Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change
Tóm tắt
The transdisciplinary research mode has gained prominence in the research on and for sustainability transformations. Yet, solution-oriented research addressing complex sustainability problems has become complex itself, with new transdisciplinary research formats being developed and tested for this purpose. Application of new formats offers learning potentials from experience. To this end, we accompanied fourteen research projects conceptualized as real-world labs (RwLs) from 2015 to 2018. RwLs were part of a funding program on ‘Science for Sustainability’ in the German federal state of Baden-Württemberg. Here, we combine conceptual and empirical work to a structured collection of experiences and provide a comprehensive account of RwLs. First, we outline characteristics of RwLs as transformation oriented, transdisciplinary research approach, using experiments, enabling learning and having a long-term orientation. Second, we outline eleven success factors and concrete design notes we gained through a survey of the 14 RwLs: (1) find the right balance between scientific and societal aims, (2) address the practitioners needs and restrictions, (3) make use of the experimentation concept, (4) actively communicate, (5) develop a ‘collaboration culture’, (6) be attached to concrete sites, (7) create lasting impact and transferability, (8) plan for sufficient time and financial means, (9) adaptability, (10) research-based learning, and (11) recognize dependency on external actors. Characteristics and success factors are combined to illustrate practical challenges in RwLs. Third, we show which methods could be used to cope with challenges in RwLs. We conclude discussing the state of debate on RwLs and outline future avenues of research.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baden-Württemberg M für WF und K (2013) Ausschreibung 2: „Reallabore, BaWü-Labs, für eine Forschung für Nachhaltigkeit in Baden-Württemberg“. Stuttgart. Website not available anymore, document available as pdf with authors
Baden-Württemberg (2015) Wissenschaft für Nachhaltigkeit - Ausschreibung „Reallabor Stadt“. Stuttgart. Available at https://mwk.baden-wuerttemberg.de/fileadmin/redaktion/m-mvi/offen/Ausschreibung_ReallaborStadt.pdf (13 July 2020)
Banson KE, Nguyen NC, Bosch OJH (2018) A systems thinking approach to the structure, conduct and performance of the agricultural sector in Ghana. Syst Res Behav Sci 35:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2437
Barth M, Michelsen G (2013) Learning for change: an educational contribution to sustainability science. Sustain Sci 8:103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0181-5
Beecroft R, Trenks H, Rhodius R et al (2018) Reallabore als Rahmen transformativer und transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien. In: Defila R, Di Giulio A (eds) Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen Eine Methodensammlung. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 75–100
Bergmann M, Brohmann B, Hoffmann E, et al (2005) Quality Criteria of Transdisciplinary Research. A Guide for the Formative Evaluation of Research Projects. Inst fuer sozial-oekologische Forsch 5–75
Bergmann M, Jahn T, Knobloch T et al (2012) Methods for transdisciplinary research: a primer for practice. Campus Verlag
BMWi (2019) Freiräume für Innovationen. Das Reallabor Handbuch
Caniglia G, Schäpke N, Lang DJ et al (2017) Experiments and evidence in sustainability science : a typology. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.164
Charli-Joseph L, Siqueiros-Garcia JM, Eakin H et al (2018) Promoting agency for social-ecological transformation: a transformation-lab in the Xochimilco social-ecological system. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10214-230246
Cornell S, Berkhout F, Tuinstra W et al (2013) Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environ Sci Policy 28:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008
Defila R, Di Giulio A (2018a) Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen Eine Methodensammlung. Springer, Wiesbaden
Defila R, Di Giulio A (2018b) What is it good for? Reflecting and systematizing accompanying research to research programs. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 27:97–104. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.17
Defila R, Di Giulio A (2019) Transdisziplinär und Transformativ Forschen. Eine Methodensammlung, vol 2. Springer, Wiesbaden
Fazey I, Schäpke N, Caniglia G et al (2018) Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research. Energy Res Soc Sci 40:54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.026
Gerhard U, Marquardt E (2017) Reallabore als innovatives Forschungsformat zur Unter - suchung nachhaltiger Stadtentwicklung – eine kritische Reflexion. Berichte Geogr und Landeskd 91:97–111
