Uncertainty guidance in proton therapy planning visualization

Ceneda, 2018, Guidance or no guidance? A decision tree can help, 19 Ceneda, 2019, A review of guidance approaches in visual data analysis: A multifocal perspective, Comput Graph Forum, 38, 861, 10.1111/cgf.13730 Gillmann, 2021, Ten open challenges in medical visualization, IEEE Comput Graph Appl, 41, 7, 10.1109/MCG.2021.3094858 Raidou, 2018, Uncertainty visualization: Recent developments and future challenges in prostate cancer radiotherapy planning, 13 Saw, 2018, External beam planning module of eclipse for external beam radiation therapy, Med Dosim, 43, 195, 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.03.003 Schlachter, 2019, State-of-the-art report: Visual computing in radiation therapy planning, Comput Graph Forum, 38, 753, 10.1111/cgf.13726 Ristovski, 2014, Uncertainty in medical visualization: Towards a taxonomy, Comput Graph, 39, 60, 10.1016/j.cag.2013.10.015 Gillmann, 2021, Uncertainty-aware visualization in medical imaging — A survey, Comput Graph Forum, 40, 665, 10.1111/cgf.14333 Furmanová, 2020, VAPOR: Visual analytics for the exploration of pelvic organ variability in radiotherapy, Comput Graph, 91, 25, 10.1016/j.cag.2020.07.001 Furmanová, 2021, PREVIS: Predictive visual analytics of anatomical variability for radiotherapy decision support, Comput Graph, 97, 126, 10.1016/j.cag.2021.04.010 Suzuki, 2012, Uncertainty in patient set-up margin analysis in radiation therapy, J Radiat Res, 53, 615, 10.1093/jrr/rrs003 Paganetti, 2018, Proton relative biological effectiveness - Uncertainties and opportunities, Int J Part Therapy, 5, 2, 10.14338/IJPT-18-00011.1 Mohan, 2017, Radiobiological issues in proton therapy, Acta Oncol, 56, 1367, 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1348621 Hofmaier, 2020, Variance-based sensitivity analysis for uncertainties in proton therapy: A framework to assess the effect of simultaneous uncertainties in range, positioning and RBE model predictions on RBE-weighted dose distributions, Med Phys, 48, 805, 10.1002/mp.14596 Rørvik, 2018, Exploration and application of phenomenological RBE models for proton therapy, Phys Med Biol, 63, 10.1088/1361-6560/aad9db Kamp, 2019, Application of variance-based uncertainty and sensitivity analysis to biological modeling in carbon ion treatment plans, Med Phys, 46, 437, 10.1002/mp.13306 Otterlei, 2021, Variation in relative biological effectiveness for cognitive structures in proton therapy of pediatric brain tumors, Acta Oncol, 60, 267, 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1840626 Ceneda, 2017 Ceneda, 2020, Guide me in analysis: A framework for guidance designers, Comput Graph Forum, 39, 269, 10.1111/cgf.14017 Ceneda, 2017, Characterizing guidance in visual analytics, IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 23, 111, 10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598468 Sperrle, 2021, Co-adaptive visual data analysis and guidance processes, Comput Graph, 100, 93, 10.1016/j.cag.2021.06.016 Stoiber, 2022, Perspectives of visualization onboarding and guidance in VA, Vis Inf, 6, 68, 10.1016/j.visinf.2022.02.005 Stoiber, 2021, Design and comparative evaluation of visualization onboarding methods, 1, 10.1145/3481549.3481558 Torsney-Weir, 2018, Risk fixers and sweet spotters: A study of the different approaches to using visual sensitivity analysis in an investment scenario, 119 Bögl, 2013, Visual analytics for model selection in time series analysis, IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 19, 2237, 10.1109/TVCG.2013.222 Torsney-Weir, 2015, Decision making in uncertainty visualization, 1 Schlachter, 2020, Principles of visualization in radiation oncology, Oncology, 98, 412, 10.1159/000504940 Budiarto, 2011, A population-based model to describe geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy: Applied to prostate cases, Phys Med Biol, 56, 1045, 10.1088/0031-9155/56/4/011 Berger, 2011, Uncertainty-aware exploration of continuous parameter spaces using multivariate prediction, Comput Graph Forum, 30, 911, 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01940.x Brodlie, 2012, 81, 10.1007/978-1-4471-2804-5_6 Bonneau, 2014, Overview and state-of-the-art of uncertainty visualization, 5, 10.1007/978-1-4471-6497-5_1 Calvert, 2017, Visualisation of uncertainty in probabilistic traffic models for policy and operations, Transportation, 44, 701, 10.1007/s11116-015-9673-3 Belyakov, 2020, Guidance in the visual analytics of cartographic images in the decision-making process, 351 Floricel, 2022, THALIS: Human-machine analysis of longitudinal symptoms in cancer therapy, IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 28, 151, 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114810 Müller, 2020, A visual approach to explainable computerized clinical decision support, Comput Graph, 91, 1, 10.1016/j.cag.2020.06.004 Kamal, 2021, Recent advances and challenges in uncertainty visualization: A survey, J Vis, 24, 861, 10.1007/s12650-021-00755-1 Weissleder, 2011, Chapter 14: Imaging physics, 690 Luciani, 2019, Details-first, show context, overview last: Supporting exploration of viscous fingers in large-scale ensemble simulations, IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 25, 1225, 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864849 Plumlee, 2006, Zooming versus multiple window interfaces: Cognitive costs of visual comparisons, ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact, 13, 179, 10.1145/1165734.1165736 Kehrer, 2013, A model for structure-based comparison of many categories in small-multiple displays, IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 19, 2287, 10.1109/TVCG.2013.122 Tufte, 2001 Wentzel, 2019, Cohort-based T-SSIM visual computing for radiation therapy prediction and exploration, IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 26, 949 Hintze, 1998, Violin plots: A box plot-density trace synergism, Am Stat, 52, 181 Zaghian, 2017, A chance-constrained programming framework to handle uncertainties in radiation therapy treatment planning, Eur J Oper Res, 266, 736, 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.018 Musleh, 2022, Visual analysis of blow molding machine multivariate time series data, J Vis, 25, 1329, 10.1007/s12650-022-00857-4 Wall, 2019, A heuristic approach to value-driven evaluation of visualizations, IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 25, 491, 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865146 Brooke, 1996, SUS–A quick and dirty usability scale, Usability Eval Ind, 189, 4 Lam, 2012, Empirical studies in information visualization: Seven scenarios, IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph, 18, 1520, 10.1109/TVCG.2011.279 Stitz, 2016, AVOCADO: Visualization of workflow–derived data provenance for reproducible biomedical research, Comput Graph Forum, 35, 481, 10.1111/cgf.12924