U.S. policy in the UN environmental arena: powerful laggard or constructive leader?
Tóm tắt
As the world’s one remaining superpower, the United States stands forth as a hegemon in international politics. Within the traditional realist perspective, this means that the U.S. is decisive for the ambition and scope of international cooperation. However, research has shown that there is limited empirical support for this assumption when it comes to environmental cooperation. After a brief look at the U.S. general attitude and perception of the UN, this paper will then review general trends in U.S. foreign environmental policy within the United Nations context, including several key domestic factors that have influenced the U.S. in this area. I will then look more specifically at three UN institutions that are responsible for different aspects of environmental governance: United Nations global conferences (Stockholm in 1972, Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and Johannesburg in 2002), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD). The main focus will be how U.S. policies and influence in these arenas, and their relationship to UN reform, have evolved over time. Finally, the paper will attempt to analyze the American policies and answer the question posed in the title: is the U.S. a powerful laggard or a constructive leader?
Tài liệu tham khảo
Albright, M. (1995). Statement by Ambassador Madeleine K. Albright, U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations, at the Foreign Press Center on the Opening of the 50th UNGA, September 22, 1995. Retrieved March 9, 2007, from http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/intlorg/UN50th/950922.html
Benedick, R. E. (1987). The environmental agenda and foreign policy—John D. Negroponte’s address and Richard E. Benedick’s address before the State Department Symposium on April 16, 1987. U.S. Department of State Bulletin (July).
Bigg T., & Dodds, F. (1997). The UN Commission on Sustainable Development. In F. Dodds (Ed.), The way forward: Beyond Agenda 21 (pp. 15–36). London: Earthscan.
Blumenauer, E. (2002). United States should participate in the United Nations World Summit for Sustainable Development. Congressional Record—House (9 September 2002), H6111.
Bolton, J. R. (1999). Reject and oppose the International Criminal Court. In R. Wedgwood, et al. (Eds.), Towards an International Criminal Court? (pp. 26–36). New York: Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved March 11, 2007, from http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/International_Criminal_Court.pdf
Bramble, B. J., & Porter, G. (1992). Non-governmental organizations and the making of U.S. international environmental policy. In A. Hurrell & B. Kingsbury (Eds.), The international politics of the environment (pp. 313–353). New York: Oxford.
Brunnée, J. (2004). The United States and international environmental law: Living with an elephant. European Journal of International Law, 15(4), 617–649.
Bush, G. H. W. (1992). Annual report of the Council on Environmental Quality–Message from the President–PM 188 (Senate—March 24, 1992). Congressional Record (24 March 1992), S4094–S4096.
Chasek, P. S., Downie, D. L., & Brown, J. W. (2006). Global environmental politics (4th ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
Dobriansky, P. (2002a). Vision statement for the World Summit on Sustainable Development. U.S. Department of State press release (23 May 2002). Retrieved March 8, 2007, from http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2002/10442.htm
Dobriansky, P. (2002b). The World Summit on Sustainable Development: Beginning a new chapter in sustainable development history. Global Issues: Achieving Sustainable Development 7(1), 8–9. Retrieved March 8, 2007, from http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itgic/0402/ijge/gj02.htm
Falkner, R. (2005). American hegemony and the global environment. International Studies Review 4(7), 585–599.
Foot, R., MacFarlane, S. N., & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.). (2003). U.S. hegemony and international organizations. New York: Oxford.
Harris, P. G. (Ed.) (2001). The environment, international relations and U.S. foreign policy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Heimer, M. (1998). The UN Environment Programme: Thinking globally, retreating locally. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 1. Retrieved March 11, 2007, from http://islandia.law.yale.edu/yhrdlj/pdf/Vol%201/Matthew_Heimer_YHRDLJ.pdf
Heritage Foundation. (1991). Guidelines for the U.N. environmental conference: A United Nations assessment project study. (Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation), as cited in P. Shabecoff (1996). A new name for peace. (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England).
Hierlmeier, J. (2002). UNEP: Retrospect and prospect—options for reforming the global environmental governance regime. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 14(4), 767–807.
Hoffmann, S. (2002). The United States and international organizations. In R. J. Lieber (Ed.), Eagle rules: Foreign policy and American primacy in the twenty-first century (pp. 342–352). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hopgood, S. (1998). American foreign environmental policy and the power of the state. New York: Oxford.
Hopgood, S. (2003). Looking beyond the ‘K-Word’: Embedded multilateralism in American foreign environmental policy. In R. Foot, S. N. MacFarlane, & M. Mastanduno (Eds.), U.S. hegemony and international organizations (pp. 139–164). New York: Oxford.
