UTASTAR method and its application in multi-criteria warehouse location selection

Mohammad Ehsanifar1, David A. Wood2, Arezoo Babaie1
1Department of Industrial Engineering, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
2DWA Energy Limited, Lincoln, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alberto P (2015) The logistics of industrial location decisions: an application of the analytic hierarchy process methodology. Int J Log Res Appl 3(3):273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/713682767

Askin RG, Baffo I, Xia M (2014) Multicommodity warehouse location and distribution planning with inventory consideration. Int J Prod Res 52(7):1897–1910. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.787171

Badri MA (1999) Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem. Int J Prod Econ 62(3):237–248

Beuthe M, Scannella G (2001) Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods. Eur J Oper Res 130(2):246–262

Canbolat YB, Chelst K, Garg N (2007) Combining decision tree and MAUT for selecting a country for a global manufacturing facility. Omega 35(3):312–325

Cebi F, Otay I (2015) MultiCriteria and MultiStage facility location selection under interval Type2 fuzzy environment: a case study for a cement factory. Int J Comput Intell Syst 8(2):330–344.I

Chai J, Liu JN, Ngai EW (2013) Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst Appl 40(10):3872–3885

Demirel T, Demirel NÇ, Kahraman C (2010) Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral. Expert Syst Appl 37(5):3943–3952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.022

Dey B, Bairagi B, Sarkar B, Sanyal SK (2016) Warehouse location selection by fuzzy multicriteria decision making methodologies based on subjective and objective criteria. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 11(4):262–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2015.1086964

Efroymson M, Ray T (1966) A branch-bound algorithm for plant location. Oper Res 14(3):361–368

Ehsanifar M, Eshlaghi AT, Keramati MA, Nazemi J (2013) The development of UTASTAR method in fuzzy environment for supplier selection Editors-in-Chief. Eur J Res 108:317–326

Farahani RZ, SteadieSeifi M, Asgari N (2010) Multiple criteria facility location problems: a survey. Appl Math Model 34(7):1689–1709

Frazelle E (2002) Supply chain strategy: the logistics of supply chain management. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

Jacquet-Lagrèze E, Siskos Y (1982) Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method. Eur J Oper Res 10(2):151–164

Kabak M, Keskin İ (2018) Hazardous materials warehouse selection based on GIS and MCDM. Arab J Sci Eng 43(6):3269–3278

Karmaker C, Saha M (2015) Optimization of warehouse location through fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods. Decis Sci Lett 4(3):315–334

Khumawala BM (1972) An efficient branch and bound algorithm for the warehouse location problem. Manag Sci 18(12):B-718–B-731

Korpela J, Lehmusvaara A, Nisonen J (2007) Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologie. Int J Prod Econ 108(1–2):135–142

Kuehn AA, Hamburger MJ (1963) A heuristic program for locating warehouses. Manag Sci 9(4):643–666

Ma Y, Su X, Zhao Y (2018) Hybrid multi-attribute decision making methods: an application. Tehnički vjesnik 25(5):1421–1428

Mi, X., Liao, H., & Al-Barakati, A. (2020). Integrating the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis with the MULTIMOORA method for multiple criteria decision making. In: Xu J, Ahmed S, Cooke F, Duca G (eds) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. ICMSEM 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1001. Springer, Cham

Mihajlović J, Rajković P, Petrović G, Ćirić D (2019) The selection of the logistics distribution center location based on MCDM methodology in southern and eastern region in Serbia. Oper Res Eng Sci Theory Appl 2(2):72–85

Owen SH, Daskin MS (1998) Strategic facility location: a review. Eur J Oper Res 111(3):423–447

Özcan T, Çelebi N, Esnaf Ş (2011) Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9773–9779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.022

Pamučar D, Božanić D (2019) Selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics center: application of single-valued neutrosophic MABAC model. Oper Res Eng Sci Theory Appl 2(2):55–71

Patiniotakis A, Apostolou D, Mentzas G (2011) Fuzzy UTASTAR: A method for discovering utility functions from fuzzy data. Expert Syst Appl 38(12):15463–15474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.014

Seker, S. (2019). Site selection for solar power plants using integrated two-stage hybrid method based on intuitionistic fuzzy AHP and COPRAS approach. In: International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (pp. 616-624). Springer: Cham

Siskos Y, Yannacopoulos D (1985) UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigação Operacional 5(1):39–53

Siskos Y, Grigoroudis E, Matsatsinis NF (2005) UTA methods Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (pp: 297–334): Springer

Stevenson WJ (1993) Production/operations management. McGraw-Hill Company, New York

Tellier L-N (1972) The Weber problem: solution and interpretation. Geogr Anal 4(3):215–233

Tuzkaya G, Önüt S, Tuzkaya UR, Gülsün B (2008) An analytic network process approach for locating undesirable facilities: an example from Istanbul, Turkey. J Environ Manag 88(4):970–983

Uysal F, Tosun Ö (2014) Selection of sustainable warehouse location in supply chain using the grey approach. Int J Inf Decis Sci 6(4):338–353

Vlachopoulou M, Silleos G, Manthou V (2001) Geographic information systems in warehouse site selection decisions. Int J Prod Econ 71(1–3):205–212

Weber A, Friedrich CJ (1929) Alfred Weber’s theory of the location of industries. Chicago, Ill., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Yerlikaya MA, Tabak Ç, Yıldız K (2019) Logistic location selection with Critic-Ahp and Vikor integrated approach. Data Sci Appl 2(1):21–25