Upgrading academic scholarship: challenges and chances of the digital age

RudiSchmiede1
1Department of Sociology, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss what the beginning of the Internet Age means for the functions and structures of scholarly information and communication by looking at and evaluating today's usability and usage of the digital information infrastructure for and by academic scholarship.Design/methodology/approachThe paper gives an overview of the current state of development of digital information in the scholarly cultures and stresses the importance of data as the crucial – and considerably extended – basis of scholarly work. The central role of the publishing world for the academic rewards system is analyzed to consider continuities and discontinuities in scholarly publication.FindingsThe paper advances the thesis first coined by Christine Borgman that today we have an information infrastructure of, but not for, scholarly information. Some ideas and proposals of what should be done to move towards an information infrastructure for scholarly work conclude the paper.Originality/valueThe paper tries to bridge the gap between information professionals as producers and scholars as users of information and communication technologies and shows that a joint debate on these issues is necessary.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bell, D. (1973), The Coming of Post‐Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting, Basic Books, New York, NY.

Borgman, C.L. (2003), From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure. Access to Information in the Networked World, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London.

Borgman, C.L. (2007), Scholarship in the Digital Age. Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London.

Henry, G. (2003), “Online publishing in the 21st century. Challenges and opportunities”, D‐Lib Magazine, Vol. 9 No. 10, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/october03/henry/10henry.html (accessed 22 May 2009).

Hohlmann, B. (2007), Organisation SAP – Soziale Auswirkungen technischer Systeme, Shaker‐Verlag, Aachen.

Kay, A. (1971), “The best way to predict the future is to invent it”, available at: www.smalltalk.org/alankay.html (accessed 22 May 2009).

Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post‐critical Philosophy, Routledge, London.

Schmiede, R. (2005), “Scientific work and the usage of digital scientific information – some notes on structures, discrepancies, tendencies, and strategies”, in Hemmje, M., Niederee, C. and Risse, T. (Eds), From Integrated Publication and Information Systems to Virtual Information and Knowledge Environments. Essays Dedicated to Erich J. Neuhold on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, NY, pp. 107‐16, available at: www.ifs.tu‐darmstadt.de/fileadmin/soziologie/Schmiede_Publikationen/NeuholdFSkorr_041208.pdf (accessed 22 May 2009).

Schmiede, R. (2006), “Knowledge, work and subject in informational capitalism”, in Berleur, J., Nurminen, M.I. and Impagliazzo, J. (Eds), Social Informatics – An Information Society for All? In Remembrance of Rob Kling. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference “Human Choice and Computers”, IFIP‐TC9 ”Relationship between Computers and Society, Springer, Berlin, pp. 333‐54, available at: www.ifs.tu‐darmstadt.de/fileadmin/soziologie/Schmiede_Publikationen/C70‐Knowledge‐Work‐Subject‐InfCapit_060623.pdf (accessed 22 May 2009).

Schmiede, R. (2008), “Acatech diskutiert: Auf dem Weg in die Google‐Gesellschaft?”, in Mattern, F. (Ed.), Wie arbeiten die Suchmaschinen von morgen? Informationstechnische, politische und ökonomische Perspektiven, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 127‐33.

Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. (2008), “Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns”, D‐Lib Magazine, Vol. 14 No. 11/12, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/november08/tenopir/11tenopir.html (accessed 22 May 2009).

van de Sompel, H. (2009), “Attempts at innovation in scholarly communication”, 9th International Bielefeld Conference, Bielefeld, Germany, 3‐5 February 2009, available at: http://conference.ub.uni‐bielefeld.de/2009/programme/presentations/vandesompel_BC09.pdf (accessed 22 May 2009).

van de Sompel, H., Payette, S., Erickson, J., Lagoze, C. and Warner, S. (2004), “Rethinking scholarly communication. Building the system that scholars deserve”, D‐Lib Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 9, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/september04/vandesompel/09vandesompel.html (accessed 22 May 2009).

Wersig, G. (1987a), “Informations‐Explosion oder Quatsch‐Explosion? Wissen im Spannungsfeld von Kalkül und Ästhetik”, Cogito, Vol. 1, pp. 44‐8.

Wersig, G. (1987b), “Informations‐Explosion oder Quatsch‐Explosion? Wissen im Spannungsfeld von Kalkül und Ästhetik”, Cogito, Vol. 2, pp. 26‐31.