Unified architecture for network measurement: The case of available bandwidth

Journal of Network and Computer Applications - Tập 35 - Trang 1402-1414 - 2012
Giuseppe Aceto1, Alessio Botta1, Antonio Pescapé1, Maurizio D'Arienzo2
1University of Napoli Federico II, Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Via Claudio 21, 80125, Italy
2Second University of Napoli, Dipartimento di Studi Europei e Mediterranei, via del Setificio 15, 81100, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aceto G, Botta A, Pescapé A, D'Arienzo M. UANM: a platform for experimenting with available bandwidth estimation tools. In: IEEE symposium on computers and communications; 2010. p. 174–9. Ali AA, Michaut F, Lepage F. End-to-end available bandwidth measurement tools: a comparative evaluation of performances. In: 4th international workshop on internet performance, simulation, monitoring and measurement. Austria; 2006. Angrisani, 2006, Techniques for available bandwidth measurement in IP networks: a performance comparison, Computer Networks, 50, 332, 10.1016/j.comnet.2005.06.003 Botta, 2005, BET: a hybrid bandwidth estimation tool, vol. 2, 520 Botta A, Dainotti A, Pescapé A. Multi-protocol and multi-platform traffic generation and measurement. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2007 DEMO session; May 2007. Botta, 2010, Do you trust your software-based traffic generator?, IEEE Communications Magazine, 48, 158, 10.1109/MCOM.2010.5560600 Croce, 2010, The quest for bandwidth estimation techniques for large-scale distributed systems, SIGMETRICS—Performance Evaluation Review, 37, 20, 10.1145/1710115.1710120 Goldoni, 2010, End-to-end available bandwidth estimation tools, an experimental comparison, 171 Goldoni, 2009, Assolo, a new method for available bandwidth estimation, 130 Guerrero, 2010, Traceband: a fast, low overhead and accurate tool for available bandwidth estimation and monitoring, Computer Networks, 54, 977, 10.1016/j.comnet.2009.09.024 Hu, 2003, Evaluation and characterization of available bandwidth probing techniques, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 21, 879, 10.1109/JSAC.2003.814505 Jain, 2003, End-to-end available bandwidth: measurement methodology, dynamics, and relation with tcp throughput, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 11, 537, 10.1109/TNET.2003.815304 Jin, 2003, System capability effects on algorithms for network bandwidth measurement, 27 Johnsson A, Melander B, Björkman, M. Diettopp: A first implementation and evaluation of a simplified bandwidth measurement method. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Swedish national computer networking workshop; 2004. Lakshminarayanan, 2004, Bandwidth estimation in broadband access networks, 314 Li M, Claypool M, Kinicki R. WBest: a bandwidth estimation tool for IEEE 802.11 wireless networks. In: 33rd IEEE conference on local computer networks, LCN 2008; 2008. p. 374–81. Murray, 2005, Comparison of end-to-end bandwidth measurement tools on the 10GigE TeraGrid backbone, 300 Navratil J, Cottrell RL. Abwe: a practical approach to available bandwidth estimation. In: Passive and active measurement (PAM) workshop 2003 proceedings. La Jolla. Paxson, 1997, End-to-end internet packet dynamics, 139 Paxson, 2004, Strategies for sound internet measurement, 263 Prasad, 2004, Effects of interrupt coalescence on network measurements Ribeiro, 2003, Pathchirp: efficient available bandwidth estimation for network paths Shriram, 2007, Empirical evaluation of techniques for measuring available bandwidth, 2162 Shriram, 2005, Comparison of public end-to-end bandwidth estimation tools on high-speed links, vol. 3431, 306 Sommers, 2006, A proposed framework for calibration of available bandwidth estimation tools, 709 Song, 2007, Netquest: a flexible framework for large scale network measurements, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 17, 106, 10.1109/TNET.2008.925635 Strauss, 2003, A measurement study of available bandwidth estimation tools, 39 Urvoy-Keller, 2008, Operational comparison of available bandwidth estimation tools, ACM SIGCOMM—Computer Communication Review, 38, 39, 10.1145/1341431.1341438