Trends in species diversity and composition of urban vegetation over three decades

Journal of Vegetation Science - Tập 15 Số 6 - Trang 781-788 - 2004
Petr Pyšek1, Zdena Chocholoušková2,3, Antonín Pyšek1, Vojtĕch Jaros̆ı́k4, Milan Chytrý5,3,6, Lubomír Tichý5,3,6
1Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
2Department of Biology, Faculty of Education, University of West Bohemia, Klatovská 51, CZ-30619 Plzeň, Czech Republic
3e-mail: [email protected]
4Department of Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ‐12801 Praha 2, Czech Republic; E‐mail:; Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ‐25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic
5Department of Botany, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ-611 37 Brno, Czech Republic
6[email protected]

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Question: What was the change in diversity of urban synantropic vegetation in a medium‐sized Central European city during the period of increasing urbanization (1960s‐1990s)?

Location: The city of Plzeň, an industrial centre of the western part of the Czech Republic.

Methods: Sampling of various types of synanthropic vegetation, conducted in the 1960s, was repeated by using the same methods in the 1990s. This yielded 959 relevés, of which 623 were made in the 1960s and 336 in the 1990s. The relevés were assigned to the following phytosociological classes: Chenopodietea, Artemisietea vulgaris, Galio‐Urticetea, Agropyretea repentis and Plantaginetea majoris. Total number of vascular plant species, evenness index J, number of alien species (classified into archaeophytes and neophytes), and mean Ellenberg indicator values for light, temperature, continentality, moisture, soil reaction, and nutrients were obtained for each relevé.

Results: From 1960s to 1990s, there was a significant decrease of species richness and diversity in synanthropic vegetation. The proportion of archaeophytes decreased in most vegetation types, indicating the contribution of this group of species, often confined to specific rural‐like habitats, to the observed impoverishment of ruderal vegetation. The proportion of neophytes did not change between the two periods. Comparison between 1960s and 1990s indicated a decrease in light, temperature, moisture, soil reaction and nutrient indicator values in some vegetation types. In both periods, Artemisieta, Galio‐Urticetea and Chenopodietea formed a distinct group harbouring more species than Agropyretea and Plantaginetea. Neophytes, i.e. recently introduced species, were most represented in the early successional annual vegetation of Chenopodietea, rather than in perennial vegetation of the other classes.

Conclusions: Synanthropic vegetation of Plzeň exhibited a general trend of decrease in species diversity.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/2528486

Box G.E.P., 1982, An analysis of transformations revisited, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 77, 209, 10.1080/01621459.1982.10477788

Brandes D., 1981, Gefährdete Ruderalgesellschaften in Niedersachsen und Möglichkeiten zu ihrer Erhaltung, Gött. Flor. Rundbr., 14, 90

10.1078/0367-2530-00109

10.2307/3236858

Chytrý M., 2003, Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation‐plot data, Preslia, 75, 1

10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02025.x

Crawley M.J., 1993, GLIM for ecologists.

10.1098/rstb.1996.0108

Ehrendorfer F., 1973, Liste der Gefäβpflanzen Mitteleuropas.

Ellenberg H., 1991, Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa, Scr. Geobot., 18, 1

Fitter A., 1986, (ed.)Plant ecology, 375

Gilbert O.L., 1989, Ecology of urban environment.

Haeupler H., 1974, Statistische Auswertung von Punkt‐rasterkarten der Gefässpflanzenflora Süd‐Niedersachsens, Scr. Geobot., 8, 1

10.2307/3237010

Holub J., 2000, Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic — 2000, Preslia, 72, 187

Klotz S., 1987, Floristische und vegetationskundliche Untersuchungen in Städten der DDR, Düsseldorfer Geobot. Kolloq., 4, 61

Klotz S., 1990, Urban ecology, 99

Klotz S., 1992, Biologisch‐ökologische Daten zur Flora von Leipzig — ein Vergleich, Acta Acad. Sci., 1, 94

Kopecký K., 1980, Die Ruderalpflanzengesellschaften im südwestlichen Teil von Praha (1) — (6), Preslia, 52, 241

10.1007/BF01324770

Kowarik I., 1988, Zum menschlichen Einfluss auf Flora und Vegetation. Theoretische Konzepte und ein Quantifi‐zierungsansatz am Beispiel von Berlin (West), Land-schaftsentw. Umweltforsch., 56, 1

Kowarik I., 1995, Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems, 85

Kubát K., 2003, Persicaria pensylvanica in der Tschechischen Republik, Preslia, 75, 183

Kühn I., 2004, The flora of German cities is naturally species rich, Evol. Ecol. Res., 6, 749

Landolt E., 2000, Some results of a floristic inventory within the city of Zürich (1984–1988), Preslia, 72, 441

Lososová Z., 2003, Estimating past distribution of vanishing weed vegetation in South Moravia, Preslia, 75, 71

10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02279.x

10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0

McCune B., 1999, PC‐ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4.

10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1

10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250209.x

Moravec J., 1995, Rostlinná společenstva České republiky a jejich ohrožení (Red list of plant communities of the Czech Republic and their endangerment), 1

Nesvadbová J., 1997, Flóra a vegetace města Plzně [Flora and vegetation of the city of Plzeň].

10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.010

10.2307/3546109

Pyšek A., 1974, Kurzgefasste Übersicht der Ruderalvegetation von der Ruderalvegetation von Plzeň und seiner nahen Umgebung, Folia Mus. Rer. Natur. Bohem. Occid. Ser. Bot., 4, 1

Pyšek A., 1977, Sukzession der Ruderalpflanzengesellschaften von Gross‐Plzeň, Preslia, 49, 161

Pyšek A.1978.Ruderální vegetace Velké Plzně [Ruderal vegetation of the Plzeň agglomeration].Thesis Botanical Institute Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences Průhonice CZ .

Pyšek A., 1988, Ruderální flóra Plzně [Ruderal flora of Pilsen], Shorn. Západočes. Muz. Plzeň, Ser. Nat., 68, 1

10.1007/BF02912746

10.1007/BF00044860

10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.251177.x

Pyšek P., 1991, Succession in urban habitats: an analysis of phytosociological data, Preslia, 63, 125

10.2307/4135498

Pyšek P., 2002, Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic, Preslia, 74, 97

10.1038/151462a0

Sokal R., 1995, Biometry.

Sukopp H., 2002, On the early history of urban ecology in Europe, Preslia, 74, 373

10.1007/978-94-009-7269-8_19

Sýkora K.V., 2002, Phytosociological and floristic evaluation of a 15‐year ecological management of roadside verges in the Netherlands, Preslia, 74, 421

10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02069.x

Vesecký A., 1961, PodnebíČeskoslovenské socialistické republiky. Tabulky [Climate of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic. Tables].

10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5_9

Wiegleb G., 1986, Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der Daten‐analyse in der Pflanzensoziologie, Tuexenia, 6, 365

Wittig R., 2002, Siedlungsvegetation.