Uncertainty analysis for pedotransfer functions

European Journal of Soil Science - Tập 53 Số 3 - Trang 417-429 - 2002
Budiman Minasny1, A. B. Mc Bratney1
1Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, The University of Sydney, Ross St, Building A03, NSW 2006, Australia

Tóm tắt

SummaryBoth empirical and process‐simulation models are useful in predicting the outcome of agricultural management on soil quality and vice versa, and pedotransfer functions have been developed to translate readily available soil information into variables that are needed in the models. The input data are subject to error, and consequently the transfer functions can produce varied outputs. A general approach to quantifying the resulting uncertainty is to use Monte Carlo methods. By sampling repeatedly from the assumed probability distributions of the input variables and evaluating the response of the model, the statistical distribution of the outputs can be estimated. Methods for sampling the probability distribution include simple random sampling, the sectioning method, and Latin hypercube sampling. The Latin hypercube sampling is applied to the quantification of uncertainties in pedotransfer functions of soil strength and soil hydraulic properties. Hydraulic properties predicted using recently developed pedotransfer functions are also used in a model to analyse the uncertainties in the prediction of soil‐water regimes in the field. The uncertainties of hydraulic properties in soil‐water simulation show that the model is sensitive to the soil's moisture state.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900060007x

10.1007/978-1-4612-3532-3_4

10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00345-6

Cochran W.G., 1977, Sampling Techniques

Computational Science Education Project, 1995, Introduction to Monte Carlo Methods.

10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100030023x

10.1007/BF00897749

De Wit C.T., 1973, Simulation of Transport Processes in Soils

10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000060013x

Gee G.W., 1986, Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 383

Gentle J.E., 1982, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, 612

10.1111/j.1475-2743.1999.tb00083.x

10.4324/9780203016114

10.1111/j.1365-2389.1976.tb02011.x

Iman R.L., 1992, Reliability Technology ASME 1992, 153

10.1080/03610918208812265

10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00086-5

MathSoft, 1999, S‐Plus 2000 User's Guide.

10.2307/1268522

10.1071/SR99110

10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00061-0

10.1080/00401706.1999.10485930

Richards L.A., 1965, Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 128

10.1097/00010694-199810000-00001

Smith M., 1991, Expert Consultation on Revision of FAO Methodologies for Crop Water Requirements.

10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800040033x

10.1080/00401706.1987.10488205

10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00227-4

Van Dam J.C., 1997, SWAP Version 2.0, Theory. Simulation of Water Flow, Solute Transport and Plant Growth in the Soil–Water–Atmosphere–Plant Environment.

10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600050007x

10.2172/573301