emerging opportunity of the circular economy. J Clean Prod 208:86–98 Dietrich K, Dumont M-J, Del Rio LF, Orsat V (2017) Producing PHAs in the bioeconomy—towards a sustainable bioplastic. Sustain Prod and Consum 9:58–70 Dilkes-Hoffman LS, Lane JL, Grant T, Pratt S, Lant PA, Laycock B (2018) Environmental impact of biodegradable food packaging when considering food waste. J Clean Prod 180:325–334 Dilkes-Hoffman L, Ashworth P, Laycock B, Pratt S, Lant P (2019). Public attitudes towards bioplastics – knowledge, perception and end-of-life management. Resour Conserv Recycl 151 Eerhart AJJE, Faaij APC, Patel MK (2012) Replacing fossil based PET with biobased PEF; process analysis, energy and GHG balance. Energy Environ Sci 5:6407–6422 Escobar N, Haddad S, Börner J, Britz W (2018) Land use mediated GHG emissions and spillovers from increased consumption of bioplastics. Environ Res Lett 13:125005 Fagnani DE, Tami JL, Copley G, Clemons MN, Getzler YDYL, McNeil AJ (2021) 100th Anniversary of macromolecular science viewpoint: redefining sustainable polymers. ACS Macro Lett 41–53 Filiciotto L, Rothenberg G (2021) Biodegradable plastics: standards, policies, and impacts. Chemsuschem 14:56–72 Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv 3(7):e1700782 Gironi F, Piemonte V (2011) Bioplastics and petroleum-based plastics: strengths and weaknesses. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization Environ Effects 33:1949–1959 Guo M, Murphy RJ (2012) Is there a generic environmental advantage for starch–PVOH biopolymers over petrochemical polymers? J Polym Environ 20:976–990 Guo M, Trzcinski AP, Stuckey DC, Murphy RJ (2011) Anaerobic digestion of starch-polyvinyl alcohol biopolymer packaging: biodegradability and environmental impact assessment. Bioresour Technol 102:11137–11146 Hatti-Kaul R, Nilsson LJ, Zhang B, Rehnberg N, Lundmark S (2020) Designing biobased recyclable polymers for plastics. Trends Biotechnol 38:50–67 Haylock R, Rosentrater KA (2018) Cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of polylactic acid composites with traditional and bio-based fillers. J Polym Environ 26:1484–1503 Heimersson S, Morgan-Sagastume F, Peters GM, Werker A, Svanstrom M (2014) Methodological issues in life cycle assessment of mixed-culture polyhydroxyalkanoate production utilising waste as feedstock. New Biotechnol 31:383–393 Hermann BG, Blok K, Patel MK (2010) Twisting biomaterials around your little finger: environmental impacts of bio-based wrappings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:346–358 Hermann BG, Debeer L, De Wilde B, Blok K, Patel MK (2011) To compost or not to compost: carbon and energy footprints of biodegradable materials’ waste treatment. Polym Degrad Stab 96:1159–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.12.026 Hermansson F, Janssen M, Svanström M (2019) Prospective study of lignin-based and recycled carbon fibers in composites through meta-analysis of life cycle assessments. J Clean Product. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.022 Hottle TA, Bilec MM, Landis AE (2013) Sustainability assessments of bio-based polymers. Polym Degrad Stab 98:1898–1907 Hottle TA, Bilec MM, Landis AE (2017) Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 122:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.03.002 Ingrao C, Tricase C, Cholewa-Wójcik A, Kawecka A, Rana R, Siracusa V (2015) Polylactic acid trays for fresh-food packaging: a carbon footprint assessment. Sci Total Environ 537:385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.023 Khoo HH, Tan RBH (2010) Environmental impacts of conventional plastic and bio-based carrier bags: part 2: end-of-life options. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:338–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0163-8 Leceta I, Etxabide A, Cabezudo S, de la Caba K, Guerrero P (2014) Bio-based films prepared with by-products and wastes: environmental assessment. J Clean Product 64:218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.054 Leceta I, Guerrero P, Cabezudo S, Caba K (2013) Environmental assessment of chitosan-based films. J Clean Product 41:312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.049 Leejarkpai T, Mungcharoen T, Suwanmanee U (2016) Comparative assessment of global warming impact and eco-efficiency of PS (polystyrene), PET (polyethylene terephthalate) and PLA (polylactic acid) boxes. J Clean Product 125:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.029 Lorite GS, Rocha JM, Miilumäki N, Saavalainen P, Selkälä T, Morales-Cid G, Toth G (2017) Evaluation of physicochemical/microbial properties and life cycle assessment (LCA) of PLA-based nanocomposite active packaging. LWT 75:305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.09.004 Madival S, Auras R, Singh SP, Narayan R (2009) Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology. J Clean Product 17:1183–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.03.015 Maga D, Hiebel M, Thonemann N (2019) Life cycle assessment of recycling options for polylactic acid. