Chuyển giao và thay đổi khái niệm: quá trình thay đổi từ các quan điểm lý thuyết về lớp điều phối và các nguyên lý hiện tượng học

Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 61–101). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association. Brown, D. E. (1993). Refocusing core intuitions: A concretizing role for analogy in conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1273–1290. Brown, D. E. (1994). Facilitating conceptual change using analogies and explanatory models. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 201–214. Brown, J. R. (2006). The promise and perils of thought experiments. Interchange, 37, 1–2. Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding “anchoring conceptions” for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 554–565. diSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. diSessa, A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225. diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why “conceptual ecology” is a good idea. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 29–60). Dordrecht: Kluwer. diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1155–1191. diSessa, A. A., & Wagner, J. F. (2005). What coordination has to say about transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multi-disciplinary perspective (pp. 121–154). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Duit, R. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. Etkina, E., Mestre, J., & O’Donnell, A. (2005). The impact of the cognitive revolution on science learning and teaching. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), The cognitive revolution in educational psychology (pp. 119–164). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Gendler, T. S. (1998). Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiments. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49, 397–424. Hammer, D. (2004). The variability of student reasoning. Lecture 3. Manifold cognitive resources. In E. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI (pp. 320–340). Bologna: Italian Physical Society. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 89–119). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Hatano, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1999). Alternative perspectives on transfer and transfer studies. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 645–654. Hewitt, P. (2005). Conceptual Physics (9th Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pearson, Addison Wesley. Levrini, O., & diSessa, A. (2008). How students learn from multiple contexts and definitions: Proper time as a coordination class. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 4(1), 010107-1–18. Linder, C. (1993). A challenge to conceptual change. Science Education, 77(3), 293–300. Mestre, J. (2005). Is transfer ubiquitous or rare: new paradigms for studying transfer. In J. Marx, P. Heron & S. Franklin (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2004 Physics Education Research Conference (pp. 3–6). Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics. Mortimer, E. F. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science & Education, 4, 267–285. Nersessian, N. (1992). Constructing and instructing: the role of ‘abstraction techniques’ in creating and learning physics. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology and Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 48–68). New York: State University of New York Press. Nersessian, N. J. (1993). In the theoretician’s laboratory: Thought experiments as Mental modeling. In D. Hull, M. Forbes & K. Okruhlik (Eds.), PSA: Proceedings of the 1992 Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, (Vol. 2). East Lansing, MI: PSA. Norton, J. D. (2004). On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument? Philosophy of Science, 71, 1139–1151. Parnafes, O. (2007). What does “fast” mean? Understanding the physical world through computational representations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 415–450. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education (4th ed.). Keil, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Keil. Sorensen, R. (1992). Thought experiments. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 9, 374–382. Vosniadou, S. (2007). The cognitive-situative divide and the problem of conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 55–66. Wagner, J. F. (2006). Transfer in pieces. Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 1–71. Wittmann, M. C. (2002). The object coordination class applied to wave pulses: Analyzing student reasoning in wave physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 991–1013.