Ultrasonographic findings of missed breast cancer: pitfalls and pearls

Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology. 2009;252:665–72.

Uematsu T. How to choose needles and probes for ultrasonographically guided percutaneous breast biopsy: a systematic approach. Breast Cancer. 2012;19:238–41.

O’Flynn EA, Wilson AR, Michell MJ. Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:259–70.

Liberman L. Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1191–9.

Skaane P, Sauer T. Ultrasonography of malignant breast neoplasms. Analysis of carcinomas missed as tumor. Acta Radiol. 1999;40:376–82.

College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System® (BI-RADS®). 4th edn. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.

Kim MJ, Kim JY, Yoon JH, et al. How to find an isoechoic lesion with breast US. Radiographics. 2011;31:663–76.

Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196:123–34.

Kopans DB. Interpreting the mammogram. In: Kopans DB, editor. Breast imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 365–480.

Park JM, Yang L, Laroia A, Franken EA Jr, Fajardo LL. Missed and/or misinterpreted lesions in breast ultrasound: reasons and solutions. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2011;62:41–9.

Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Madsen EL, ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Radiology. 2006;239:693–702.

Sohn C, Blohmer JU, Hamper UM. Breast ultrasound. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 1999.

Morris EA. Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45:863–80.

Kuhl CK. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part 1. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology. 2007;244:356–78.

Leung JW. Utility of second-look ultrasound in the evaluation of MRI-detected breast lesions. Semin Roentgenol. 2011;46:260–74.

Uematsu T. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography for evaluating intraductal tumor extension of breast cancer. Jpn J Radiol. 2010;28:563–70.

Nakano S, Kousaka J, Fujii K, et al. Impact of real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses an image fusion technique, on the sonographic evaluation of MRI-detected lesions of the breast in second-look sonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:1179–88.

Uematsu T, Kasami M. MR imaging findings of benign and malignant circumscribed breast masses: part 1. Solid circumscribed masses. Jpn J Radiol. 2009;27:395–404.

Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S. Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings. Radiology. 2009;250:638–47.

Cho N, Jang M, Lyou CY, Park JS, Choi HY, Moon WK. Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color doppler US–influence on radiologist accuracy. Radiology. 2012;262:80–90.

Taskin F, Koseoglu K, Ozbas S, Erkus M, Karaman C. Sonographic features of histopathologically benign solid breast lesions that have been classified as BI-RADS 4 on sonography. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012;40:261–5.

Uematsu T. Non-mass-like lesions on breast ultrasonography: a systematic review. Breast Cancer. 2012;19:295–301.

Hsu HH, Yu JC, Hsu GC, et al. Ultrasonographic alterations associated with the dilatation of mammary ducts: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:293–302.