Uncertainty analysis of hydroelastic responses and wave loads for different structural modeling and potential methods

Chen, 2017, Time-domain numerical and segmented ship model experimental analyses of hydroelastic responses of a large container ship in oblique regular waves, Appl. Ocean Res., 67, 78, 10.1016/j.apor.2017.07.005 Chen, 2015, Hydroelastic analysis of effect of various nonlinear factors on load responses Chen, 2019, Rankine source method analysis for nonlinear hydroelastic responses of a container ship in regular oblique waves, Ocean. Eng., 187, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106168 Hirdaris, 2014, Loads for use in the design of ships and offshore structures, Ocean. Eng., 78, 131, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.09.012 Hirdaris, 2016, The influence of nonlinearities on the symmetric hydrodynamic response of a 10,000 TEU Container ship, Ocean. Eng., 111, 166, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.049 Hirdaris, 2003, Two- and three-dimensional hydroelastic modelling of a bulker in regular waves, Mar. Struct., 16, 627, 10.1016/j.marstruc.2004.01.005 Hirdaris, 2009, Hydroelasticity of ships: recent advances and future trends, Proc. IME M J. Eng. Marit. Environ., 223, 305 Ittc, 2008, The specialist committee on uncertainty analysis Jiao, 2019, Time-domain numerical and segmented model experimental study on ship hydroelastic responses and whipping loads in harsh irregular seaways, Ocean. Eng., 185, 59, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.039 Kim, 2015, Comparison of slamming and whipping loads by fully coupled hydroelastic analysis and experimental measurement, J. Fluid Struct., 52, 145, 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.10.011 Kim, 2016, Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership, Ocean. Eng., 119, 262, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.015 Lee, 2012, Comparison of springing and whipping responses of model tests with predicted nonlinear hydroelastic analyses, Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 22, 453 Li, 2018, Springing responses analysis and segmented model test on a 550,000 dead weight tonnage ore carrier, J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 140, 10.1115/1.4039160 Lin, 2020, Experimental study on the asymmetric impact loads and hydroelastic responses of a very large container ship, International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 12, 226, 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2019.09.005 Malenica, 2006, An efficient hydroelastic model for wave induced coupled torsional and horizontal ship vibrations Riesner, 2016, Prediction of non-linear ship responses in waves considering forward speed effects, Ship Technol. Res., 63, 135, 10.1080/09377255.2016.1221607 Senjanović, 2014, Some aspects of structural modelling and restoring stiffness in hydroelastic analysis of large container ships, Ships Offshore Struct., 9, 199, 10.1080/17445302.2012.762728 Sheng, 2004, 393~395 Shin, 2015, Two- and three-dimensional springing analysis of a 16,000 TEU container ship in regular waves, Ships Offshore Struct., 10, 498 Si, 2020 Storhaug, 2007, 247 Wang, 2012 Wang, 2010, Study on the testing technology of wave-induced loads of catamarans, Ship Science and Technology, 32, 28 Wang, 2016, Investigation of springing in ship structures using experimental methods and 3-D hydroelastic theory, J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 21, 271, 10.1007/s00773-015-0350-1 Wang, 2016, Investigation of hydroelastic ship responses of an ULOC in Head Seas, China Ocean Eng., 30, 687, 10.1007/s13344-016-0044-4 Wu, 1984 Yang, 2018, 3D nonlinear hydroelastic response and load prediction of a large bulk carrier in time domain, J. Ship Mech., 22, 1495 Yang, 2019, Application of the 3D time-domain Green's function for finite water depth in hydroelastic mechanics, Ocean. Eng., 189, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106386 Yang, 2020, Irregular frequency elimination of three-dimensional hydroelasticity in frequency domain, Ocean. Eng., 196, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106817 Zhao, 2017, Design of open backbone of segmented model for wave load experiment, Ship & Ocean Engineering, 46, 7 Zhu, 2011, Experimental investigation of hull girder vibrations of a flexible backbone model in bending and torsion, Appl. Ocean Res., 33, 252, 10.1016/j.apor.2011.08.001