Transrectal Ultrasound (US), Contrast-enhanced US, Real-time Elastography, HistoScanning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and MRI-US Fusion Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

European Urology Focus - Tập 1 - Trang 117-126 - 2015
Timur H. Kuru1, Jurgen J. Fütterer2, Jonas Schiffmann3, Daniel Porres1, Georg Salomon4, Ardeshir R. Rastinehad5
1Department of Urology, RWTH University Aachen, Germany
2Department of Radiology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
3Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
4Martini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
5Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, NY, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Schroder, 2014, Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up, Lancet, 384, 2, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0 Heidenreich, 2013, Early detection of prostate cancer: European Association of Urology recommendation, Eur Urol, 64, 347, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.051 Nevoux, 2011, Quantitative tissue analyses of prostate cancer foci in an unselected cystoprostatectomy series, BJU Int, 110, 517, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10776.x Mygatt, 2014, Anterior tumors of the prostate: clinicopathological features and outcomes, Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 17, 75, 10.1038/pcan.2013.54 Holm, 1981, Ultrasonically guided precise needle placement in the prostate and the seminal vesicles, J Urol, 125, 385, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55044-2 Astraldi, 1937, Diagnosis of cancer of the prostate: biopsy by rectal route, Urol Cutan Rev, 41, 421 Lee, 2009, Classification of focal prostatic lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and the accuracy of TRUS to diagnose prostate cancer, Korean J Radiol, 10, 244, 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.3.244 Tamsel, 2008, Transrectal ultrasound in detecting prostate cancer compared with serum total prostate-specific antigen levels, J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 52, 24, 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01906.x Brock, 2011, Comparison of real-time elastography with grey-scale ultrasonography for detection of organ-confined prostate cancer and extra capsular extension: a prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy, BJU Int, 108, E217, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10209.x Lee, 1991, Prostate cancer: transrectal ultrasound and pathology comparison. A preliminary study of outer gland (peripheral and central zones) and inner gland (transition zone) cancer, Cancer, 67, 1132, 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4+<1132::AID-CNCR2820671506>3.0.CO;2-K Taverna, 2011, Colour Doppler and microbubble contrast agent ultrasonography do not improve cancer detection rate in transrectal systematic prostate biopsy sampling, BJU Int, 108, 1723, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10199.x Mitterberger, 2010, Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection, Eur Radiol, 20, 2791, 10.1007/s00330-010-1860-1 Grabski, 2011, Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies, World J Urol, 29, 573, 10.1007/s00345-011-0713-0 Gramiak, 1968, Echocardiography of the aortic root, Invest Radiol, 3, 356, 10.1097/00004424-196809000-00011 Kim, 2011, Hepatocellular nodules in liver cirrhosis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Abdom Imaging, 36, 244, 10.1007/s00261-011-9686-0 Quaia, 2011, Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Eur Radiol, 21, 604, 10.1007/s00330-010-1965-6 Frauscher, 2001, Detection of prostate cancer with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent, Lancet, 357, 1849, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04970-9 Mitterberger, 2007, A prospective randomized trial comparing contrast-enhanced targeted versus systematic ultrasound guided biopsies: Impact on prostate cancer detection, Prostate, 67, 1537, 10.1002/pros.20639 Zhao, 2013, The value and limitations of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography for the detection of prostate cancer, Eur J Radiol, 82, e641, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.004 Cornelis, 2013, Real-time contrast-enhanced transrectal US-guided prostate biopsy: diagnostic accuracy in men with previously negative biopsy results and positive MR imaging findings, Radiology, 269, 159, 10.1148/radiol.13122393 Seitz, 2011, Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CE-TRUS) with cadence-contrast pulse sequence (CPS) technology for the identification of prostate cancer, Urol Oncol, 29, 295, 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.032 Jung, 2012, First results of endocavity evaluation of the microvascularization of malignant prostate tumors using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) including perfusion analysis: first results, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 52, 167, 10.3233/CH-2012-1594 Halpern, 2012, Contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind trial of dutasteride pretreatment, J Urol, 