Transformative Environmental Governance

Annual Review of Environment and Resources - Tập 41 Số 1 - Trang 399-423 - 2016
Brian C. Chaffin1, Ahjond S. Garmestani2, Lance Gunderson3, Melinda Harm Benson4, David G. Angeler5, Craig Anthony Arnold6, Barbara Cosens7, Robin Kundis Craig8, J. B. Ruhl9, Craig R. Allen10
1College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59801;
2National Risk Management Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268;
3Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322;
4Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131;
5Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
6Brandeis School of Law and Department of Urban and Public Affairs, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40208;
7College of Law, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844;
8S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112;
9Vanderbilt Law School, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203;
10US Geological Survey, Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583;

Tóm tắt

Transformative governance is an approach to environmental governance that has the capacity to respond to, manage, and trigger regime shifts in coupled social-ecological systems (SESs) at multiple scales. The goal of transformative governance is to actively shift degraded SESs to alternative, more desirable, or more functional regimes by altering the structures and processes that define the system. Transformative governance is rooted in ecological theories to explain cross-scale dynamics in complex systems, as well as social theories of change, innovation, and technological transformation. Similar to adaptive governance, transformative governance involves a broad set of governance components, but requires additional capacity to foster new social-ecological regimes including increased risk tolerance, significant systemic investment, and restructured economies and power relations. Transformative governance has the potential to actively respond to regime shifts triggered by climate change, and thus future research should focus on identifying system drivers and leading indicators associated with social-ecological thresholds.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/415023a

10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2

10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x

10.1038/nature11018

10.1146/annurev-environ-102511-084654

Gunderson LH, 2002, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems

10.1073/pnas.1406493112

10.1038/461472a

10.1126/science.1259855

10.5751/ES-00650-090205

Holling CS, 1978, Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management

10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

Clark WC, 1986, Sustainable Development of the Biosphere

Walters CJ., 1986, Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources

Walker B, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World

16. United Nations (UN). 2012. UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda: governance and development thematic think piece. UN Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff., UN Dev. Progr., UN Educ. Sci. Cult. Org. Rep., May.http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/Think%20Pieces/7_governance.pdf

10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621

18. Rogers P, Hall A. 2003. Effective water governance. Backgr. Pap. 7, Tech. Comm., Glob. Water Partnersh., Stockh., Swed.http://www.gwp.org/Global/ToolBox/Publications/Background%20papers/07%20Effective%20Water%20Governance%20%282003%29%20English.pdf

10.1017/CBO9780511627170

10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

10.1126/science.1172133

10.5751/ES-01465-100209

23. Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R. 2008. Adaptive comanagement and the paradox of learning. Glob. Environ. Change 18: 86–98

10.5751/ES-05383-180121

25. Ansell C, Gash A. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18: 543–71

26. Bingham LB. 2010. Next generation of administrative law: building the legal infrastructure for collaborative governance. Wis. Law Rev. 297–356

10.1080/08941920802178214

10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.005

10.1126/science.1091015

10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

Brunner RD, 2005, Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy, and Decision Making

10.1007/s11077-006-9027-2

10.5751/ES-06824-190356

Cosens BA, 2014, Ida. Law Rev. Nat. Resour. Environ. Law Ed., 51, 1

10.5751/ES-02029-120123

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711

10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.022

10.2307/2937159

10.1017/S0376892902000322

Gunderson LH, 1995, Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions

Craig RK., 2010, Harv. Environ. Law Rev., 34, 9

10.1126/science.1151915

10.1007/s10021-013-9744-2

10.1371/journal.pone.0146053

10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.003

10.1080/08941921003652940

10.1177/0309132511425708

10.1126/sciadv.1400217

Berkes F, 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience

10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836

10.5751/ES-01595-110118

52. Holling CS. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. See Ref. 13, pp. 292–317

10.1073/pnas.0706905105

10.5822/978-1-61091-231-0

10.5751/ES-03610-150420

10.1177/0309132511425767

10.5751/ES-05072-180327

10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034022

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.003

10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9

10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00025-5

10.5751/ES-05180-180109

10.5751/ES-00089-030107

10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.012

10.5751/ES-05093-180103

10.5751/ES-02827-140126

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.009

10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8

Craig RK, 2014, Vanderbilt Law Rev., 67, 1

10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.063

Clark WC., 2001, Ecol. Law Q., 27, 1021

10.5751/ES-03218-150111

Loorbach D., 2007, Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development

10.1108/14636680110803003

10.1016/j.futures.2005.02.010

Bijker WE., 1997, Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Socio-technical Change

10.1504/IJSD.1999.004324

78. Loorbach D. 2014. To transition! Governance panarchy in the new transformation. Presented to Faculty Soc. Sci. on behalf of Vereniging Trustfonds, EUR, Oct. 31.http://www.drift.eur.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/To_Transition-Loorbach-2014.pdf

10.5751/ES-06799-190401

10.1126/science.1059386

Schellnhuber HJ, 2011, World in Transition: A Social Contract for Sustainability

Weinstein MP, 2013, Sustain.: Sci. Pract. Policy, 9, 4

10.1080/15239080701622873

10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005

Loorbach D., 2010, Government, 23, 161

10.5751/ES-02857-140203

10.1177/1368431009349830

10.1177/0309132513498837

10.3763/cpol.2007.0434

10.5751/ES-04038-160211

10.1007/978-3-642-17776-7_29

10.1177/0956247814550780

10.1017/CBO9780511894985.012

10.1007/s10098-013-0682-7

10.5751/ES-07489-200230

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.007

10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.013

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.001

10.5751/ES-03812-160105

Gunderson LH, 2014, Ida. Law Rev. Nat. Resour. Environ. Law Ed., 51, 127

10.1890/140294

Limerick PN, 2012, A Ditch in Time: The City, the West, and Water

10.1017/CBO9781139519762.015

10.5751/ES-06414-190233

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.006

10.1146/annurev-environ-121112-094434

Doremus H, 2008, Water War in the Klamath Basin: Macho Law, Combat Biology, and Dirty Politics

Gosnell H, 2010, Water Altern., 3, 361

Chaffin BC, 2014, Ida. Law Rev. Nat. Resour. Environ. Law Ed., 51, 157

10.1016/j.jebo.2010.12.015

112. Hartley D. 2013. Urban decline in rust-belt cities. Econ. Comment. 2013–06, Fed. Reserve Bank Clevel., May 20

10.1007/s11252-015-0476-2

10.1007/s10098-014-0886-5

10.5751/ES-06931-190406

10.7312/garm16058

10.1007/s13280-014-0505-z

10.1007/s13280-014-0510-2

Arnold CA, 2014, Ida. Law Rev. Nat. Resour. Environ. Law Ed., 51, 157

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.012

10.7551/mitpress/8953.001.0001