Trustworthy Nanotechnology: Risk, Engagement and Responsibility

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 5 - Trang 49-56 - 2011
Bjørn K. Myskja1
1Department of Philosophy, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Tài liệu tham khảo

Elster J (2007) Explaining social behaviour: more nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New York Gibbons M (1999) Science’s new social contract with society. Nature 402:C81–C84 Grimen H (2009) Hva er tillit? Universitetsforlaget, Oslo Hardin R (1996) Trustworthiness. Ethics 107:26–42 Hardin R (2006) Trust. Polity, Cambridge Kant I (1983) What is enlightenment. In: Kant I (ed) Perpetual peace and other essays. Hackett, Indianapolis, pp 41–46 Løgstrup KE (1956) Den Etiske Fordring. Gyldendal, København Luhmann N (1968) Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Ferdinan Enke, Stuttgart O’Neill O (2002) Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge O’Neill O (2006) Transparency and the ethics of communication. In: Hood C, Heald D (eds) Transparency—the key to better governance? Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 75–90 Pogge T (2002) World poverty and human rights. Polity, Cambridge Royal Society & Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. Royal Society, London, Retrieved March 12, 2011, from http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm Weckert J (2005) Trust in cyberspace. In: Cavalier RJ (ed) The impact of the internet on our moral lives. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 95–117