Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection

Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics - Tập 37 Số 1 - Trang 43-66 - 2006
Hanna Kokko1, Michael D. Jennions2, Robert C. Brooks3
1Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland;
2School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
3School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

Tóm tắt

Sexual reproduction is associated with the evolution of anisogamy and sperm-producing males and egg-laying females. The ensuing competition for mates has led to sexual selection and coevolution of the sexes. Mathematical models are extensively used to test the plausibility of different complicated scenarios for the evolution of sexual traits. Unfortunately, the diversity of models is now itself equally bewildering. Here we clarify some of the current debate by reviewing evolutionary explanations for the relationship between anisogamy, potential reproductive rates, parental care, sex roles, and mate choice. We review the benefits females might gain by mating with certain males rather than others. We also consider other forms of selection that can make females mate nonrandomly. One way empiricists can contribute to resolving theoretical disputes is to quantify the cost of expressing mating biases in the appropriate life-history currency.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/35079590

10.1098/rspb.1998.0574

Alonzo SH, 2000, Evol. Ecol. Res., 2, 149

Andersson M, 1994, Sexual Selection, 10.1515/9780691207278

10.1086/429350

10.1006/anbe.2000.1446

10.1515/9781400850600

10.1007/s002650050258

10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0301:PSTITC]2.0.CO;2

10.1086/431022

10.1016/S0065-3454(03)01003-9

10.1098/rspb.1999.0904

10.1890/04-1209

10.1554/04-445

10.1086/382547

10.1038/35017552

10.1086/303219

10.1098/rspb.2002.2161

10.1086/497401

10.1098/rspb.2003.2433

10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00584.x

10.1098/rspb.2000.1301

10.1073/pnas.041378098

10.1086/417793

10.1098/rspb.2004.2688

10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0715:SSATEO]2.3.CO;2

10.1086/429348

10.1126/science.327542

10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01471-2

10.1086/320862

10.1007/s002850200138

Eshel I, 2000, Evol. Ecol. Res., 2, 509

10.1038/nature02492

10.5962/bhl.title.27468

10.1038/nature02562

10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00597.x

10.1086/444443

10.1038/nature03363

10.1098/rspb.2000.1382

10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.016

10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80088-8

10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80087-6

10.1006/anbe.1999.1271

10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.01.014

10.1086/498623

10.1007/s002850050019

10.1086/367587

10.1371/journal.pbio.0030033

Heisler L, 1987, Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, 97

10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80146-0

10.2307/2410914

10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.005

10.1098/rspb.2001.1823

Houle D, 1996, Genetics, 143, 1467, 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1467

10.1098/rstb.2001.0925

10.1007/s10539-005-9016-4

10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.008

10.1038/nature03084

10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.035

10.1016/S0040-5809(02)00012-6

10.1038/377420a0

10.1006/jtbi.1999.0979

10.2307/2409890

10.1017/S0006323199005423

10.2307/2410876

10.1086/284380

10.1086/284480

10.1073/pnas.94.4.1282

10.1038/350033a0

10.1023/A:1006541701002

10.1098/rspb.1998.0515

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00224.x

10.1007/s10682-004-7919-1

10.1098/rspb.2002.2020

10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00009-0

10.1098/rstb.2001.0926

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00212.x

10.2307/2407630

10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721

10.2307/2408842

10.1086/423150

10.1016/0003-3472(77)90062-8

10.1038/43869

10.1098/rspb.2003.2396

10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.003

10.1007/s001140100255

10.1098/rspb.1994.0148

10.1016/S0022-5193(02)93112-7

10.1098/rstb.2005.1785

10.1098/rspb.1996.0048

10.1016/0022-5193(72)90007-0

10.1086/317007

10.1023/A:1000338223164

10.1098/rspb.2002.2090

10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80169-8

10.1098/rspb.1987.0038

Pomiankowski A, 1988, Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol., 5, 136

10.1017/CBO9780511752421.014

10.2307/2409889

10.1006/bijl.1993.1014

10.1098/rspb.2002.2129

10.1086/342821

10.1098/rspb.1997.0216

10.1038/nature04564

10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02270-4

10.1086/285093

10.1038/nature04114

10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.018

10.1086/429395

10.1098/rspb.1996.0207

10.1098/rstb.2001.0931

Shuster SM, 2003, Mating Systems and Strategies, 10.1515/9780691206882

10.1038/35079578

Simmons LW, 2001, Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects

10.1098/rspb.2005.3309

10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02505-3

10.1098/rspb.1997.0117

10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130424

10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.029

Trivers R, 1972, Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 136

10.1086/383619

10.1086/341520

10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00948.x

10.1086/283379

10.1006/anbe.1999.1215

10.2307/2410875

10.1098/rspb.1994.0001

Williams GC, 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Thought

10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3

10.1016/0022-5193(77)90061-3

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Tập 37 Số 1

43-66

Thông tin tác giả