Upscaling of Elastic Properties in Carbonates: A Modeling Approach Based on a Multiscale Geophysical Data Set

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth - Tập 124 Số 12 - Trang 13021-13038 - 2019
Cédric Bailly1,2, J. Fortin2, M. Adelinet1, Youri Hamon1
1IFP Energies nouvelles, Direction Géosciences, 1 et 4 Avenue de Bois‐Préau Rueil‐Malmaison Cedex France
2Laboratoire de Géologie, Ecole normale supérieure/CNRS UMR8538, PSL Research University, Paris, France

Tóm tắt

AbstractLinking ultrasonic measurements made on samples, with sonic logs and seismic subsurface data, is a key challenge for the understanding of carbonate reservoirs. To deal with this problem, we investigate the elastic properties of dry lacustrine carbonates. At one study site, we perform a seismic refraction survey (100 Hz), as well as “sonic” (54 kHz) and ultrasonic (250 kHz) measurements directly on outcrop and ultrasonic measurements on samples (500 kHz). By comparing the median of each data set, we show that the P wave velocity decreases from laboratory to seismic scale. Nevertheless, the median of the sonic measurements acquired on outcrop surfaces seems to fit with the seismic data, meaning that sonic acquisition may be representative of seismic scale. To explain the variations due to upscaling, we relate the concept of representative elementary volume with the wavelength of each scale of study. Indeed, with upscaling, the wavelength varies from millimetric to pluri‐metric. This change of scale allows us to conclude that the behavior of P wave velocity is due to different geological features (matrix porosity, cracks, and fractures) related to the different wavelengths used. Based on effective medium theory, we quantify the pore aspect ratio at sample scale and the crack/fracture density at outcrop and seismic scales using a multiscale representative elementary volume concept. Results show that the matrix porosity that controls the ultrasonic P wave velocities is progressively lost with upscaling, implying that crack and fracture porosity impacts sonic and seismic P wave velocities, a result of paramount importance for seismic interpretation based on deterministic approaches.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1190/1.2358494

10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.10.009

10.1016/j.tecto.2010.10.012

Al‐Chalabi M., 2014, Principles of seismic velocities and time‐to‐depth conversion, 491, 10.3997/9789462820098

10.1007/BF00998333

10.1190/1.2967554

10.1190/1.1926808

10.1093/gji/ggz365

10.5281/zenodo.3551111

Bear J., 1972, Dynamics of fluids in porous media, 784 pp

10.1016/0167‐6636(87)90005‐6

10.1002/2016JB013816

Bourbié T., 1987, Acoustics of porous media

10.3390/min9040203

Claes S., 2015, Pore classification and upscaling strategy in travertine reservoir rocks, 119

Corbett P. W. M., 2009, Petroleum geoengineering: Integration of static and dynamic models, 100, 10.1190/1.9781560801597

10.1144/sp418.9

10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.11.001

10.1016/j.ijengsci.2011.02.001

10.1190/1.1599691

10.1029/2005JB004005

10.1190/geo2011‐0047.1

10.1016/j.sedgeo.2014.04.008

10.1306/10181717058

10.2118/10976‐pa

10.1016/j.tecto.2012.05.012

10.1190/1.9781560802099.ch5

10.1016/j.tecto.2014.10.020

10.1017/CBO9780511626753

10.1029/JB088iB03p02345

Nordahl K., 2004, A petrophysical evaluation of tidal heterolithic deposits: Application of a near wellbore model for reconciliation of scale dependant well data, 338

10.1007/s11004‐008‐9182‐4

10.1007/s10933‐011‐9530‐0

10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.01.043

Raymer L. L., 1980, SPWLA 21st Annual Logging Symposium, 1

10.1190/geo2017‐0344.1

10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.02.022

10.1002/2014JB011313

10.1016/S0191‐8141(99)00108‐X

Ringrose P., 2015, Reservoir model design: A practiotioner's guide, 249, 10.1007/978-94-007-5497-3

10.1144/SP309.9

Sheriff R. E., 2002, Encyclopedic dictionary of exploration geophysics, 442, 10.1190/1.9781560802969

10.1017/CBO9781139168359

10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.004

10.1016/0037‐0738

10.1029/JB084iB02p00672

10.1190/1.2831935

10.1029/jz070i002p00381

10.2118/91‐02‐09

10.1016/S0016-6995(84)80020-0

10.1190/geo2017‐0293.1

10.1190/1.1438217

10.1190/1.3064148