Underwater disaster victim identification: the process and the problems
Tóm tắt
An underwater disaster may involve a crime scene investigation which should be handled as if it were located above water and include a detailed description and documentation of items, belongings and findings. The environment, however, creates special circumstances, each with specific problems that are not encountered during land investigations. Risks associated with underwater recovery cannot be overestimated and underwater disaster recovery diving should not be performed without special training and careful pre-dive planning. Handling of cadavers in an underwater recovery operation also requires special training and a systematic approach to victim recovery. Environmental circumstances, local judicial requirements, religious and cultural issues and the scope of the disaster are only some of the factors that have to be considered before commencing any aquatic disaster victim recovery operation.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Becker RF. Underwater crime scene: underwater crime investigative techniques. Springfield: Charles Thomas; 1995.
Berry M. The waters edge. A manual for the underwater criminal investigator. Virginia: Underwater Criminal Investigators; 2004.
Byard RW, James RA, Heath KJ. Recovery of human remains after shark attack. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2006;27(3):256–9.
Holmlund G, Wetterling G, Formisto T, Kauppila R. Identification, of four crewmembers of the Douglas DC-3 79001 Hugin by DNA analysis, 52 years post mortem. Scan J Forensic Sci. 2008;14(1):5–9.
Soomer H, Ranta H, Penttilä A. Identification of victims from the M/S Estonia. Int J Legal Med. 2001;114(4–5):259–62.
Petju M, Suteerayongprasert A, Thongpud R, Hassiri K. Importance of dental records for victim identification following the Indian Ocean tsunami disaster in Thailand. Public Health. 2007;121(4):251–7.
Sweet D. INTERPOL DVI best-practice standards—An overview. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201(1–3):18–21.
Byard RW, Winskog C. Potential problems arising during international disaster victim identification (DVI) exercises. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010;6(1):1–2.
Huckenbeck W, Thiel W, Krause D, Lessig R, Szibor R (2008) Thoughts for the organisation of an early phase response to preserve victim identification information after mass disasters. A contribution to: ISFG: Recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI by Prinz M, Carracedo A, Mayr WR, Morling N, Parsons TJ, Sajantila A, Scheithauer R, Schmitter H, Schneider PM). Forensic Sci Int 20:39–42.
McCarty VO, Sohn AP, Ritzlin RS, Gauthier JH. Scene investigation, identification, and victim examination following the accident of Galaxy 203: disaster preplanning does work. J Forensic Sci. 1987;32:983–7.
Cordner SM, Woodford N, Bassed R. Forensic aspects of the 2009 Victorian Bushfires disaster. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;205:2–7.
Blau S, Robertson S, Johnstone M. Disaster victim identification: new applications for postmortem computed tomography. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:956–61.
Sidler M, Jackowski C, Dirnhofer R, Vock P, Thali M. Use of multislice computed tomography in disaster victim identification–advantages and limitations. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;169:118–28.
Rutty GN, Robinson C, Morgan B, Black S, Adams C, Webster P. Fimag: the United Kingdom disaster victim/forensic identification imaging system. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54:1438–42.
Dilen DR. The motion of floating and submerged objects in the Chattahoochee River, Atlanta, GA. Journal Forensic Sci. 1984;29:1027–37.
ICRC (2004) The handling of human remains and information on the dead in situations relating to armed conflicts or internal violence and involving missing persons. In: 16th Meeting of the Standing Committee on Disaster Victim Identification, Lyon, France. http://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/interpol_2004dvi_en.pdf.
Piette MH, De Letter EA. Drowning: still a difficult autopsy diagnosis. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;163:1–9.
Timperman J. The diagnosis of drowning. A review. Forensic Sci. 1972;1:397–409.
Lunetta P, Penttilüa A, Sajantila A. Circumstances and macropathologic findings in 1590 consecutive cases of bodies found in water. Am J Forensic MedPathol. 2002;23:371–6.