Two perspectives on supply chain resilience
Tóm tắt
More than a decade ago, other fields started to challenge the equilibrium‐focused meaning of resilience. They suggested that resilience does not just relate to the ability of a system to “bounce back” after an impeding event, but also to the capacity to adapt and transform. The operations and supply chain management literature remains surprisingly disconnected from these debates. This essay sets out to further our theoretical knowledge of what resilience means (or means to others) by disentangling two prominent perspectives of resilience—engineering resilience and social‐ecological resilience—and offering an updated definition of supply chain resilience. We integrate and discuss these perspectives in the context of our understanding of the supply chain as a system. The goal is to outline the potential links and inconsistencies of these perspectives with supply chain management (SCM). From there, we seek to develop a more comprehensive understanding of what resilience means in SCM. Supply chain resilience is then no longer understood in terms of stability, but in terms of adaptation and transformation.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
Christopher M., 2016, Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Holling C.S., 1986, The Development of Ecological Economics
Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering Within Ecological Constraints, 31
Holling C.S., 2002, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature, 25
Sheffi Y., 2005, A Supply Chain View of the Resilient Enterprise, MIT Sloan Management Review, 47, 41
Simchi‐Levi D., 2014, From Superstorms to Factory Fires: Managing Unpredictable Supply Chain Disruptions, Harvard Business Review, 92, 96
Westley F., 2002, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature, 103