Ultrasonography and Doppler Study to Predict Uterine Receptivity in Infertile Patients Undergoing Embryo Transfer

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India - Tập 66 Số S1 - Trang 377-382 - 2016
Mohd. Shahid Khan1, Aneesa Shaikh1, Rekha Ratnani2
1Aneesa Infertility Centre, Navi Mumbai, India
2Apollo BSR Hospitals, Junwani Road, Bhilai, 490020, India

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, et al. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(5):1144–7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh870 .

Applebaum M. The uterine biophysical profile. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5(1):67–8.

Noyes N, Hampton BS, Berkeley A, et al. Factors useful in predicting the success of oocyte donation: a 3-year retrospective analysis. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(1):92–7.

Kovacs P, Matyas S, Boda K, et al. The effect of endometrial thickness on IVF/ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(11):2337–41.

Okohue JE, Onuh SO, Ebeigbe P, et al. The effect of endometrial thickness on in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Afr J Reprod Health. 2009;13(1):113–21.

Casper RF. It’s time to pay attention to the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(3):519–21. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1096 .

Zhang X, Chen CH, Confino E, et al. Increased endometrial thickness is associated with improved treatment outcome for selected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(2):336–40.

Merc LT, Barco MJ, Bau S. 2D and 3D power Doppler ultrasound of endometrium as implantation marker. Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;2(2):1–11. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1052 .

Zhao J, Zhang Q, Li Y. The effect of endometrial thickness and pattern measured by ultrasonography on pregnancy outcomes during IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;28(10):100. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-100 .

Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, et al. Endometrial and subendometrial vascularity is higher in pregnant patients with livebirth following ART than in those who suffer a miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(4):1134–41.

Wang L, Qiao J, Li R, et al. Role of endometrial blood flow assessment with color Doppler energy in predicting pregnancy outcome of IVF-ET cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;18(8):122. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-122 .

Malhotra N, Malhotra J, Malhotra N, et al. Endometrial receptivity and scoring for prediction of implantation and newer markers. Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;4(4):439–46.

Chien LW, Au HK, Chen PL, et al. Assessment of uterine receptivity by the endometrial-subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(2):245–51.

Bhadauriaa K, Sahnib R, Vermab S, et al. Colour Doppler ultrasound in controlled ovarian stimulation with intrauterine insemination. Apollo Med J. 2012;9(3):252–62.

Maugey-Laulon B, Commenges-Ducos M, Jullien V, et al. Endometrial vascularity and ongoing pregnancy after IVF. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;104(2):137–43.

Tekay A, Martikainen H, Jouppilas P. The clinical value of transvaginal colour Doppler ultrasound in assisted reproductive technology procedures. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(8):1589–91.

Dechaund H, Bessueille E, Bousquet PJ, et al. Optimal timing of ultrasonographic and Doppler evaluation of uterine receptivity to implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16(3):368–75.