Underreporting contextual factors preclude the applicability appraisal in primary care randomized controlled trials

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Tập 160 - Trang 24-32 - 2023
Aristea Missiou1, Eleni Ntalaouti1, Christos Lionis2,3, Evangelos Evangelou4,5, Athina Tatsioni1
1Research Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
2Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece
3Department of Health, Medicine and Care, General Practice, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
4Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Burford, 2013, Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making, J Clin Epidemiol, 66, 1251, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.017 Weise, 2020, Assessing context suitability (generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability) of findings in evidence syntheses in healthcare-An integrative review of methodological guidance, Res Synth Methods, 11, 760, 10.1002/jrsm.1453 Wang, 2006, Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health, Health Promot Int, 21, 76, 10.1093/heapro/dai025 Han, 2021, Improving the applicability and feasibility of clinical practice guidelines in primary care: recommendations for guideline development and implementation, Risk Manag Healthc Policy, 14, 3473, 10.2147/RMHP.S311254 Missiou, 2015, Systematic reviews do not comment on applicability for primary care, J Clin Epidemiol, 68, 1152, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.003 Burchett, 2018, Assessing the applicability of public health intervention evaluations from one setting to another: a methodological study of the usability and usefulness of assessment tools and frameworks, Health Res Policy Syst, 16, 88, 10.1186/s12961-018-0364-3 Lavis, 2009, SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review, Health Res Policy Syst, 7, S9, 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S9 Nguyen, 2021, Appraising clinical applicability of studies: mapping and synthesis of current frameworks, and proposal of the FrACAS framework and VICORT checklist, BMC Med Res Methodol, 21, 248, 10.1186/s12874-021-01445-0 Munthe-Kaas, 2019, Systematic mapping of checklists for assessing transferability, Syst Rev, 8, 22, 10.1186/s13643-018-0893-4 Atkins, 2011, Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program, J Clin Epidemiol, 64, 1198, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.021 Rothwell, 2005, External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?", Lancet, 365, 82, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8 Spring, 2007, Examination of the analytic quality of behavioral health randomized clinical trials, J Clin Psychol, 63, 53, 10.1002/jclp.20334 Czwikla, 2022, Generalizability and reach of a randomized controlled trial to improve oral health among home care recipients: comparing participants and nonparticipants at baseline and during follow-up, Trials, 23, 560, 10.1186/s13063-022-06470-y Missiou, 2023, Health outcomes in primary care: a 20-year evidence map of randomized controlled trials, Fam Pract, 40, 128, 10.1093/fampra/cmac067 Carinci, 2015, Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators, Int J Qual Health Care, 27, 137 2015 Kersting, 2020, Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity, BMC Health Serv Res, 20, 596, 10.1186/s12913-020-05442-9 Hoffmann, 2014, Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide, BMJ, 348, g1687, 10.1136/bmj.g1687 Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 McErlean, 2023, The reporting standards of randomised controlled trials in leading medical journals between 2019 and 2020: a systematic review, Ir J Med Sci, 192, 73, 10.1007/s11845-022-02955-6 Hisham, 2018, A comparison of evidence-based medicine practices between primary care physicians in rural and urban primary care settings in Malaysia: a qualitative study, BMJ Open, 8, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018933 Muthukrishnan, 2018, Conducting a randomized trial in rural and urban safety-net health centers: added value of community-based participatory research, Contemp Clin Trials Commun, 10, 29, 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.02.005 Nilsen, 2019, Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes, BMC Health Serv Res, 19, 189, 10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3 Rogers, 2020, Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic review, BMC Health Serv Res, 20, 591, 10.1186/s12913-020-05212-7 Li, 2018, Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: a systematic integrative review, Syst Rev, 7, 72, 10.1186/s13643-018-0734-5 Wells, 2012, Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions, Trials, 13, 95, 10.1186/1745-6215-13-95 Orkin, 2021, Reporting of sociodemographic variables in randomized clinical trials, 2014-2020, JAMA Netw Open, 4, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10700 Campbell, 1957, Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings, Psychol Bull, 54, 297, 10.1037/h0040950 Glasgow, 2004, The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?, Ann Behav Med, 27, 3, 10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2 Wende, 2022, Developing criteria for research translation decision-making in community settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis informed by the Knowledge to Action Framework and community input, Implement Sci Commun, 3, 76, 10.1186/s43058-022-00316-z Glasgow, 2019, RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review, Front Public Health, 7, 64, 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 Forbes, 2019, Improving the relevance of randomised trials to primary care: a qualitative study investigating views towards pragmatic trials and the PRECIS-2 tool, Trials, 20, 711, 10.1186/s13063-019-3812-7 Schlechter, 2021, Application of community - engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity, Prev Med Rep, 24, 101620, 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101620 Berwick, 2008, The triple aim: care, health, and cost, Health Aff, 27, 759, 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759 Leppin, 2014, Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials, JAMA Intern Med, 174, 1095, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1608 Albert, 2015, Transitions of care in heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, Circ Heart Fail, 8, 384, 10.1161/HHF.0000000000000006 Rennke, 2015, Transitional care strategies from hospital to home: a review for the neurohospitalist, Neurohospitalist, 5, 35, 10.1177/1941874414540683 Mitchell, 2016, How Hospitals reengineer their discharge processes to reduce readmissions, J Healthc Qual, 38, 116, 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000005 Virapongse, 2018, Self-identified social determinants of health during transitions of care in the medically Underserved: a narrative review, J Gen Intern Med, 33, 1959, 10.1007/s11606-018-4615-3