Understanding others, reciprocity, and self-consciousness

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 17 - Trang 267-278 - 2017
Katja Crone1
1Institut für Philosophie und Politikwissenschaft, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany

Tóm tắt

The article explores the basic conceptual relationship between social cognition, intersubjectivity and self-consciousness. A much-debated recent approach to social cognition, the so-called interaction theory, is the view that the ability to perceive, understand and interpret the behavior of others relies on interaction in the sense of mutual coordination of the embodied agents involved. It will be shown that this notion of reciprocity is too weak in order to fully account for social understanding. It will be argued that the idea of reciprocity should at least in some cases be conceived of as a stance persons adopt towards each other, which in turn presupposes that they acknowledge each other as self-conscious agents. This view is inspired by an argument originally introduced by Johann Gottlieb Fichte.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Baker, L. R. (2012). From consciousness to self-consciousness. In K. Crone, K. Musholt & A. Strasser (Eds.), Facets of self-consciousness (pp. 19–38). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. Baldwin, D. A., & Baird, J. A. (2001). Action analysis: a gateway to intentional inference. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition (pp. 215–240). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind and Lnguage, 28(5), 606–637. Currie, G., & Ravenscroft, I. (2002). Recreative minds: imagination in philosophy and psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting (commentary). Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 535–542. De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction can constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Science, 14(10), 441–447. Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2012). The interactive brain hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(163). Fichte, J. G. (1992). Foundations of transcendental philosophy (Ed. and trans. by D. Braezeale). Ithaka: Cornell University Press. Fichte, J. G. (2000). Foundations of natural right. According to the principles of the wissenschaftslehre (Ed. by F. Neuhouser; trans. by M. Baur). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactice intersubjectivity: participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–486. Gallagher, S. (2008). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 535–543. Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind. London: Routledge. Goldman, A. I. (1989). Interpretation psychologized. Mind and Language, 4, 161–185. Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds the philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gopnik, A. (1993). How we know our minds: the illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 16, 1–14. Gopnik, A., & Metzloff, A. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge: Bradford MIT Press. Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1994). The ‘Theory-Theory’. In L. Hirschfeld & S. Gelman (Eds.), Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 257–293). NewYork: Cambridge University Press. Heal, J. (2013). Illocution, recognition and cooperation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LXXXVII, 137–154. Henrich, D. (1967). Fichtes ursprüngliche Einsicht. Frankfurt: Klostermann. Lang, B., & Perner, J. (2002). Understanding of intention and false belief and the development of self-control. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 67–76. Moran, Richard (2013). Testimony, illocutionary and the second person. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LXXXVII, 115–135. Murray, & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulation of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers. In T. M. Field & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 177–197). Norwood: Ablex. Musholt, K. (2012). Self-consciousness and intersubjectivity. In K. Crone, K. Musholt & A. Strasser (Eds.), Facets of self-consciousness (pp. 63–89). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. Neuhouser, F. (1990). Fichte’s theory of subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Neuhouser, F. (2001). The efficacy of the rational being. In J.-C. Merle (Ed.), Grundlage des Naturrechts (pp. 39–50). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Newen, A., & Vogeley, K. (2007). Menschliches Selbstbewusstsein und die Fähigkeit zur Zuschreibung von Einstellungen. In H. Förstl (Ed.), Theory of mind (pp. 99–116). Heidelberg: Springer. Ratcliffe, M. (2007). Rethinking commonsense psychology. A critique of folk psychology, theory of mind and simulation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Reddy, V. (2003). On being the object of attention: implications for self-other consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(9), 397–402. Rödl, S. (2014). Intentional transaction. Philosophical Explorations, 17(3), 304–316. Searle, J. R. (2002). Consciousness and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sokolowski, R. (2008). Phenomenology of the human person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Spaulding, S. (2015). On whether we can see intentions. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 96(3). Steward, H. (2012). A metaphysics for freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tomasello, M. (1993). Infants’ knowledge of self, other, and relationship. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The perceived self (pp. 174–184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.