Use of telemedicine by practising allergists before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Allergo Journal International - Tập 30 - Trang 193-197 - 2021
Stephanie Dramburg1, Paolo Maria Matricardi1, Ingrid Casper2, Ludger Klimek2
1Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology, and Critical Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2Centre for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany

Tóm tắt

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic presented unprecedented challenges to both inpatient and outpatient care. In order to maintain good care under necessary contact restrictions, especially in the outpatient sector, the use of telemedical applications was demanded and promoted. The exploratory survey among members of the Association of German Allergists (AeDA) was intended to show how these were received among allergists in private practice. The survey was restricted to actively practising members of the AeDA who had previously given their consent to receive such surveys (n = 437). They were invited by email to participate in a survey on the topic of “Telemedicine in everyday clinical practice in allergology”. The survey included quantitative and qualitative questions on the use of telemedicine services before and during the pandemic and was conducted anonymously on the SoSci Survey platform. Participation was possible in the period from June to August 2020. In all, 76 specialists with additional qualification in allergology took part in the survey. Of these, 71 completed the full questionnaire. Before the start of the pandemic-related contact restrictions, 46.5% (33/71) stated that they had used telemedicine in their clinical practice. This number increased to 73.2% (52/71) after 31 January 2020. The largest increase (4.3% vs. 15.6%) was seen in the area of video consultations. Furthermore, 43/76 participants can imagine integrating telemedicine services into their daily clinical routine in the future. The use of telemedical services, especially video consultations, increased significantly during the SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic in Germany. The majority of respondents perceive the implementation as positive and can imagine continuing to use telemedical methods after the end of the pandemic.

Tài liệu tham khảo

KVB with the support of the KVB Scientific Advisory Board. Position paper: End the medical shutdown—get the use of outpatient care in Bavaria back on track quickly! 2020. https://www.kvb.de/presse/statements/revitalisierung-der-ambulanten-versorgung-in-bayern. Accessed 30 May 2021. German Medical Association. Notes and explanations on § 7 Para. 4 MBO-Ä—Treatment in personal contact and remote treatment. Dtsch Arztebl. 2019;116:A–978 / B–810 / C–798. KVB. Service for practices: video consultation. https://www.kbv.de/html/videosprechstunde.php. Accessed 30 May 2021. KVB. List of certified video service providers. https://www.kbv.de/media/sp/Liste_zertifizierte-Videodienstanbieter.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2021. KVB. Videosprechstunde: Übersicht zur Vergütung.. https://www.kbv.de/media/sp/Videosprechstunde__uebersicht_Verguetung.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2021. Stiftung Gesundheit, Health Innovation Hub. Physicians in the future market of health 2020: physician work and use of video consultation hours during the Covid 19 pandemic. 2020. https://www.stiftung-gesundheit.de/pdf/studien/aerzte-im-zukunftsmarkt-gesundheit_2020.pdf;. Accessed 14 Dec 2020. Peine A, Paffenholz P, Martin L, Dohmen S, Marx G, Loosen SH. Telemedicine in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic: multi-professional national survey. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e19745. SoSci Survey GmbH. Online survey. https://www.soscisurvey.de. Accessed 30 May 2021. Wolf T. Coordination office telemedicine Baden-Württemberg. Liability in case of breach of medical duty of care.. https://www.telemedbw.de/FAQ-Haftung/haftung-bei-verstoss-gegen-aerztliche-sorgfaltspflicht;. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.