188, 1739, 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.021 Aigner, 2012, Value of enhanced transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a retrospective data analysis, World J Urol, 30, 341, 10.1007/s00345-011-0809-6 Zhao, 2011, The value of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound in predicting the nature of prostate diseases and the Gleason score of prostate cancer by a subjective blood flow grading scale, Urol Int, 87, 165, 10.1159/000327988 Salomon, 2014, Real-time elastography for the detection of prostate cancer, Curr Urol Rep, 15, 392, 10.1007/s11934-013-0392-z Ophir, 1991, Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues, Ultrason Imaging, 13, 111, 10.1177/016173469101300201 Salomon, 2014, Incremental detection rate of prostate cancer by real-time elastography targeted biopsies in combination with a conventional 10-core biopsy in 1024 consecutive patients, BJU Int, 113, 548, 10.1111/bju.12517 Aigner, 2010, Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25 ng/ml or greater and 4.00 ng/ml or less, J Urol, 184, 913, 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.026 Sumura, 2007, Initial evaluation of prostate cancer with real-time elastography based on step-section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study, Int J Urol, 14, 811, 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01829.x Aigner, 2011, Comparison of real-time sonoelastography with T2-weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection, J Ultrasound Med, 30, 643, 10.7863/jum.2011.30.5.643 Pelzer, 2013, Real-time sonoelastography compared to magnetic resonance imaging using four different modalities at 3.0 T in the detection of prostate cancer: strength and weaknesses, Eur J Radiol, 82, 814, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.035 Brock M, Roghmann F, Sonntag C, et al. Fusion of magnetic resonance imaging and real-time elastography to visualize prostate cancer: a prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy. Ultraschall Med. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1366563 Boehm, 2015, Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols, J Urol, 193, 794, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.100 Walz, 2011, Identification of the prostate cancer index lesion by real-time elastography: considerations for focal therapy of prostate cancer, World J Urol, 29, 589, 10.1007/s00345-011-0688-x Salomon, 2008, Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 54, 1354, 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.035 Pallwein, 2007, Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience, BJU Int, 100, 42, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06851.x Rausch, 2012, The utility of transrectal sonoelastography in preoperative prostate cancer assessment, Med Ultrason, 14, 182, 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.143.sr182 Tsutsumi, 2010, Real-time balloon inflation elastography for prostate cancer detection and initial evaluation of clinicopathologic analysis, Am J Roentgenol, 194, W471, 10.2214/AJR.09.3301 Brock, 2013, Multiparametric ultrasound of the prostate: adding contrast enhanced ultrasound to real-time elastography to detect histopathologically confirmed cancer, J Urol, 189, 93, 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.183 Braeckman, 2008, Computer-aided ultrasonography (HistoScanning): a novel technology for locating and characterizing prostate cancer, BJU Int, 101, 293, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07232.x Braeckman, 2008, The accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography supplemented with computer-aided ultrasonography for detecting small prostate cancers, BJU Int, 102, 1560, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07878.x Macek, 2014, Prostate histoscanning in clinically localized biopsy proven prostate cancer: an accuracy study, J Endourol, 28, 371, 10.1089/end.2013.0419 Simmons, 2011, Detection, localisation and characterisation of prostate cancer by prostate HistoScanning, BJU Int, 110, 28, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10734.x Schiffmann, 2014, Comparison of prostate cancer volume measured by HistoScanning and final histopathological results, World J Urol, 32, 939, 10.1007/s00345-013-1211-3 Núñez-Mora, 2013, Utility of HistoScanning prior to prostate biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma, Actas Urol Esp, 37, 342, 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.01.003 Javed, 2014, Does prostate HistoScanning play a role in detecting prostate cancer in routine clinical practice? Results from three independent studies, BJU Int, 114, 541, 10.1111/bju.12568 Schiffmann, 2014, Does HistoScanning™ predict positive results in prostate biopsy? A retrospective analysis of 1,188 sextants of the prostate, World J Urol, 32, 925, 10.1007/s00345-014-1330-5 Pinto, 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, J Urol, 186, 1281, 10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.078 Sciarra, 2011, Modern role of magnetic resonance and spectroscopy in the imaging of prostate cancer, Urol Oncol, 29, 12, 