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.018 MarILCA (n.d) Marine impacts in LCA. https://marilca.org/. Accessed May 2022 Mendes AC, Pedersen GA (2021) Perspectives on sustainable food packaging: Is bio-based plastics a solution? Trends Food Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.03.049 Ögmundarson Ó, Sukumara S, Laurent A, Fantke P (2020) Environmental hotspots of lactic acid production systems. GCB Bioenergy 12:19–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12652 Papong S, Malakul P, Trungkavashirakun R, Wenunun P, Chom-in T, Nithitanakul M, Sarobol E (2014) Comparative assessment of the environmental profile of PLA and PET drinking water bottles from a life cycle perspective. J Clean Product 65:539–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.030 Pawelzik P, Carus M, Hotchkiss J, Narayan R, Selke S, Wellisch M, Patel MK (2013) Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials—reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.006 Philp JC, Bartsev A, Ritchie RJ, Baucher MA, Guy K (2013) Bioplastics science from a policy vantage point. New Biotechnol 30:635–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2012.11.021 Piemonte V (2011) Bioplastic wastes: the best final disposition for energy saving. J Polym Environ 19:988–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0343-z Piemonte V, Gironi F (2011) Land-use change emissions: How green are the bioplastics? Environm Prog Sustain Energy 30:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10518 Pietrini M, Roes L, Patel MK, Chiellini E (2007) Comparative life cycle studies on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-based composites as potential replacement for conventional petrochemical plastics. Biomacromol 8:2210–2218. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0700892 Razza F, Degli Innocenti F, Dobon A, Aliaga C, Sanchez C, Hortal M (2015) Environmental profile of a bio-based and biodegradable foamed packaging prototype in comparison with the current benchmark. J Clean Product 102:493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.033 Ribeiro I, Peças P, Henriques E (2013) A life cycle framework to support materials selection for Ecodesign: a case study on biodegradable polymers. Mater Des 51:300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.043 Rodriguez JL, Fabri S, Orrego CE, Owsianiak M (2020) Life cycle inventory data for banana-fiber-based biocomposite lids. Data Brief 30:105605 Rossi V, Cleeve-Edwards N, Lundquist L, Schenker U, Dubois C, Humbert S, Jolliet O (2015) Life cycle assessment of end-of-life options for two biodegradable packaging materials: sound application of the European waste hierarchy. J Clean Product 86:132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.049 Saibuatrong W, Cheroennet N, Suwanmanee U (2017) Life cycle assessment focusing on the waste management of conventional and bio-based garbage bags. J Clean Product 158:319–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.006 Salwa HN, Sapuan SM, Mastura MT, Zuhri MYM (2020) Life cycle assessment of sugar palm fiber reinforced-sago biopolymer composite takeout food container. Appl Sci 10(22):7951 Schmehl M, Müssig J, Schönfeld U, Von Buttlar HB (2008) Life cycle assessment on a bus body component based on hemp fiber and PTP®. J Polym Environ 16:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-008-0103-x Spierling S, Knüpffer E, Behnsen H, Mudersbach M, Krieg H, Springer S, Endres HJ (2018a) Bio-based plastics—a review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments. J Clean Product. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.014 Spierling S, Röttger C, Venkatachalam V, Mudersbach M, Herrmann C, Endres HJ (2018b) Bio-based plastics—A building block for the circular economy? In: Paper presented at the Procedia CIRP Spierling S, Venkatachalam V, Mudersbach M, Becker N, Herrmann C, Endres HJ (2020) End-of-life options for bio-based plastics in a circular economy-status quo and potential from a life cycle assessment perspective. Resources. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9070090 Tadele D, Roy P, DefershaF MM, Mohanty AK (2020) A comparative life-cycle assessment of talc- and biochar-reinforced composites for lightweight automotive parts. Clean Technol Environ Policy 22:639–649 Tecchio P, Freni P, De Benedetti B, Fenouillot F (2016) Ex-ante Life Cycle Assessment approach developed for a case study on bio-based polybutylene succinate. J Clean Product 112:316–325 Uihlein A, Ehrenberger S, Schebek L (2008) Utilisation options of renewable resources: a life cycle assessment of selected products. J Clean Product 16:1306–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.06.009 Van der Harst E, Potting J, Kroeze C (2014) Multiple data sets and modelling choices in a comparative LCA of disposable beverage cups. Sci Total Environ 494–495:129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.084 Vercalsteren A, Spirinckx C, Geerken T (2010) Life cycle assessment and eco-efficiency analysis of drinking cups used at public events. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0143-z Venkatachalam V, Spierling S, Horn R, Endres HJ (2018) LCA and eco-design: consequential and attributional approaches for bio-based plastics. Procedia CIRP 69:579–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.086 Vidal R, Martinez P, Mulet E, Gonzalez R, Lopez-Mesa B, Fowler P, Fang JM (2007) Environmental assessment of biodegradable multilayer film derived from carbohydrate polymers. J Polym Environ 15:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-007-0056-5 Vilaplana F, Stromberg E, Karlsson S (2010) Environmental and resource aspects of sustainable biocomposites. Polym Degrad Stabil 95:2147–2161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.016 Weiss M, Haufe J, Carus M, Brandão M, Bringezu S, Hermann B, Patel MK (2012) A review of the environmental impacts of biobased materials. J Ind Ecol 16:S169–S181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00468.x Yano J, Hirai Y, Sakai S, Tsubota J (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions from the treatment of household plastic containers and packaging: replacement with biomass-based materials. Waste Manag Res J Int Solid Wastes Public Clean Assoc ISWA 32:304–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X14525820 Yates MR, Barlow CY (2013) Life cycle assessments of biodegradable, commercial biopolymers—a critical review. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.06.010 Zhu J, Wang C (2020) Biodegradable plastics: Green hope or greenwashing? Mar Pollut Bull. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111774