Trials of mechanical circulatory support with percutaneous axial flow pumps in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: Mission impossible?

Kolte, 2014, Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States, J Am Heart Assoc, 3, e000590, 10.1161/JAHA.113.000590 Goldberg, 2016, Decade-Long Trends (2001–2011) in the Incidence and Hospital Death Rates Associated with the In-Hospital Development of Cardiogenic Shock after Acute Myocardial Infarction, Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 9, 117, 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002359 Ko, 2016, Controversies and Challenges in the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock, Interv Cardiol Clin, 5, 541 Truesdell, 2018, “Combat” Approach to Cardiogenic Shock, Interv Cardiol, 13, 81 Engstrom, 2011, The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: the Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience, Crit Care Med, 39, 2072, 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821e89b5 Shah, 2018, Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States, Clin Res Cardiol, 107, 287, 10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2 Kapur, 2013, Mechanically unloading the left ventricle before coronary reperfusion reduces left ventricular wall stress and myocardial infarct size, Circulation, 128, 328, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000029 Sun, 2016, Early Assistance With Left Ventricular Assist Device Limits Left Ventricular Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Swine Model, Artif Organs, 40, 243, 10.1111/aor.12541 Cohen, 2015, Why do we need observational studies of everyday patients in the real-life setting?, Eur Heart J Suppl, 17, D2, 10.1093/eurheartj/suv035 Seyfarth, 2008, A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction, J Am Coll Cardiol, 52, 1584, 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.065 Bochaton, 2019, Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella(R) LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study, Arch Cardiovasc Dis Ouweneel, 2017, Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction, J Am Coll Cardiol, 69, 278, 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.022 Ponikowski, 2016, Eur Heart J, 37, 2129, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128 Menon, 2000, Acute myocardial infarction complicated by systemic hypoperfusion without hypotension: report of the SHOCK trial registry, Am J Med, 108, 374, 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00310-7 Hochman, 1999, Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock, N Engl J Med, 341, 625, 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901 Esposito, 2017, Acute mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: the “door to support” time, F1000Res, 6, 737, 10.12688/f1000research.11150.1 Jentzer, 2019, Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, J Am Coll Cardiol, 74, 2117, 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077 Baran, 2019, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 94, 29, 10.1002/ccd.28329 Thiele, 2017, PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, N Engl J Med, 377, 2419, 10.1056/NEJMoa1710261 D’Arrigo, 2017, Predictors of favourable outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Resuscitation, 121, 62, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.005 Flaherty, 2017, Hemodynamic Support With a Microaxial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella) Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Circ Res, 120, 692, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309738 Thiele, 2017, Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials, Eur Heart J, 38, 3523, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx363 Burkhoff, 2013, Science and Evaluation of the Assisted Circulation with Percutaneous Assist Devices, Interv Cardiol Clin, 2, 407 Basir, 2017, Effect of early initiation of mechanical circulatory support on survival in cardiogenic shock, Am J Cardiol, 119, 845, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.037 Schrage, 2019, Impella support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, Circulation, 139, 1249, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614 Shahzad, 2014, Unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (HEAT-PPCI): an open-label, single centre, randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 384, 1849, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60924-7 Burkhoff, 2006, Am Heart J, 152, 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.05.031 Hall, 2018, Use of a percutaneous temporary circulatory support device as a bridge to decision during acute decompensation of advanced heart failure, J Heart Lung Transplant, 37, 100, 10.1016/j.healun.2017.09.020 Helleu, 2018, Current indications for the intra-aortic balloon pump: The CP-GARO registry, Arch Cardiovasc Dis, 111, 739, 10.1016/j.acvd.2018.03.011 Sandhu, 2015, Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, Circulation, 132, 1243, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014451 Na, 2016, Association between presence of a cardiac intensivist and mortality in an adult cardiac care unit, J Am Coll Cardiol, 68, 2637, 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.947 Shaefi, 2015, Effect of cardiogenic shock hospital volume on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock, J Am Heart Assoc, 4, e001462, 10.1161/JAHA.114.001462 Tehrani, 2019, Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock, J Am Coll Cardiol, 73, 1659, 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.084 Combes, 2018, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, N Engl J Med, 378, 1965, 10.1056/NEJMoa1800385 O’Neill, 2018, Analysis of outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with the Impella device, Am Heart J, 202, 33, 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.024 Vetrovec, 2018, The cVAD registry for percutaneous temporary hemodynamic support: A prospective registry of Impella mechanical circulatory support use in high-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock, and decompensated heart failure, Am Heart J, 199, 115, 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.09.007 Jensen, 2018, Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, 5.0 and RP in 109 consecutive patients with profound cardiogenic shock, Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 7, 53, 10.1177/2048872617743194 Basir, 2018, Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 91, 454, 10.1002/ccd.27427 Flaherty, 2017, Early Initiation of Impella in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Improves Survival: A Meta-Analysis, JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 10, 1805, 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.027 Bonello, 2018, Arch Cardiovasc Dis, 111, 601, 10.1016/j.acvd.2018.03.008 Subramaniam, 2019, Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature, Cardiol Ther, 8, 211, 10.1007/s40119-019-00152-8 Lauten, 2013, Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry, Circ Heart Fail, 6, 23, 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.967224