Transitional Justice and ‘National Ownership’: An Assessment of the Institutional Development of the War Crimes Chamber of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Tóm tắt
In anticipation of its closure in 2014, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia has begun to set out proposals for preserving and promoting its legacy of prosecuting persons responsible for violations of humanitarian law during the conflicts of the 1990s. A key aspect of this legacy has been to support the ‘national ownership’ of the justice systems in the former Yugoslavia that will continue to try war crimes cases in the years to come. This study explores the institutional development of the War Crimes Chamber of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (WCC) to national ownership. In particular, it considers three critical aspects of the WCC's functioning that highlight the challenges that it faces as a mechanism of transitional justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). These are the composition of prosecutors and judges, prosecutorial practices and outreach and communication activities. The article shows that the continued difficulties with these areas of legal practice figure as significant obstacles to the WCC's transition to full national ownership by both the legal professionals and local populace of BiH.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abdulhak T (2009) Building sustainable capacities—from an international tribunal to a domestic war crimes chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina. Int Crim Law Rev 9:333–358
Artz D (2006) Views on the ground: the local perception of International Criminal Tribunals in the Former Yugoslavia and Sierra Leone. Ann American Academy Polit Soc Sci 603(1):226–239
Barria L, Roper S (2008) Judicial capacity building in Bosnia and Herzegovina: understanding legal reform beyond the completion strategy of the ICTY. Hum Rights Rev 9:317–330
BIRN (2010) War crimes strategy misses one deadline after another. Justice Report, 8 January 2010. http://www.bim.ba/en/200/10/24864/. Accessed 29 August 2011
BIRN (2011a) Bosnia state prosecutor ‘slowing’ work on war crimes. Justice Report, 13 May 2011. http://www.bim.ba/en/269/10/32429/. Accessed 10 September 2011
BIRN (2011b) Trials have not helped reconciliation, survey shows. Justice Report, 11 April 2011. http://www.bim.ba/en/264/10/32161/. Accessed 29 August 2011
BIRN (2011c) International community “must block” referendum on court. Justice Report, 15 April 2011. http://www.bim.ba/en/265/10/32194/. Accessed 29 August 2011
Biro M et al (2004) Attitudes toward justice and social reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. In: Stover E, Weinstein H (eds) My neighbor, my enemy: justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 183–206
Bohlander M (2003) Last exit Bosnia—transferring war crimes prosecution from the International Tribunal to domestic courts. Crim Law Forum 14: 59–99
Burke-White W (2007) The domestic influence of international criminal tribunals: the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the creation of the State Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Scholarship at Penn Law. Paper 185
Clark J (2009) International war crimes tribunals and the challenge of outreach. Int Crim Law Rev 9:99–116
Clark J (2010) The State Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina: a path to reconciliation? Contemp Justice Rev 13(4):371–390
Cryer R et al. (2007) An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Fletcher L, Weinstein H, Rowen J (2009) Context, timing and the dynamics of transitional justice: a historical perspective. Hum Rights Quart 31:163–220
Garbett C (2010) Localising criminal justice: an overview of national prosecutions at the war crimes chamber of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Hum Rights Law Rev 10(3):558–568
Garbett C (2011) Completed cases heard by the war crimes chamber of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina: case analysis database. http://www.bosnianbonesspanishghosts.org/. Accessed 10 September 2011
Gready P (2005) Reconceptualising transitional justice: embedded and distanced justice. Conflict Secur Development 5(1):3–21
Hansen A et al (2007) The transition to a just order—establishing local ownership after conflict: a practitioner's guide. Folke Bernadotte Academy Publications
Hodžić R (2007) Bosnia and Herzegovina—legitimacy in transition. http://www.peace-justice-conference.info/download/Hodzic_Expert%20Paper.pdf. Accessed 28 August 2011
Hodžić R (2010) Living the legacy of mass atrocities: victims’ perspectives on war crimes trials. J Int Crim Justice 8(1):113–136
Human Rights Watch (2006) Looking for justice: the war crimes chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Vol. 18, No. 1(D).
Human Rights Watch (2007) Narrowing the impunity gap: trials before Bosnia's war crimes chamber. Vol. 19, No. 1(D)
Ivanišević B (2008) The war crimes chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina: from hybrid to domestic court. New York, International Center for Transitional Justice
Kermani Mendez P (2009) The new wave of hybrid tribunals: a sophisticated approach to enforcing international humanitarian law or an idealistic solution with empty promises? Crim Law Forum 20(1):53–96
Lauth M (2005) Ten years after Dayton: War crimes prosecutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Hels Monit 16(4):253–266
Lundy P, McGovern M (2008) Whose justice? Rethinking transitional justice from the bottom up. J Law Soc 35(2):265–292
Lutz E (2006) Transitional justice: lessons learned and the road ahead. In: Roht-Arriaza N, Mariezcurrena J (eds) Transitional justice in the twenty-first century: Beyond truth versus justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 325–341
Mani R (2002) Beyond retribution: seeking justice in the shadows of war. Polity Press
Megwalu A, Loizides N (2010) Dilemmas of justice and reconciliation: Rwandans and the Gacaca courts. Afr J Int Comp Law 18(1):1–23
OSCE (2005) War crimes before the domestic courts of Bosnia and Herzegovina: progress and obstacles. OSCE, Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
OSCE (2010a) The processing of ICTY Rule 11bis cases in Bosnia and Herzegovina: reflections on findings from five years of OSCE monitoring. Sarajevo, OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
OSCE (2010b) Witness protection and support in BiH domestic war crimes trials: obstacles and recommendations a year after the adoption of the national strategy for war crimes processing. Sarajevo, OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
OSCE (2011) Delivering justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina: an overview of war crimes processing from 2005 to 2010. Sarajevo, OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ramirez-Barat C (2011) Making an impact: guidelines on designing and implementing outreach programs for transitional justice. New York, International Center for Transitional Justice
Registry (2009) Annual Report 2009. http://www.registrarbih.gov.ba/index.php?opcija=sadrzaji&id=19&jezik=e. Accessed 10 September 2011
Robinson P (2010a) Message from the president. http://www.icty.org/sid/142. Accessed 10 September 2011
Robinson P (2010b) Report of the president on the conference: assessing the legacy of the ICTY. http://www.icty.org/sid/10293. Accessed 10 September 2011
Robinson, P (2011) Creating a legacy that supports sustainable rule of law in the region. In: Steinberg, R (ed) Assessing the legacy of the ICTY, Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp 21–26
Roht-Arriaza N (2006) The new landscape of transitional justice. In: Roht-Arriaza N, Mariezcurrena J (eds) Transitional justice in the twenty-first century: beyond truth versus justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 1–16
Schwendiman D (2010) Prosecuting atrocity crimes in national courts: looking back on 2009 in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Northwest J Int Hum Rights 8(3):269–300
Stover E (2005) The witnesses: war crimes and the promise of justice in The Hague. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press
UNDP (2005) Justice and truth in BiH: public perceptions—early warning system special edition. Sarajevo, UNDP
UNDP (2009) Early warning system 2009. Sarajevo, UNDP