Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees?

Alemdag IS (1984) Total tree and merchantable stem biomass equations for Ontario hardwoods. Information Report PI-X-46. Agriculture Canada, Petawawa National Forestry Institute

Alden HA (1995) Hardwoods of North America. FPL-GTR-83. USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI

Araújo TM, Higuchi N, Andrade de Carvalho Jr J (1999) Comparison of formulae for biomass content in a tropical rain forest site in the state of Para, Brazil. For Ecol Manag 117(1–3):43–52

Baker LA, Hartzheim PM, Hobbie SE, King JY, Nelson KC (2007) Effect of consumption choices on fluxes of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus through households. Urban Ecosyst 10(2):97–117

Bickelhaupt D, Leaf A, Richards N (1973) Effect of branching habit on above-ground dry weight estimates of Acer saccharum stands. In: Young H (ed) IUFRO biomass stuies, Nancy, France and Vancouver, BC. University of Maine, College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, Orono, ME, pp 219–230

Brenneman DF, Gardner W, Schoenhofen L, Marsh P (1978) Biomass of species and stands of West Virginia hardwoods. In: Pope P (ed) Proceedings, central hardwood conference II; 1978 November 14–16. West Lafayette, IN, Purdue University, pp 159–178

Bunce RGH (1968) Biomass and production of trees in a mixed deciduous woodland I. Girth and height as parameters for the estimation of tree dry weight. J Ecol 56:759–775

Celestian SB, Martin CA (2005) Effects of parking lot location on size and physiology of four southwestern U.S. landscape trees. J Arboric 31(4):191–251

Clark A III, Phillips DR, Fredrick DJ (1985) Weight, Volume, and Physical Properties of Major Hardwood Species in the Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plains. RP SE-250. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Ashville, NC

Clark NA, Wynne RH, Schmoldt DL (2000) A review of past research on dendrometers. For Sci 46(4):570–576

Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW, Chambers JQ, Thomlinson JR, Ni J (2001) Measuring net primary production in forests: Concepts and field methods. Ecol Appl 11(2):356–370

Close RE, Nguyen PV, Kieblaso JJ (1996a) Urban vs. natural sugar maple growth: I. Stress symptoms and phenology in relation to site characteristics. J Arboric 22(3):144–150

Close RE, Kieblaso JJ, Nguyen PV, Schutzki RE (1996b) Urban vs. natural sugar maple growth: II. Water relations. J Arboric 22(4):187–192

Golubiewski NE (2006) Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: Effects of landscaping in Colorado’s Front Range. Ecol Appl 16(2):555–571

Hahn JT (1984) Tree volume and biomass equations for the lake states. Research Paper NC-250. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN

Harris W, Goldstein R, Henderson G (1973) Analysis of forest biomass pool, annual primary production and turnover of biomass for a mixed deciduous watershed. In: Young H (ed) IUFRO biomass studies, Nancy, France and Vancouver, BC. University of Maine, College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, Orono, ME, pp 41–64

Hepp TE, Brister GH (1982) Estimating crown biomass in loblolly pine plantations in the Carolina flatwoods. For Sci 28:115–127

Imhoff ML, Bounoua L, DeFries R, Lawrence T, Stutzer D, Tucker CJ, Ricketts T (2004) The consequences of urban land transformation on net primary productivity in the United States. Remote Sens of Environ, 89:434–443

Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49(1):12–35

Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2004) Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species. GTR NE-319. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA

Jo H-K, McPherson EG (2001) Indirect carbon reduction by residential vegetation and planting strategies in Chicago, USA. J Environ Manag 61:165–177

Kaye JP, McCulley RL, Burke IC (2005) Carbon fluxes, nitrogen cycling, and soil microbial communities in adjacent urban, native and agriculture ecosystems. Globl Chang Biol 11:575–587

Ketterings QM, Coe R, van Noordwijk M, Ambagau Y, Palm CA (2001) Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For Ecol Manag 146(1–3):199–209

Kramer PJ, Kozlowski TT (1979) Physiology of Plants. Academic Press, San Diego Ca, p 495

Lefsky MA, McHale MR (2008) Volume estimates of trees with complex architecture from terrestrial laser scanning. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 2(1):023521

Madgwick HAI, Satoo T (1975) On estimating aboveground weights of tree stands. Ecology 56:1446–1450

McPherson EG (1998) Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Sacramento’s urban forest. J Arboric 24(4):215–223

McPherson EG, Simpson JR (2001) Carbon dioxide reductions through urban forestry: guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters. PSW GTR-171. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Center for Urban Forest Research, Albany, CA

McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Xiao Q, Peper PJ, Maco SE (2003) Benefit-Cost Analysis of Fort Collins’ Municipal Forest. Internal Report. CUFR-2. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Center for Urban Forest Research

McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Peper PF (2005) Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities. J For 103:411–416

Nowak DJ (1994) Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago’s urban forest. In: McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA (eds) Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA, pp 83–94

Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2000) The urban forest effects (UFORE) model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions. In: Hansen M, Burk T (eds) Integrated tools for natural resources inventories in the 21st century: proceedings of the IUFRO conference; 1998 August 16–20; Boise, ID. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-212. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, pp 714–720

Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Ibarra M (2002) Brooklyn’s Urban Forest. GTR NE-290. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station., Newtown Square, PA

Nyakuengama JG, Downes GM, Ng J (2002) Growth and wood density responses to later-age fertilizer application in Pinus radiata. IAWA Journal 23(4):431–448

Parresol BR (1999) Assessing tree and stand biomass: A review with examples and critical comparisons. For Sci 45(4):573–593

Pastor J, Aber JD, Melillo JM (1984) Biomass prediction using generalized allometric regressions for some northeast tree species. For Ecol Manag 7(4):265–274

Pataki DE, Alig RJ, Fung AS, Golubiewski NE, Kennedy CA, McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Pouyat RV, Lankao PR (2006) Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Glob Chang Biol 12(11):2092–2102

Perala DA, Alban DH (1994) Allometric biomass estimators for Aspen-dominated ecosystems in the upper Great Lakes. Research Paper NC-314. USDA Forest Service, North Central Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN

Pillsbury NH, Reimer JL, Thompson RP (1998) Tree volume equations for fifteen urban species in California. Technical Report No. 7. Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute, California’s Polytech State University, San Luis Obsipo

Rhoades RW, Stipes RJ (1999) Growth of trees on Virginia Tech campus in response to various factors. J Arboric 25(4):211–217

Schlaegel BE (1984) Green ash volume and weight tables. Research Paper SO-206. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA

Standish JT, Manning G, Demaerschalk J (1985) Development of biomass equations for British Columbia tree species. Information Report BC-X-254. Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forest Research Centre, Victoria, BC

Steingraeber DA (1982) Phenotypic plasticity of branching patter in sugar maple (Acer saccharum). Am J Bot.69(4):638–640

Ter-Mikaelian MT, Korzukhin MD (1997) Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For Ecol Manag 97(1):1–24

Tritton LM, Hornbeck JW (1982) Biomass equations for major tree species of the Northeast. GTR NE-69. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, PA

Van Laar A, Akca A (1997) Forest Mensuration. Cuvillier Verlag, Gottingen, Germany, p 418

Williams RA, McClenahen JR (1984) Biomass prediction equations for seedlings, sprouts, and saplings of 10 central hardwood species. For Sci 30(2):523–527

Young HE, Ribe JH, Wainwright K (1980) Weight tables for tree and shrub species in Maine. Miscellaneous Report 230, Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment Station, University of Maine at Orono, Orono, Maine, USA