IISD-RS (International Institute for Sustainable Development—Reporting Services). (1993). Summary of the first session of the Commission on Sustainable Development: 14–25 June 1993. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 5(12). Retrieved March 11, 2007, from http://www.iisd.ca/vol05/0512000e.html
Ivanova, M. (2005). Assessing UNEP as anchor institution for the global environment: Lessons for the UNEO debate. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy Working Paper 05/01. Retrieved March 11, 2007, from http://www.yale.edu/envirocenter/UNEO-wp.pdf
Kimble, M. (1998). Statement by Melinda Kimble, Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans, Environment and Science, in the Sixth Session of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development. USUN Press Release 82 (98). Retrieved March 11, 2007, from http://www.un.int/usa/98_82.htm
Kotis, S. (2005). Explanation of position by Samuel Kotis, Adviser, on draft resolution A/C.2/60/L.60: Report of the Governing Council of the UN Environment Programme, in the Second Committee. USUN Press Release #244 (05). Retrieved March 11, 2007, from http://www.un.int/usa/05_244.htm
Mally, A. (2005). Explanation of position by Alec Mally, Counselor, on draft resolution: Toward global partnerships, in the Second Committee, December 15, 2005. USUN Press Release #261 (5). Retrieved March 11, 2007, from http://www.un.int/usa/05_261.htm
Margolis, J. (2005). Opening remarks at the thirteenth session of the Commission on Sustainable Development. Retrieved March 11, 2007, from http://www.state.gov/g/oes/rls/rm/44557.htm
Nye, J. S. Jr. (1990). Soft power. Foreign Policy 80(Autumn), 153–171.
Nye, J. S. Jr. (2002). The paradox of American power: Why the world’s only superpower can’t go it alone. New York: Oxford.
Paarlberg, R. (2002). The eagle and the global environment: The burden of being essential. In R. J. Lieber (Ed.), Eagle rules: Foreign policy and American primacy in the twenty-first century (pp. 324–341). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Patrick, S. (2002). Multilateralism and U.S. foreign policy: Ambivalent engagement. (Remarks at the Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs, New York, New York). Retrieved on March 11, 2007, from http://www.cceia.org/resources/transcripts/127.html
Pearce, F. (1997) Environment body goes to pieces. New Scientist (15 February) 1111.
Powell, C. L. (2002). Making sustainable development work: Governance, finance, and public–private cooperation. (State Department Conference, Meridian International Center, Washington, DC). Retrieved on March 9, 1997 from http://www.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2002/11822.htm
Puchala, D. J. (2005). World hegemony and the United Nations. International Studies Review 4(7), 571–584.
Rogers, W. P. (1972). United States international environmental initiative. Memo to President Richard M. Nixon, as cited in S. Hopgood (1998). American foreign environmental policy and the power of the state. New York: Oxford.
Shabecoff, P. (1996). A new name for peace. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
Sherman, R., Peer, J., Dodds, F., & Figueroa Küpcü, M. (2006). Strengthening the Johannesburg implementation track (London: Stakeholder Forum). Retrieved on March 11, 2007, from http://www.stakeholderforum.org/CSDAprilReport.pdf
Siv, S. (2005). Statement by Ambassador Sichan Siv, Alternate U.S. Representative to the General Assembly, on Agenda Item 52: Sustainable Development, in the Second Committee, USUN Press Release #206 (05). Retrieved March 22, 2007, from http://www.un.int/usa/05_206.htm
Skodvin, T., & Andresen, S. (2006). Leadership revisited. Global Environmental Politics 6(3), 13–27.
Speth, J. G. (2003). Perspectives on the Johannesburg Summit. Environment 45(1), 24–29.
Train, R. E. (1972). Memorandum for the President on the UN Conference on the Human Environment.
Underdal, A. (1994). Leadership theory: Rediscovering the arts of management. In I. W. Zartman (Ed.), International multilateral negotiation: Approaches to the management of complexity (pp. 178–197). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Upton, S. (2000). Roadblocks to Agenda 21: A government perspective. In F. Dodds (Ed.), Earth Summit 2002: A new deal (pp. 3–20). London: Earthscan.
U.S. State Department (1972). United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, June 5–16, 1972: Scope Paper. Congressional Record (25 May 1972) Daily ed. pp. S18954–S18956.
U.S. State Department (2005). State department daily briefing. Transcript. Retrieved March 11, 2007, from http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p = washfile-english&y = 2005&m = February&x = 20050225185412ESnamfuaK0.2265436.
U.S.UN (United States Mission to the United Nations) (2003). Discussion papers on the future of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development. Retrieved on March 11, 2007 from http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/16952.pdf
Wagner, L. (2005). A Commission will lead them?: The UN Commission on Sustainable Development and UNCED follow-up. In G. Sjöstedt, E. Corell & A. Churie Kallhauge (Eds.), Global challenges: Furthering the multilateral policy process (pp. 103–122). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
Wapner, P. (2003). World Summit on Sustainable Development: Toward a post-Jo’burg environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 3(1), 1–10.
Winnick, S. (1998). Statement by Seth Winnick, Deputy United States Representative on the United Nations Economic and Social Council, on Agenda Item 13: Sustainable development and environment, in the 1998 substantive session of the Economic and Social Council. Press Release #135 (98). Retrieved on March 11, 2007, from http://www.un.int/usa/98_135.htm
Young, O. (1991). Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization 45(3), 281–309.