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.06.001 Puech, 2012, Detecting prostate cancer with MRI—why and how, Diagn Interv Imaging, 93, 268, 10.1016/j.diii.2012.01.019 Tamada, 2011, Prostate cancer detection in patients with total serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL: diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and T2-weighted imaging, Am J Roentgenol, 197, 664, 10.2214/AJR.10.5923 Hoeks, 2011, Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging, Radiology, 261, 46, 10.1148/radiol.11091822 Turkbey, 2010, Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric mr imaging at 3 t for detection—histopathologifc correlation 1, Radiology, 255, 89, 10.1148/radiol.09090475 Delongchamps, 2011, Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging, BJU Int, 107, 1411, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09808.x Delongchamps, 2011, Multiparametric MRI is helpful to predict tumor focality, stage, and size in patients diagnosed with unilateral low-risk prostate cancer, Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 14, 232, 10.1038/pcan.2011.9 Scheenen, 2011, Discriminating cancer from noncancer tissue in the prostate by 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging: a prospective multicenter validation study, Invest Radiol, 46, 25, 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181f54081 White, 1995, Prostate cancer: effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images, Radiology, 195, 385, 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724756 Hricak, 1983, Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging, Am J Roentgenol, 141, 1101, 10.2214/ajr.141.6.1101 Stejskal, 1965, Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient, J Chem Phys, 42 Kim, 2007, Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results, Invest Radiol, 42, 842, 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181461d21 Tamada, 2008, Age-related and zonal anatomical changes of apparent diffusion coefficient values in normal human prostatic tissues, J Magn Reson Imaging, 27, 552, 10.1002/jmri.21117 Alonzi, 2007, Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in prostate cancer, Eur J Radiol, 63, 335, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.028 Barentsz, 1999, Fast dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of urinary bladder and prostate cancer, J Magn Reson Imaging, 10, 295, 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<295::AID-JMRI10>3.0.CO;2-Z American College of Radiology. PI-RADS v2. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.0; 2014. http://www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/PIRADS/PIRADS%20V2 Le, 2015, Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology, Eur Urol, 67, 569, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.079 Radtke, 2015, Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance, J Urol, 193, 87, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.098 Puech, 2013, Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy—prospective multicenter study, Radiology, 268, 461, 10.1148/radiol.13121501 Baco, 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients, Eur Urol, 67, 787, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.077 Da Rosa, 2015, A prospective comparison of MRI-US fused targeted biopsy versus systematic ultrasound-guided biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients on active surveillance, J Magn Reson Imaging, 41, 220, 10.1002/jmri.24710 Le, 2014, MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology, J Urol, 192, 1367, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.094 Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, et al. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.026 Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Bangma CH, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MGM. Magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.037 Kuru, 2013, Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer, J Urol, 190, 1380, 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.043 Rais-Bahrami, 2014, Natural history of small index lesions suspicious for prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI: recommendations for interval imaging follow-up, Diagn Interv Radiol, 20, 293, 10.5152/dir.2014.13319 Dickinson, 2013, Image-directed, tissue-preserving focal therapy of prostate cancer: a feasibility study of a novel deformable magnetic resonance-ultrasound (MR-US) registration system, BJU Int, 112, 594, 10.1111/bju.12223 Thompson, 2014, Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study, J Urol, 192, 67, 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.014 Isebaert, 2012, Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer localization in correlation to whole-mount histopathology, J Magn Reson Imaging, 37, 1392, 10.1002/jmri.23938 Arumainayagam, 2013, Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard, Radiology, 268, 761, 10.1148/radiol.13120641 Haffner, 2011, Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection, BJU Int, 108, E171, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10112.x