Understanding the purpose of benefit corporations: an empirical study on the Italian case

Giorgio Mion1, Cristian R. Loza Adaui2
1Department of Business Administration, University of Verona, Via Cantarane 24, 37129 Verona, Italy
2Institute of Economics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kochstr. 4 (17), 91054, Erlangen, Germany

Tóm tắt

AbstractRethinking the traditional understanding of organizational purpose appears to be necessary. A teleological paradigm shift seems to be on its way, changing the focus of attention from considering business organizations as instruments used to generate profits toward a more comprehensive understanding of their purpose and of the benefit they can create for society. Recently, new organizational entities have emerged, accompanied by the renewal of institutional frameworks, among them are benefit corporations. Italy was the first European country to introduce a legal framework to define the benefit corporation as a particular legal entity. The Italian law on the benefit corporations proposes the promotion of firms that pursue the generation of benefit in a responsible, sustainable, and transparent way and considering diverse stakeholders. This paper explores and describes the multidimensional understanding of benefit and purpose of Italian benefit corporations, utilizing qualitative and quantitative content analysis of 94 Italian benefit corporations’ purpose declarations, and providing a deep insight into the purpose declared by benefit corporations. The research highlights a certain vagueness in public declarations of the purpose of benefit corporations, even though it is clear that they attempt to differentiate themselves from traditional businesses by focusing on social objectives more than on economic ones. Furthermore, normative compliance emerged, but further normative requirements seem to be needed to make more effective the transformative potentiality of benefit corporations and to avoid risks of opportunistic behaviors.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

André, R. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: Will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1254-1.

André, R. (2015). Benefit corporations at a crossroads: As lawyers weigh in, companies weigh their options. Business Horizons, 58, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.12.002.

Artz, N., Gramlich, J., & Porter, T. (2012). Low-profit limited liability companies (L3Cs). Journal of Public Affairs, 12(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1437.

Azzini, L. (1982). Istituzioni di economia d’azienda. Milano: Giuffrè.

Basu, S. (1999). Corporate purpose: Why it matters more than strategy. New York: Garland Publishing.

Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391.

Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 50–55.

Baudot, L., Dillard, J., & Pencle, N. (2020). The emergence of benefit corporations: A cautionary tale. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 67, 102073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.01.005.

Bertarini, B. (2016). La società benefit: Spunti di riflessione sulle nuove prospettive del settore non profit. Diritto e Giustizia, 14, 1–23.

Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (2001). The emergence of social enterprise. London: Routledge.

Broglia, A., Corsi, C., Farinon, P., & Mion, G. (2017). Tra economicità e bene comune Analisi critica delle cooperative sociali come hybrid organizations. Roma: Rirea.

Bull, M., & Ridley-Duff, R. (2019). Towards an appreciation of ethics in social Enterprise business models. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 619-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3794-5.

Callison, J. W., & Vestal, A. W. (2010). The L3C illusion: Why low-profit limited liability companies will not stimulate socially optimal Private Foundation investment in entrepreneurial ventures. Vermont Law Review, 35(2), 273–293.

Cao, K., Gehman, J., & Grimes, M. G. (2017). Standing out and fitting in: Charting the emergence of certified B Corporations by industry and region, in A.C. Corbett, & J. Katz (Eds.), Hybrid Ventures (pp. 1–38) Bingley, UK: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-754020170000019001.

Catturi, G. (1971). L’impresa come organismo tridimensionale e i suoi obbiettivi alternativi al profitto. Rivista dei Dottori Commercialisti, 6, 1819.

Cetindamar, D. (2018). Designed by law: Purpose, accountability, and transparency at benefit corporations. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1423787.

Clark, W. H. J., & Babson, E. K. (2012). How benefit corporations are redefining the purpose of business corporation. William Mitchell Law Review, 38(2), 817–851.

Coda, V. (1986). Valori imprenditoriali e successo dell’impresa. In AA.VV (Ed.), Valori imprenditoriali e successo aziendale, (pp. 3–38). Milano: Giuffrè.

Collins, J. L., & Kahn, W. N. (2016). The hijacking of a new corporate form? Benefit corporations and corporate personhood. Economy and Society, 45(3–4), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2016.1239342.

Cooney, K., Koushyar, J., Lee, M., & Murray, H. (2014). Benefit corporation and L3C adoption: A survey. In Stanford Social Innovation Review. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/benefit_corporation_and_l3c_adoption_a_survey

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, (4th ed., ). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153.

Corso, S. (2016). Le società benefit nell’ordinamento italiano: Una nuova “qualifica” tra profit e non profit. Le Nuove Leggi Civili Commentate, XXXIX, 5, 995–1031.

Corticelli, R. (1995). L’azienda: Economia e socialità. Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di Economia Aziendale, 95(1/2), 24–47.

Del Baldo, M. (2019). Acting as a benefit corporation and a B Corp to responsibly pursue private and public benefits. The case of Paradisi Srl (Italy). International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-019-0042-y.

