Uncertainty in fatigue loading: Consequences on statistical evaluation of reliability in service

Castillo, 2009 Castillo, 2007, A fatigue model with local sensitivity analysis, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 30, 149, 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01099.x Castillo, 2009, A statistical fatigue model covering the tension and compression Wöhler fields, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 24, 199, 10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.06.003 Kececioglu, 2003, vol. 1 Nelson, 1990 Shen CL. Statistical analysis of fatigue data. University of Arizona, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering. Ph.D. dissertation; 1994. Schijve, 1994, Fatigue predictions and scatter, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 17, 381, 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00239.x Kandil, 1993, The influence of load misalignment during uniaxial low-cycle fatigue testing–I: modeling, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 16, 509, 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00763.x Kandil, 1993, The influence of load misalignment during uniaxial low-cycle fatigue testing–II: applications, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 16, 529, 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00764.x Thomas, 1993 ASTM Standard E 606-80, 1980 British Standard BS 7270:1990, 1990 ASTM Standard E 1012-89, 1989 Kandil FA. Recent intercomparison on low cycle fatigue and alignment measurements. Report 41. Versailles: VAMAS; 2003. Kandil FA. A procedure for the measurement of machine alignment in axial testing. Report 42. Versailles: VAMAS; 2003. ASTM Standard E 466-96 (Reapproved 2002). Standard practice for conducting force controlled constant amplitude axial fatigue tests of metallic materials. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 2002. Svensson T, Holmgren M, Johansson K, Johnson E. Inter-laboratory comparison of fatigue test with evaluation of the participating laboratories calculations of measurement uncertainty. Technical Report 533. Espoo: Nordtest; 2003. Holmgren, 2005, Reflections regarding uncertainty of measurement, on the results of a Nordic fatigue test interlaboratory comparison, Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 10, 208, 10.1007/s00769-005-0910-x JCGM/WG 1 100:2008. Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology; 2008. Pyttel, 2011, Very high cycle fatigue—Is there a fatigue limit?, International Journal of Fatigue, 33, 49, 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.05.009 Murakami, 2002 Collins, 1981 Pascual, 1999, Estimating fatigue curves with the random fatigue-limit model, Technometrics, 41, 277, 10.1080/00401706.1999.10485925 Lorén, 2005, Modelling curved S–N curves, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 28, 437, 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00876.x ASTM Standard E 739-91 (Reapproved 2004). Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress–life (S–N) and strain–life (ε–N). Fatigue data. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 2004. ASTM Standard E 1823-96 (Reapproved 2002). Standard terminology relating to fatigue and fracture testing. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 2002.