Transseptal versus transaortic approach for radiofrequency ablation in patients with cardioverter–defibrillator and electrical storm

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 28 - Trang 45-50 - 2010
Slawomir Pluta1, Radoslaw Lenarczyk1, Patrycja Pruszkowska-Skrzep1, Oskar Kowalski1, Adam Sokal1, Beata Sredniawa1, Michal Mazurek1, Zbigniew Kalarus1
11st Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center of Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland

Tóm tắt

Radiofrequency current ablation (RFCA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is usually performed using a retrograde transaortic approach. We compared the mapping accuracy, procedural course, safety, and results of VT ablation using transseptal and transaortic route. Twenty-one consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and history of electrical storm underwent RFCA with electro-anatomic mapping system. In six patients, ablation was performed with transseptal approach (transseptal group); in 15, retrograde approach to the left ventricle was used (retrograde group). The endocardial surface of the left ventricle was similarly accessible in both methods. Less detailed maps of interventricular septum were constructed with the use of transseptal approach. The RFCA success rate was similar in the transseptal and retrograde groups (83 vs. 80%, p = NS). The median procedural time was 112 min in transseptal vs. 145 min in the retrograde group; radiation exposure was 200 vs. 67 mGy, respectively (both p < 0.05), and fluoroscopy time was 22 vs.16 min (p = NS). During the 3-month follow-up, VT recurrence occurred in one patient in the transseptal group and in three patients in the retrograde group (p = NS). Transseptal approach is an accurate, safe, feasible, and effective method of RF ablation in patients with malignant, recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. However, limited access to the septal regions with the use of this method has to be remembered. Transseptal approach may be considered as an alternative to the transaortic route in patients with contraindication to the latter.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Credner, S. C., Klingenheben, T., Mauss, O., Sticherling, C., & Hohnloser, S. H. (1998). Electrical storm in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Incidence, management and prognostic implications. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 32(7), 1909–1915. Gatzoulis, K. A., Andrikopoulos, G. K., Apostolopoulos, T., Sotiropoulos, E., Zervopoulos, G., Antoniou, J., et al. (2005). Electrical storm is an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome in the era of implantable defibrillator therapy. Europace, 7, 184–192. Bilge, A. K., Ozben, B., Demircan, S., Cinar, M., Yilmaz, E., & Adalet, K. (2006). Depression and anxiety status of patients with implantable cardioverter–defibrillator and precipitating factors. PACE, 29, 619–626. Exner, D. V., Pinski, S. L., Wyse, D. G., Renfroe, E. G., Follmann, D., Gold, M., et al. (2001). Electrical storm presages nonsudden death: The antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial. Circulation, 103, 2066–2071. Zipes, D. P., Camm, A. J., Borggrefe, M., Buxton, A. E., Chaitman, B., Fromer, M., et al. (2006). ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death. Europace, 8, 746–837. Marchlinski, F. E., Callans, D. J., Gottlieb, C. D., & Zado, E. (2000). Linear ablation lesion for control of unmappable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation, 101, 1288–1296. Reddy, V. Y., Reynolds, M. R., Neuzil, P., Richardson, A. W., Taborsky, M., Jongnarangsin, K., et al. (2007). Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 2657–2665. Carbucicchio, C., Santamaria, M., Trevisi, N., Maccabelli, G., Giraldi, F., Fassini, G., et al. (2008). Catheter ablation for the treatment of electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter–defibrillators: Short- and long-term outcomes in a prospective single-center study. Circulation, 117, 462–469. Volkmer, M., Ouyang, F., Deger, F., Ernst, S., Goya, M., Bansch, D., et al. (2006). Substrate mapping vs.tachycardia mapping using CARTO in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia: Impact on outcome of catheter ablation. Europace, 8, 968–976. Yamada, T., McElderry, H. T., Doppalapudi, H., & Kay, G. N. (2008). Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia originating from underneath the mechanical prosthetic aortic valve. PACE, 31, 618–620. Arenal, A., Glez-Torrecilla, E., Ortiz, M., Villacastin, J., Fdez-Portales, J., Sousa, E., et al. (2003). Ablation of electrograms with an isolated, delayed component as treatment of unmappable monomorphic ventricular tachycardias in patients with structural heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 41, 81–92. Pratola, C., Baldo, E., Notarstefano, P., Tiziano, T., & Ferrari, R. (2006). Feasibility of the transseptal approach for fast and unstable ventricular mapping and ablation with a non-contact mapping system. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 16, 111–116.