Tutorial facilitation in the humanities based on the tenets of Carl Rogers
Tóm tắt
This article introduces a model for group facilitation in the humanities based on Carl Roger’s model for group psychotherapy. Certain aspects of Carl Roger’s reflective learning strategies are reappraised and principles, specific only to psychotherapy, are introduced. Five of Rogers’s axioms are applied to the tutorial discussion model: a non-directive approach, climate-setting, facilitation, reflective listening and positive regard. The model, which has been trialed in tutorials at The University of Queensland encourages active learning, self-direction and critical thinking.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abercrombie, J. (1984). Changing higher education by the application of some group-analytic ideas. Paper to 8th Annual Conference of Group Psychotherapy, Mexico City.
Aspy, D. (1969). The effects of teacher-offered conditions of empathy, positive regard, and congruence on students achievement. Florida Journal of Educational Research, 11, 39–48.
Aspy, D. (1972). Toward a technology for humanizing education. Champaign: Research Press.
Barrows, H. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Blackie, M., Case, J., & Jawitz, J. (2010). Student-centeredness: The link between transforming students and transforming ourselves. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 637–646.
Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Burnard, P. (2002). Carl Rogers and postmodernism: Challenges in nursing and health sciences. Nursing and Health Sciences, 1(4), 241–247.
Clouston, T. (2005). Facilitating tutorials in problem-based learning: Student’s perspectives. In P. Hartley, A. Woods, & M. Pill (Eds.), Enhancing teaching in higher education (pp. 48–58). London and New York: Routledge.
Cowan, J. (2006). On becoming an innovative university teacher. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Exley, K., & Dennick, R. (2004). Small group teaching: Tutorials, seminars and beyond. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Griffiths, S. (2003). Teaching and learning in small groups. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 91–105). London: Kogan Page.
Hall, J., & Saunders, P. (1997). Adopting a student-centered approach to management of learning. In C. Bell, M. Bowden, & A. Trott (Eds.), Implementing flexible learning. London: Kogan Page.
Heron, J. (1993). Group facilitation. London: Kogan Page.
Kirschenbaum, H., & Land Henderson, V. (Eds.). (1989). The Carl Rogers reader. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs: Cambridge Adult Education.
Kolb, D. (1983). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Lea, S. J., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes to student centered learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’? Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 321–334.
Long, H. B. (1995). New dimensions in self-directed learning. Norman: Public Managers Center, Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Dept., College of Education, University of Oklahoma.
Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McGill, I., & Beaty, L. (2001). Action learning: A guide for professional, management and educational development. London: Kogan Page.
Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humour as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humour in communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310–331.
Miflen, B. (2004). Small groups and problem-based learning: Are we singing from the same hymn sheet? Medical Teacher, 26(5), 444–450.
Moust, J. H. C., Van Berkel, H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2005). Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem-based learning at Maastricht University. Higher Education, 50(4), 665–683.
Perrenet, J. C., Bouhuijs, P. A. J., & Smits, J. G. M. M. (2000). The suitability of problem-based learning for engineering education: Theory and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(3), 345–358.
Prosser, M., Martin, E., & Trigwell, K. (2007). Academics’ experiences of teaching and of their subject matter. In N. Entwhistle & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Student learning and university teaching. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
Rogers, C. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 22, 95–110.
Rogers, C. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80s. Columbus: Merrill.
Rowland, S. (2000). The enquiring university teacher. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Silén, C. (2006). The tutors approach in base learning. Higher Education, 51, 373–385.
Spronken-Smith, R. (2005). Implementing a problem-based learning approach for teaching research methods in geography. Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 203–221.
Vermunt, J. (2007). The power of teaching-learning environments to influence student learning. In N. Entwhistle & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Student learning and university teaching. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.