Usability professionals—current practices and future development

Interacting with Computers - Tập 18 - Trang 568-600 - 2006
Jan Gulliksen1, Inger Boivie1, Bengt Göransson2
1Department for IT/HCI, Uppsala University, PO Box 337, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden
2Guide Redina AB, Smedsgränd 9, SE-753 20 Uppsala, Sweden

Tài liệu tham khảo

Åborg, C., 2002. How does IT feel @ work—and how to make IT better. PhD Thesis, Uppsala University, Sweden. ACM Special Interest Group on Computer–Human Interaction (SIGCHI) Curriculum Development Group, 1992. Technical Report. ACM, New York. Agile Alliance, Manifesto for Agile Software Development, 2001. Available: http://www.agilealliance.org. Atwood, M.E., McCain, K.W., Williams, J.C., 2002. How does the design community think about design? In: Proceedings of DIS2002, London, 2002, pp. 125–132. Bannon, 1991, From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human–computer interacting studies in systems design, 25 Beath, 1994, The contradictory structure of systems development methodologies: deconsturcting the IS–user relationship in information engineering, Information Systems Research, 5, 350, 10.1287/isre.5.4.350 Bevan, N., 2003. Accreditation of usability professionals. In: Proceedings of HCI International, vol. 1, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 429–433. Bevan, N., Earthy, J., Jarrett, C., 2002. Building the usability professionals certification scheme: where next? In: Proceedings of the 1st European Usability Professionals Conference, September 2002. British Computer Society. Beyer, 1998 Blomkvist, 2005, Towards a model for bridging agile development and user-centered design Bødker, 1998, Understanding representation in design, Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 107, 10.1207/s15327051hci1302_1 Boivie, I., 2003. Usability and Users', Health Issues in Systems Development. IT Licentiate Theses 2003-003. Uppsala University, Uppsala, 2003. Boivie, 2003, Why usability gets lost or usability in in-house software development, Interacting with Computers, 15, 623, 10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00055-9 Boivie, I., Gulliksen, J., Göransson, B., (in this issue) The lonesome cowboy—A study of the usability designer role in systems development. Interacting with Computers?. Chesney, 2004, Communication and co-ordination practices in software engineering projects, Information and Software Technology, 46, 473, 10.1016/j.infsof.2003.10.001 Clark, 1996 Clegg, 1997, Information technology: a study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors, Ergonomics, 40, 851, 10.1080/001401397187694 Clemmensen, 2002, vol. 2, 859 Cockburn, 2002 Constantine, 1999 Constantine, 2002, Usage-centered engineering for web applications, IEEE Software, 19, 42, 10.1109/52.991331 Cooper, 1999 Curtis, 1988, A field study of the software design process for large systems, Communications of the ACM, 31, 1268, 10.1145/50087.50089 Diaper, D., in this issue. Tasks For and Tasks In Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting with Computers, 16. Diaper, 1992, Task analysis and systems analysis for software engineering, Interacting with Computers, 4, 124, 10.1016/0953-5438(92)90016-9 Donahue, 2001, Usability and the bottom line, IEE Software, 31, 10.1109/52.903161 Ehn, 1988 Fällman, D., 2003. Design-oriented human–computer interaction. In: Proceedings of CHI, 5(1), 2003, pp. 225–232. Faulkner, 2000, Usability Engineering, Palgrave Ferre, 2005, Improving the software process with usability aspects Fishman, Daniel, B. (1999). The case for Pragmatic Psychology. New York University Press. New York, the US. Fowler, 1997, UML Distilled Gould, 1997, How to design usable systems, 231 Göransson and Sandbäck, 1999. Usability designers improve the user‐centred design process. In: Brewser, S., Cawsey, A., Cockton, G. (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT ’99, vol. II. Edinburg press, Edinburg. Göransson, 2003, The usability design process — integrating user-centered systems design in the software development process, Software Process Improvement and Practice, 8, 111, 10.1002/spip.174 Göransson, 2003, Usability design—extending Rational Unified Process with a new discipline, 316 Greenbaum, 1990, The head and the heart: using gender analysis to study the social construction of computer systems, Computers &Society, 20, 9 Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M. (Eds.), 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside. Grudin, 1991, A Interactive systems: bridging the gaps between developers and users, IEEE Computer, 24, 59, 10.1109/2.76263 Grudin, 1991, Obstacles to user involvement in software product development, with implications for CSCW, International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 34, 435, 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90029-7 Gulliksen, 2003, Key principles for user-centred systems design, Behaviour & Information Technology, special section on Designing IT for Healthy Work, 22, 397, 10.1080/01449290310001624329 Gulliksen, 2004, Making a difference—a survey of the usability profession Gunther, R., Janis, J., Butler, S., 2004. The UCD Decision Matrix: How, When, and Where to Sell User-Centered Design into the Development Cycle. Available: http://www.ovostudios.com/upa2001/, (accessed on January 27, 2004). Harris, 1999, Better mythology for system design, vol. 1 Human Factors International, HFI Certified Usability Analyst™, 2004, Available:http://www.humanfactors.com/training/certification.asp(accessed on July 7, 2004). ISO/IS 9241-10, 1996. