Trial quality checklists: on the need to multiply (not add) scores

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 17 - Trang 1789-1790 - 2013
Kaitlin E. Palys1, Vance W. Berger2, Sunny Alperson3
1Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA
2Biometry Research Group, National Cancer Institute, and UMBC, Bethesda, USA
3Montgomery College, Takoma Park, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Craane B, Dijkstra PU, Stappaerts K, De Laat A (2012) Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales. Clin Oral Investig 16(1):295–303 Chalmers TC, Smith H Jr, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D (1981) A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin Trials 2(1):31–49 Palys K, Berger VW (2012) A note on the Jadad score as an efficient tool for measuring trial quality, J Gastrointest Surg 17(6):1170-1. doi:10.1007/s11605-012-2106-0. Berger VW, Alperson SY (2009) A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality. Rev Recent Clin Trials 4(2):79–88 Berger VW (2006) Is the Jadad score the proper evaluation of trials? J Rheumatol 33(8):1710