Dutheil, P.-H. (2019). Social Enterprises in Europe: The experience of three European countries. Futuribles Journal, 429(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3917/futur.429.0055.

Eiser, A. R., & Field, R. I. (2016). Can benefit corporations redeem the pharmaceutical industry? The American Journal of Medicine, 129(7), 651–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJMED.2016.02.012.

Elkington, J., & Hartigan, P. (2008). The power of unreasonable people: How social entrepreneurs create markets that change the world. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

EY Beacon Institute (2016). The state of the debate on purpose in business. Manchester: EY Beacon Institute.

Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, p. 12. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/article-15-no-title.html.

Frood, A. (2017). Mission control: Drug developers test the “benefit corporation” business model. Nature Medicine, 23(10), 1117–1118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1017-1117.

Gehman, J., & Grimes, M. (2017). Hidden badge of honour: How contextual distinctiveness affects category promotion among certified B corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2294–2320. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0416.

Gehman, J., Grimes, M. G., & Cao, K. (2019). Why we care about certified B Corporations: From valuing growth to certifying values practices. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0074.

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151.

Grimes, M. G., Gehman, J., & Cao, K. (2018). Positively deviant: Identity work through B corporation certification. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.001.

Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. J. (2012). Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.006.

Harvard Business Review Analytic Services. (2015). The business case for purpose. Harvard Business School Publishing. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/resources/pdfs/comm/ey/19392HBRReportEY.pdf.

Hemphill, T. A., & Cullari, F. (2014). The benefit corporation: Corporate governance and the for-profit social entrepreneur. Business and Society Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12044.

Henderson, R., & Van den Steen, E. (2015). Why do firms have “purpose”? The Firm’s role as a carrier of identity and reputation. American Economic Review, 105(5), 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151072.

Hiller, J. S. (2013). The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1580-3.

Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., George, G., & Nichols, C. V. (2014). Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.4005.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

Hurth, V. (2017). Organizations as open systems that need purpose and integrated thinking. Board Leadership, 2017(150), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bl.30069.

Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857812.

Jeurissen, R. (1997). Integrating micro, Meso and macro levels in business ethics. Ethical Perspectives, 4(4), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.2143/ep.4.4.562986.

Jonsen, R. H. (2016). Other-constituency theories and firm governance: Is the benefit corporation sufficient? Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 13(4), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2016.1172250.

Kimbrell, A. R. (2013). Benefit corporation legislation: An opportunity for Kansas to welcome social enterprises. Kansas Law Review, 62, 549–584.

Koslowski, P. (2000). The limits of shareholder value. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006438000855.

Koslowski, P. (2001). The shareholder value principle and the purpose of the firm. In Y. K. Shionoya (Ed.), Competition, trust, and cooperation, (pp. 179–209). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56836-7_10.

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, (4th ed., ). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Lang, R., & Minnigh, E. C. (2010). The L3C, history, basic construct, and legal framework. Vermont Law Review, 35(1), 15-30.

Lionzo, A. (2002). La cooperativa sociale. Originalità della formula, economicità e strumenti di analisi. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Lipari, C. (1989). Le forme aziendali cooperative. Principi tematici e sistematici. Milano: Giuffrè.

Loza Adaui, C.R., & Mion, G. (2016). Catholic social teaching, organizational purpose, and the for-profit/nonprofit dichotomy: Exploring the Metaprofit proposition. Journal of Markets and Morality 19(2), 275–295. Retreived from https://www.marketsandmorality.com/index.php/mandm/article/view/1190/0.

Mair, J., Battilana, J., & Cardenas, J. (2012). Organizing for society: A typology of social Entrepreneuring models. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1414-3.

Masini, C. (1968). Lavoro e risparmio. Corso di economia di azienda. Milano: Succ. Fusi-Pavia.

Matacena, A. (1990). Impresa cooperativa. Obiettivi finalizzanti. Risultati gestionali e bilancio d’esercizio. Bologna: Clueb.

Molteni, M. (2004). Responsabilità sociale e performance d'impresa. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

Moore, G. (2012). The virtue of governance, the governance of virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(02), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201222221.

Muñoz, P., Cacciotti, G., & Cohen, B. (2018). The double-edged sword of purpose-driven behavior in sustainable venturing. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(2), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.005.

Murray, J. H. (2012). Choose your own master: Social Enterprise, certifications, and benefit corporation statutes. American University Business Law Review, 2, 1–42.

Naughton, M. J., Alford, H., & Brady, B. (1995). The common good and the purpose of the firm: A critique of the shareholder and stakeholder models from the Catholic social tradition. Journal of Human Values, 1(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/097168589500100206.

Nigri, G., & Del Baldo, M. (2018). Sustainability reporting and performance measurement systems: How do small- and medium-sized benefit corporations manage integration? Sustainability, 10(12), 4499–4515. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124499.

O’Toole, J. (2019). The prospects for enlightened corporate leadership. California Management Review, 61(3), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619839677.

Oevermann, U., Allert, T., Konau, E., & Krambeck, J. (1979). Die Methodologie einer objektiven Hermeneutik und ihre allgemeine forschungslogische Bedeutung in den Sozialwissenschaften. In Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften, (pp. 352–433). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2016.06.001.