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals—Part 10. Dialogue Principles. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva. ISO/IS 9241-11, 1998. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals—Part 11. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO/IS 13407, 1999. Human-centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO/TR 18529, 2000. Ergonomics of Human–system Interaction—Human-centred Lifecycle Process Description. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Jacobson, 1999 Jerome, 2005, Surveying the solitudes: an investigation into the relationships between human computer interaction and software engineering in practice Jones, 1981 Karat, 1996, User centered design: quality or quackery?, Interactions, 10.1145/234813.234814 Katzeff, C., & Svärd, P.O., 1996. In search of key factors for usability maturity. Proc. of HCI ’96. Lewis, 1990, A research agenda for the nineties in human–computer interaction, Human Computer Interaction, 5, 125, 10.1207/s15327051hci0502&3_1 Lindegaard, 2002, Deconstructing silos: the business value of usability in the 21st Century, 3 Long, 1989, Conceptions of the discipline of HCI: craft, applied science, and engineering Löwgren, 1999, Design methodology and design practice, Interact, 13, 10.1145/291224.291233 Markensten, E., Artman, H., 2004. Procuring usable systems using personas. Proceedings of NordiCHI’04. Tampere. Mayhew, 1999 McCoy, 2002, Usability gaining a competitive edge, 283 Meads, 2002, Laid-off usability engineer, or why we don't get no respect, Interactions, 13, 10.1145/506671.506680 Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Stage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA, the US. Muller, M.J., Carey, K., 2002. Design as a minority discipline in a software company: toward requirements for a community of practice. In: Proceedings of CHI 2002. ACM Press. Nielsen, 1993 Nielsen, J., 2003. Return on Investment for Usability, Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox, January 7. Norman, 1986, Cognitive engineering Norman, D.A., 1999. Organisational Limits to HCI. Interview session. Donald Norman and Janice Rohn interviewed by Richard Anderson. In: Proceedings of CHI ‘99, Pittsburgh. Nyce, 1995, Towards foundational analysis in human-computer interaction Nygren, 1992, The Art of the Obvious. Automatically processed components of the task of reading frequently used documents. Implications for task analysis and interface design, 235 Öhman Persson, J., 2004. The Obvious & the Essential —Interpreting Software Development and Organizational Change. Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis. Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and technology 57. Poltrock, 1994, Organizational obstacles to interface design and development:two participant observer studies, ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 1, 52, 10.1145/174630.174633 Rational Software Corporation, Rational Unified Process, 2003, On-line version 2003.06.00.65. Rauch, 1995, UPA and CHI Surveys on usability processes, SIGCHI Bulletin, 27, 23, 10.1145/221296.221303 Rosenbaum, S., Rohn, J.A., Humburg, J., 2000. A toolkit for strategic usability: results from workshops, panels, and surveys. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, vol.1, pp. 337–344. Rosson, 2002 Sachs, 1995, Transforming work: collaboration, learning and design, Transactions of the ACM, 38, 36, 10.1145/223248.223258 Schackel, 1984, The concept of usability Schaffer, 2004 Schön, 1995 Siegel, 2003, Living on the edges: user-centered design and the dynamics of specialization in organizations, Interactions, X.5., 19 Sommerville, 1992 Spinuzzi, C., 2002. A Scandinavian challenge, a US response: methodological assumptions in Scandinavian and US prototyping approaches. In: Proceedings of SIGDOC’02, Toronto, pp. 208–215. Swedish Work Environment Authority, 2001. The Work Environment Act. Available at http://www.av.se/english/legislation/legislation.shtm. Symon, G. (1998). The work of IT system developers in context: an organizational case study. Human-Computer Interaction 13(1), 37–71. Vredenburg, K., Mao, J., Smith, P.W., Carey, T., 2002. A survey of user—centered design practice. In: Proceedings of CHI 2002, CHI Letters, 4(1), 2002, pp. 471–478. Wallace, 1993, Approaches to interface design, Interacting with Computers, 5, 259, 10.1016/0953-5438(93)90010-Q Wilson, 1996, Cost and benefits of user involvement in design: Practitioners’ views, 221 Wilson, 1997, vol. 1, 178