Turkey’s Twitter public diplomacy: Towards a “new” cult of personality

Public Relations Review - Tập 45 - Trang 101837 - 2019
Nur Uysal1, Jared Schroeder2
1College of Communication, DePaul University, 14 E. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1245, Chicago, IL, 60604, United States
2Southern Methodist University, Meadows School of the Arts, P.O. Box 750356, Dallas, TX, 75275, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aydintasbas, 2017 Baev, 2017 Beesly, 2017 Benhaïm, 2015, The rise and fall of Turkey’s soft power discourse. Discourse in foreign policy under Davutoğlu and Erdoğan, European Journal of Turkish Studies. Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey, 21 Cassiday, 2010, Putin, putiniana and the question of a post-soviet cult of personality, Slavonic and East European Review, 88, 681, 10.1353/see.2010.0059 Castells, 2008 Cowan, 2008, Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 10, 10.1177/0002716207311863 Dodd, 2017, Public relations message strategies and public diplomacy 2.0: An empirical analysis using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitter accounts, Public Relations Review, 43, 417, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.004 Fisher, 2012 Fitzpatrick, 2007, Advancing the new public diplomacy: A public relations perspective, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 2, 187, 10.1163/187119007X240497 Huijgh, 2011, Changing tunes for public diplomacy: Exploring the domestic dimension, Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy, 2, 6 Huijgh, 2016 Iğsiz, 2014, From alliance of civilizations to branding the nation: Turkish studies, image wars and politics of comparison in an age of neoliberalism, Turkish Studies, 15, 689, 10.1080/14683849.2014.983689 Internet World Stats, 2018 Jacinto, 2017 Kalın, 2011, Soft power and public diplomacy in Turkey, Perceptions, 16, 5 Kent, 2013, Using social media dialogically: Public relations role in reviving democracy, Public Relations Review, 39, 337, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.024 Kent, 2002, Toward a dialogic theory of public relations, Public Relations Review, 28, 21, 10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X Kim, 2018 Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 L’Etang, 2009, Public relations and diplomacy in a globalized world: An issue of public communication, The American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 607, 10.1177/0002764209347633 Lombard, 2002, Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability, Human Communication Research, 28, 587, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x Martin, 2012 Marche, 2017 Melissen, 2005, The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice, 3 Melissen, 2018 Nye, 2004 Nye, 2014 Özcan, 2016 Plamper, 2012 Sevin, 2015, Pathways of connection: An analytical approach to the impacts of public diplomacy, Public Relations Review, 41, 562, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.07.003 Srivastava, 2017 Statista, 2018 Statista, 2018 Strauß, 2015, Digital diplomacy in GCC countries: Strategic communication of Western embassies on Twitter, Government Information Quarterly, 32, 369, 10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.001 Strong, 2011, Stalin the charismatic leader?: Explaining the’ Cult of Personality’ as a legitimation technique, Politics Religion & Ideology, 12, 391, 10.1080/21567689.2011.624410 Su, 2015, Twitplomacy: Social media as a new platform for development of public diplomacy, International Journal of E-Politics (IJEP), 6, 16, 10.4018/IJEP.2015010102 Taylor, 2014, Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts, Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 384, 10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106 Troianovski, 2018 Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2018 Twiplomacy Study, 2018 Uysal, 2012, Social media and soft power: Positioning Turkey’s image on Twitter, Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 5, 338, 10.1163/18739865-00503013 Waters, 2011, Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: Analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter, Journal of Public Affairs, 11, 353, 10.1002/pa.385 Werz, 2017, The European Union and Turkey in 2017: Move On or Apart? Wright, 2013, What is character and why it really does matter, Business Faculty Publications, 42, 25 Yang, 2012, Beyond a dyadic approach to public diplomacy: Understanding relationships in multipolar world, Public Relations Review, 38, 652, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.07.005 Yun, 2009, Future sociological public diplomacy and the role of public relations: Evolution of public diplomacy, The American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 493, 10.1177/0002764209347626 Yang, 2012, Beyond a dyadic approach to public diplomacy: Understanding relationships in multipolar world, Public Relations Review, 38, 652, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.07.005 Zaharna, 2009, Mapping out a spectrum of public diplomacy, Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, 86 Zaharna, 2015, Going for the jugular: The challenge from the 4th quadrant of a relational public diplomacy model, Public Relations Review, 42, 378 Zaharna, 2018, Global engagement: Culture and communication insights from public diplomacy, The Handbook of Communication Engagement, 311, 10.1002/9781119167600.ch21 Zaharna, 2014, Introduction: The connective mindshift, 15