Understanding outcome bias
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akerlof, 1982, Labor contracts as partial gift exchange, Q. J. Econ., 97, 543, 10.2307/1885099
Allison, 1995, The belief in majority determination of group decision outcomes, Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol., 16, 367, 10.1207/s15324834basp1603_7
Allison, 1990, Group decisions as social inference heuristics, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 58, 801, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.801
Andreoni, 2016
Andreoni, 2009, Social image and the 50–50 norm: a theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects, Econometrica, 77, 1607, 10.3982/ECTA7384
Andreoni, 2005, Building rational cooperation, J. Econ. Theory, 127, 117, 10.1016/j.jet.2004.09.002
Andreoni, 2014
Baron, 1988, Outcome bias in decision evaluation, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54, 569, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.569
Bartling, 2011, Shifting the blame: on delegation and responsibility, Rev. Econ. Stud., 79, 67, 10.1093/restud/rdr023
Bertrand, 2001, Are ceos rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are, Q. J. Econ., 116, 901, 10.1162/00335530152466269
Blount, 1995, When social outcomes aren't fair: the effect of causal attributions on preferences, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 63, 131, 10.1006/obhd.1995.1068
Bohren, 2018
Bolton, 1991, A comparative model of bargaining: theory and evidence, Am. Econ. Rev., 81, 1096
Bolton, 2000, Erc: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition, Am. Econ. Rev., 90, 166, 10.1257/aer.90.1.166
Brock, 2013, Dictating the risk: experimental evidence on giving in risky environments, Am. Econ. Rev., 103, 415, 10.1257/aer.103.1.415
Bushong, 2016
Cameron, 2008, Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors, Rev. Econ. Stat., 90, 414, 10.1162/rest.90.3.414
Cappelen, 2013, Just luck: an experimental study of risk-taking and fairness, Am. Econ. Rev., 103, 1398, 10.1257/aer.103.4.1398
Charness, 2004, Attribution and reciprocity in an experimental labor market, J. Labor Econ., 22, 665, 10.1086/383111
Charness, 2007, Intention and stochastic outcomes: an experimental study, Econ. J., 117, 1051, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02066.x
Charness, 2002, Understanding social preferences with simple tests, Q. J. Econ., 117, 817, 10.1162/003355302760193904
Coate, 1995, Altruism, the Samaritan's dilemma, and government transfer policy, Am. Econ. Rev., 85, 46
Cole, 2012, Do voters demand responsive governments? Evidence from Indian disaster relief, J. Dev. Econ., 97, 167, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.05.005
Cushman, 2009, Accidental outcomes guide punishment in a “trembling hand” game, PLoS ONE, 4, 10.1371/journal.pone.0006699
Dana, 2007, Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness, Econ. Theory, 33, 67, 10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z
Danz, 2018
de Oliveira, 2017, Reward the lucky? An experimental investigation of the impact of agency on luck and bonuses, J. Econ. Psychol., 62, 87, 10.1016/j.joep.2017.06.008
Demski, 1987, Delegated expertise, J. Account. Res., 25, 68, 10.2307/2491259
Ehrlinger, 2005, Peering into the bias blind spot: people's assessments of bias in themselves and others, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 31, 680, 10.1177/0146167204271570
Eil, 2011, The good news-bad news effect: asymmetric procession of objection information about yourself, Am. Econ. J. Microecon., 3, 114, 10.1257/mic.3.2.114
Epstein, 2008, Living with risk, Rev. Econ. Stud., 75, 1121, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00504.x
Erkal, 2017
Exley, 2016, Excusing selfishness in charitable giving: the role of risk, Rev. Econ. Stud., 83, 587, 10.1093/restud/rdv051
Falk, 2008, Testing theories of fairness—intentions matter, Games Econ. Behav., 62, 287, 10.1016/j.geb.2007.06.001
Falk, 2006, A theory of reciprocity, Games Econ. Behav., 54, 293, 10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
Falk, 2016
Fehr, 2004, Third-party punishment and social norms, Evol. Hum. Behav., 25, 63, 10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4
Fehr, 2000, Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments, Am. Econ. Rev., 90, 980, 10.1257/aer.90.4.980
Fehr, 2002, Altruistic punishment in humans, Nature, 415, 137, 10.1038/415137a
Fehr, 1999, A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation, Q. J. Econ., 114, 817, 10.1162/003355399556151
Fischbacher, 2007, z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, Exp. Econ., 10, 171, 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
Fischhoff, 1975, Hindsight is not equal to foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 1, 288, 10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288
Gauriot, 2019, Fooled by performance randomness: over-rewarding luck, Rev. Econ. Stat, 10.1162/rest_a_00783
Gino, 2009
Gneezy, 2014, Materazzi effect and the strategic use of anger in competitive interactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, 1334, 10.1073/pnas.1313789111
Gruppen, 1994, Outcome bias and cognitive dissonance in evaluating treatment decisions, Acad. Med., 69, 57, 10.1097/00001888-199410000-00042
Gurdal, 2013, Why blame?, J. Polit. Econ., 121, 1205, 10.1086/674409
Haggag, 2018, Attribution bias in consumer choice, Rev. Econ. Stud, 10.1093/restud/rdy054
Halevy, 2009
Hölmstrom, 1979, Moral hazard and observability, Bell J. Econ., 10, 74, 10.2307/3003320
Konow, 2000, Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions, Am. Econ. Rev., 90, 1072, 10.1257/aer.90.4.1072
Konow, 2005, Blind spots: the effects of information and stakes on fairness bias and dispersion, Soc. Justice Res., 18, 349, 10.1007/s11211-005-8566-6
Landmann, 2016, What elicits third-party anger? The effects of moral violation and others' outcome on anger and compassion, Cogn. Emot., 31, 1
Lefgren, 2014, Sticking with what (barely) worked: a test of outcome bias, Manag. Sci., 61, 1121, 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1966
Lefgren, 2016, Effort, luck, and voting for redistribution, J. Public Econ., 143, 89, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.012
Loewenstein, 2003, Projection bias in predicting future utility, Q. J. Econ., 118, 1209, 10.1162/003355303322552784
Mackie, 1998, Ingroup and outgroup inferences: when ingroup bias overwhelms outcome bias, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 28, 343, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199805/06)28:3<343::AID-EJSP863>3.0.CO;2-U
Mackie, 2001, The impact of perceiver attitudes on outcome-biased dispositional inferences, Social Cogn., 19, 71, 10.1521/soco.19.1.71.18960
Mackie, 1990, Outcome-biased inferences and the perception of change in groups, Social Cogn., 8, 325, 10.1521/soco.1990.8.4.325
McCabe, 2003, Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 52, 267, 10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00003-9
Myerson, 1991
Nelson, 2002, Equity or intention: it is the thought that counts, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 48, 423, 10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00245-1
Pronin, 2007, Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment, Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, 37, 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001
Pronin, 2002, The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 28, 369, 10.1177/0146167202286008
Rabin, 1993, Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics, Am. Econ. Rev., 83, 1281
Rubin, 2015, Principal-agent settings with random shocks, Manag. Sci., 62, 985, 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2177
Sarsons, 2017
Schwarz, 1983, Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 45, 513, 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
Stein, 2016
Sutter, 2007, Outcomes versus intentions: on the nature of fair behavior and its development with age, J. Econ. Psychol., 28, 69, 10.1016/j.joep.2006.09.001
Weber, 2001, The illusion of leadership: misattribution of cause in coordination games, Organ. Sci., 12, 582, 10.1287/orsc.12.5.582.10090
Wolfers, 2002