Onida, P. (1954). L’azienda. Primi principi di gestione e di organizzazione. Milano: Giuffrè.

Palmieri, M. (2017). L’interesse sociale: Dallo shareholder value alle società benefit. Banca Impresa Società, XXXVI, 2, 201–237. https://doi.org/10.1435/87553.

Pascarella, P., & Frohman, M. A. (1989). The purpose-driven organization: Unleashing the power of direction and commitment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Pies, I., Schreck, P., & Homann, K. (2018). Reconciling single-objective and multi-objective theories of the firm: A constitutional perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), 15016. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15016abstract.

Poponi, S., Colantoni, A., Cividino, S., & Mosconi, E. (2019). The stakeholders’ perspective within the B Corp certification for a circular approach. Sustainability, 11(6), 1584–1598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061584.

Quinn, R. E., & Thakor, A. V. (2018). Creating a purpose-driven organization. Harvard Business Review, 96(4), 78–85.

Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Crane, A. (2015). Benefit corporation legislation and the emergence of a social hybrid category. California Management Review, 57(3), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.13.

Reichertz, J. (2004). Objective hermeneutics and hermeneutic sociology of knowledge. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research, (pp. 290–295). London: Sage Publications.

Reyes, J. R., & Kleiner, B. H. (1990). How to establish an Organisational purpose. Management Decision, 28(7), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749010004665.

Riolfo, G. (2019). The new Italian benefit corporation. European Business Organization Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-019-00149-9.

Robson, R. (2015). A new look at benefit corporations: Game theory and game changer. American Business Law Journal, 52(3), 501–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12051.

Roth, F. M. S., & Winkler, I. (2018). B Corp entrepreneurs. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90167-1.

Sabeti, H. (2011). Spotlight on the good company. The for-benefit Enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 89(11), 1–7.

Siclari, D. (2016). Le società benefit nell’ordinamento italiano. Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto dell’economia, 1, 36–48.

Smith, N. C., & Rönnegard, D. (2016). Shareholder primacy, corporate social responsibility, and the role of business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2427-x.

Stecker, M. J. (2016). Awash in a Sea of Confusion: Benefit Corporations, Social Enterprise, and the Fear of “Greenwashing.”. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(2), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2016.1176481.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Freefall : Free markets and the sinking of the global economy. London: Penguin.

Stout, L. A. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations and the public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Stubbs, W. (2017a). Characterising B corps as a sustainable business model: An exploratory study of B corps in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.093.

Stubbs, W. (2017b). Sustainable entrepreneurship and B corps. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1920.

Stubbs, W. (2019). Strategies, practices, and tensions in managing business model innovation for sustainability: The case of an Australian BCorp. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(5), 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1786.

Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608318042.

Tessitore, A. (1968). Il concetto di impresa cooperativa in economia d’azienda. Verona: Libreria Editrice Universitaria.

Testi, E., Bellucci, M., Franchi, S., & Biggeri, M. (2017). Italian social Enterprises at the Crossroads: Their role in the evolution of the welfare state. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2403–2422 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9875-8.

Thomas, A. (2004). The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VOLU.0000046280.06580.d8.

Travaglini, C. (1997). Le cooperative sociali tra impresa e solidarietà. Caratteri economico-aziendali ed informativa economico-sociale. Bologna: Clueb.

Tyler, J. (2010). Negating the legal problem of having two masters: A framework for L3C fiduciary duties and accountability. Vermont Law Review, 35(1), 117–161.

Vaughan, S. K., & Arsneault, S. (2018). The public benefit of benefit corporations. PS: Political Science and Politics, 51(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517001391.

Ventura, L. (1996). Contratto e impresa : Europa. Contratto e Impresa, 32(4), 1134–1167.

Venturi, P., & Rago, S. (2015). Benefit corporation e impresa sociale: Convergenza e distinzione. Impresa Sociale, 6, 34–36.

Vermiglio, F. (1990). Considerazioni economico-aziendali sull’impresa cooperativa. Natura e caratteri strutturali. Messina: Industria poligrafica della Sicilia.

Warriner, C. K. (1965). The problem of organizational purpose. The Sociological Quarterly, 6(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1965.tb01647.x.

Wilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2014). The double bottom line: Profit and social benefit. Business Horizons 57(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.10.001.

Winkler, A.-L. P., Brown, J. A., & Finegold, D. L. (2019). Employees as conduits for effective stakeholder engagement: An example from B corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 913–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3924-0.

Wolf, J. (2018). The economy effect: Conceptual innovation and benefit corporations. New Political Science, 40(2), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2018.1449404.

Zan, L. (1990). L’economia dell’impresa cooperativa. Torino: Utet.

Zappa, G. (1927). Tendenze nuove negli studi di ragioneria. Milano: Istituto Editoriale Scientifico.

Zappa, G. (1957). Le produzioni nell’economia delle imprese, (vol. I). Milano: Giuffrè.