University students’ learning approaches: An adaptation of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire to Norwegian

Studies in Educational Evaluation - Tập 64 - Trang 100816 - 2020
Yusuf F. Zakariya1, K. Bjørkestøl1, H.K. Nilsen1, S. Goodchild1, M. Lorås2
1Department of Mathematical Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
2Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baeten, 2010, Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness, Educational Research Review, 5, 243, 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001 Bentler, 1990, Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238, 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 Biggs, 2012, What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning, Higher Education Research & Development, 31, 39, 10.1080/07294360.2012.642839 Biggs, 2001, The revised two factor study processquestionnaire: R-SPQ-2F, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133, 10.1348/000709901158433 Brown, 2015 Browne, 1992, Alternative ways of assessing model fit, Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230, 10.1177/0049124192021002005 Byrne, 2012 Chan, 2010, Approach to learning of sub-degree students in Hong Kong, Research in Education, 84, 65, 10.7227/RIE.84.5 Diseth, 2001, Validation of a Norwegian version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 381, 10.1080/00313830120096789 Diseth, 2010, Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: The role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies, Higher Education, 59, 335, 10.1007/s10734-009-9251-8 Fryer, 2012, The adaptation and validation of the CEQ and the R-SPQ-2F to the Japanese tertiary environment, The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 549, 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02045.x Fryer, 2018, Regulating approaches to learning: Testing learning strategy convergences across a year at university, The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 21, 10.1111/bjep.12169 Gagne, 2006, Measurement model quality, sample size, and solution propriety in confirmatory factor models, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 65, 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_5 Hu, 1998, Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification, Psychological Methods, 3, 424, 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 Hu, 1999, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1, 10.1080/10705519909540118 Immekus, 2010, A test and cross-validation of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire factor structure among western university students, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 495, 10.1177/0013164409355685 Jöreskog, 1988 Justicia, 2008, The revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses at item level, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 355, 10.1007/BF03173004 Kember, 1990, Cultural specificity of approaches to study, The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 356, 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1990.tb00952.x Kolenikov, 2012, Testing negative error variances, Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 124, 10.1177/0049124112442138 Lake, 2017, Understanding how students study: The genealogy and conceptual basis of a widely used pedagogical research tool, Biggs’ study process questionnaire, International Education Studies, 10, 100, 10.5539/ies.v10n5p100 Leung, 2008, Examining the cultural specificity of approaches to learning in universities in Hong Kong and Sydney, Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 39, 251, 10.1177/0022022107313905 López-Aguado, 2018, Checking the underlying structure of R-SPQ-2F using covariance structure analysis / Comprobación de la estructura subyacente del R-SPQ-2F mediante análisis de estructura de covarianza, Cultura y Educación/ Culture and Education, 30, 105, 10.1080/11356405.2017.1416787 MacCallum, 1996, Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling, Psychological Methods, 1, 130, 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 Maciejewski, 2016, Mathematical tasks, study approaches, and course grades in undergraduate mathematics: A year-by-year analysis, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47, 373, 10.1080/0020739X.2015.1072881 Marsh, 2004, In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings, Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320, 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 Marton, 1976, On qualitative differences in learning - II: Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task, The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115, 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x Marton, 1976, On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process, The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4, 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x Merino, 2013, Validación estructural del R-SPQ-2F: Un análisis factorial confirmatorio, Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 7, 113 Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide. (Eighth ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Önder, 2010, Adaptation of revised two factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) to Turkish, Education and Science, 35, 55 Raykov, 2016, Scale reliability evaluation under multiple assumption violations, Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 302, 10.1080/10705511.2014.938597 Shaik, 2017, Assessing Saudi medical students learning approach using the revised two-factor study process questionnaire, International Journal of Medical Education, 8, 292, 10.5116/ijme.5974.7a06 Socha, 2014, Exploring and “reconciling” the factor structure for the revised two-factor study process questionnaire, Learning and Individual Differences, 31, 43, 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.010 Steiger, 2016, Notes on the Steiger–Lind (1980) handout, Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 777, 10.1080/10705511.2016.1217487 Stes, 2013, Examining the cross-cultural sensitivity of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) and validation of a Dutch version, PloS One, 8, e54099, 10.1371/journal.pone.0054099 Suh, 2015, The performance of maximum likelihood and weighted least square mean and variance adjusted estimators in testing differential item functioning with nonnormal trait distributions, Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22, 568, 10.1080/10705511.2014.937669 Tait, 1998, ASSIST: A re-conceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory, 262 Tucker, 1973, The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis, Psychometrika, 38, 1, 10.1007/BF02291170 Valadas, 2010, Approaches to studying in higher education Portuguese students: A Portuguese version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students, Higher Education, 59, 259, 10.1007/s10734-009-9246-5 Weller, 2013, Approaches to learning for the ANZCA final examination and validation of the revised study process questionnaire in specialist medical training, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 41, 631, 10.1177/0310057X1304100509 Wolf, 2013, Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76, 913, 10.1177/0013164413495237 Xie, 2014, Validating the revised two-factor study process questionnaire among Chinese university students, The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 16