Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption

Journal of Consumer Culture - Tập 11 Số 1 - Trang 61-78 - 2011
Kirsten Gram‐Hanssen1,2
1Aalborg University, Denmark
2By, Bolig og Ejendom (BBE)

Tóm tắt

Practice theory has recently emerged within consumer studies as a promising approach that shifts focus from the individual consumer towards the collective aspects of consumption, and from spectacular and conspicuous dimensions of consumption towards routine and mundane aspects of consumption. Practice theory is, however, not a commonly agreed upon theory, but more like an approach, or a turn within contemporary social theory. When using practice theory in consumer studies, there are thus several conditions that need further clarification. The focus in this article is on how change and continuity in practices can be understood in practice theory. Discussions will include the balance between routinization and reflectivity as well as ways to understand the role of new technology in introducing change in consumer practices. One aspect of this is a discussion on how to include technologies and other types of material consumer goods in practice theory. Case studies on household energy consumption are used as an empirical basis for these discussions. Looking at household energy consumption through the theoretical lens of practice theory necessitates discussion on whether energy consumption should be viewed as one single practice or part of several different practices. The latter stimulates questioning on how these different consumer practices are related to each other horizontally and vertically, as parallel practices or as different levels of practices, and whether changes in one practice affect (or refrain from affecting) other related consumer practices, whether through reflexivity, routines or the materiality of consumer goods.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.013

Bourdieu P., 1976, Outline of a Theory of Practice

Ehn B. and Löfgren O. (2009) Routines - made and unmade. In: Shove E, Trentmann F and Wilk R (eds) Time, Consumption and Everydaylife. Practice, Materiality and Culture. Oxford and New York: Berg, 99-114.

10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8

Giddens A., 1984, The Constitution of Society

Gram-Hanssen K., Asilo-mar Conference Center

10.1080/15487733.2007.11907998

10.1080/09613210903541527

10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00194.x

Gronow J, 2001, Ordinary Consumption

Halkier B. ( 2001) Routinization or reflexivity? Consumers and normative claims for environmental considerations. In: Gronow J and Warde A (eds) Ordinary Consumption. Berkshire, UK: Harwood Academic Publishers, 25-44.

10.1177/1469540504040903

Kemp R., 2006, Changes to Sustainable Consumption

10.1177/14695405030033014

10.1177/144078330203800101

Olesen B., 2004, Da danske hjem blev elektriske 1900 - 2000

10.1177/13684310222225432

10.1111/1468-5914.00183

Rip A., 1998, Resources and Technology, 2

10.1017/CBO9780511527470

Schatzki TR, 2002, The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change, 10.1515/9780271023717

Schatzki TR, 2001, The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory

Shove E., 2003, Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience. The Social Organization of Normality

10.1177/1469540505049846

10.5040/9781474293679

Shove E., 2009, Practice, Materiality and Culture

10.1177/1469540505053090

Wilk R., 2009, Practice, Materiality and Culture

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Consumer Culture

Tập 11 Số 1

61-78

Thông tin tác giả