Urinary mercury concentrations associated with dental restorations in adult women aged 16–49 years: United States, 1999–2000

Occupational and Environmental Medicine - Tập 62 Số 6 - Trang 368-375 - 2005
Bruce A. Dye1, Susan E. Schober, Charles Dillon, Rebecca L. Jones, Cheryl D. Fryar, Margaret McDowell, T Sinks
1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA. [email protected]

Tóm tắt

Background:Mercury amalgam dental restorations have been used by dentists since the mid 19th century and issues on safety continue to be periodically debated within the scientific and public health communities. Previous studies have reported a positive association between urine mercury levels and the number of dental amalgams, but this relation has never been described in a nationally representative sample in the United States.

Aims and Methods:Using household interview, dietary interview, dental examination, and laboratory data from the 1999–2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the association between mercury concentrations and dental restorations was examined in US women of reproductive age.

Results:In women of childbearing age, approximately 13% of all posterior dental surfaces were restored with amalgams and the average urinary mercury level in women was low (1.34 μg/l). It is estimated that an increase of 1.8 μg/l in the log transformed values for mercury in urine would occur for each 10 dental surfaces restored with amalgam.

Conclusions:Although the findings do not address the important issues of adverse health effects at low thresholds of mercury exposure, they do provide important reference data that should contribute significantly to the ongoing scientific and public health policy debate on the use of dental amalgams in the USA.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Dental amalgam: a scientific review and recommended Public Health strategy for research, education, and regulation. Washington, DC: DHHS, PHS, 1993.

1994, J Am Dent Assoc, 125, 381, 10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0055

1998, J Am Dent Assoc, 129, 494, 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0252

US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Docket No. 03N-0169. http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/03-11648.html, 2003 (accessed 27 May 2003).

10.1056/NEJMra022471

World Health Organisation (WHO). Environmental Health Criteria 118. Inorganic mercury. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1991.

World Health Organisation. Mercury. In: Air quality guidelines, 2nd edn. Copenhagen, Regional Office for Europe, 2000 (http://www.who.dk/air/Activities/20020620_1).

National Academy of Sciences. Toxicological effects of methyl mercury. Washington, DC: National Research Council, 2000.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Public health statement for mercury. 1999. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/phs46.html (accessed 22 December 2003).

10.1146/annurev.pu.04.050183.002111

Miettinen JK. Absorption and elimination of dietary Hg++ and methyl mercury in man. In: Miller MW, Clarkson TW, eds. Mercury, mercurial, and mercaptans. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas, 1973:233–46.

10.1177/00220345850640080901

1992, Scand J Dent Res, 100, 354

10.1177/00220345960750011301

1997, Eur J Oral Sci, 105, 251, 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00208.x

1999, Am J Dent, 12, 227

2000, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 89, 216, 10.1067/moe.2000.102160

1987, Swed Dent J, 11, 179

Clarkson TW, Friberg L, Hursh JB, et al. The prediction of intake of mercury vapor from amalgams. In: Clarkson TW, Friberg L, Nordberg GF, Sager PR, eds. Biological monitoring of toxic metals. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.

1994, Arch Environ Health, 49, 384, 10.1080/00039896.1994.9954991

1998, Environ Res, 77, 115, 10.1006/enrs.1998.3829

1998, Arch Environ Health, 53, 205, 10.1080/00039899809605697

10.1006/taap.1998.8400

10.1177/00220345980770030501

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH), Division of Laboratory Sciences, Inorganic Toxicology and Nutrition Branch. Laboratory procedure manual: urine mercury. August 2001.

10.1001/jama.289.13.1667

1999, Alcohol Research and Health, 23, 5

2000, Am J Clin Nutr, 72, 796, 10.1093/ajcn/72.3.796

Beckman Instruments. Beckman Synchron CX3 clinical system, operating and services instruction. Beckman Instruments, Inc., 200 South Kraemer Blvd, Brea, CA 92621, 2000.

10.1177/00220345870660061701

10.1007/BF00380782

10.1177/096032719701601107

1990, J Dent Res, 70, 233

1998, G Ital Med Lav Erg, 20, 75

US Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury Study Report to Congress. Vol I, Executive Summary. Pub No. EPA-452/R-97-003. Washington: EPA, 1997.

10.1177/00220345890680050501

2000, Environ Res, 84, 186, 10.1006/enrs.2000.4098

1998, Environ Res, 77, 124, 10.1006/enrs.1997.3813

10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.37

10.1016/S0946-672X(00)80035-8

10.1080/009841000156510

10.1016/0892-0362(94)00049-J

10.1007/BF00381563

1971, Environ Lett, 1, 231, 10.1080/00139307109434987

1976, Tohoku J Exp Med, 119, 353, 10.1620/tjem.119.353

10.1093/chromsci/39.5.195