Gross M, Hoffmann-Riem H, Krohn W (2005) Realexperimente: Ökologische Gestaltungsprozesse in der Wissensgesellschaft. transcript Verlag, Bielefeld
Heiskanen E, Laakso S, Matschoss K et al (2018) Designing real-world laboratories for the reduction of residential use: articulating theories of change. GAIA - Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 27:60–67
Hölscher K, Wittmayer JM, Loorbach D (2018) Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? Environ Innov Soc Transitions 27:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007
Jaeger-Erben M, Nagy E, Schäfer M et al (2018) Von der Programmatik zur Praxis: Plädoyer für eine Grounded Theory transformationsorientierter Forschung. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 27:117–121. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.1.5
Jahn T, Keil F (2016) Connecting real-world laboratories with transdisciplinary research | Reallabore im kontext transdisziplinärer forschung. GAIA 25:247–252. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.6
Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10
Kemmis S, McTaggart R, Nixon R (2014) The action research planner—doing critical participatory action research. Springer Singapure, Singapure
Klein JT (2004) Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures 36:515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007
Köhler J, Geels FW, Kern F et al (2019) An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions. Environ Innov Soc Trans 31:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M et al (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Liedtke C, Baedeker C, Hasselkuß M et al (2015) User-integrated innovation in sustainable LivingLabs: an experimental infrastructure for researching and developing sustainable product service systems. J Clean Prod 97:106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.070
Loorbach D (2007) Transition management. New mode of governance for sustainable development
Loorbach D, Frantzeskaki N, Avelino F (2017) Sustainability transitions research : transforming science and practice for societal change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 42:599–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
Luederitz C, Schäpke N, Wiek A et al (2017) Learning through evaluation—a tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005
Lux A, Schäfer M, Bergmann M et al (2019) Societal effects of transdisciplinary sustainability research—How can they be strengthened during the research process? Environ Sci Policy 101:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.012
McCrory G, Schäpke N, Holmén J, Holmberg J (2020) Exploring sustainability-oriented labs in real-world contexts: a review. J Clean Prod 2:2
Mukute M, Mudokwani K, McAllister G, Nyikahadzoi K (2018) Exploring the potential of developmental work research and change laboratory to support sustainability transformations: a case study of organic agriculture in zimbabwe. Mind Cult Act 25:229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2018.1451542
Nevens F, Frantzeskaki N, Gorissen L, Loorbach D (2013) Urban transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. J Clean Prod 50:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
Newig J, Lang DJ, Jahn S et al (2019) Linking modes of research to their scientific and societal outcomes. evidence from 81 sustainability-oriented research projects. Environ Sci Policy 101:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.008
Olsson P, Folke C (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
Overdevest C, Bleicher A, Gross M (2010) The experimental turn in environmental sociology: pragmatism and new forms of governance. In: Gross M, Heinrichs H (eds) Environmental sociology. Springer, Netherlands, pp 279–294
Parodi O (2019) Wider eine Engführung des Reallabor-Konzepts. Ökologisches Wirtschaften 2:8–9. https://doi.org/10.14512/OEW340208
Parodi O, Beecroft R, Albiez M et al (2016) Von „ Aktionsforschung “ bis „ Zielkonflikte “. TATuP Zeitschrift für Tech Theor und Prax 25:9–18
Parodi O, Ley A, Fokdal J, Seebacher A (2018a) Empfehlungen für die Förderung und Weiter—entwicklung von Reallaboren. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 27:178–179. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.1.15
Parodi O, Waitz C, Bachinger M et al (2018b) Insights into and recommendations from three real-world laboratories—an experience-based comparison. GAIA - Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 27:52–59
Pereira L, Frantzeskaki N, Hebinck A et al (2020) Transformative spaces in the making: key lessons from nine cases in the Global South. Sustain Sci 15:161–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00749-x
Puttrowait E, Dietz R, Gantert M, Heynold J (2018) Der Weg zum Realexperiment – Schlüsselakteure identifizieren, Kooperationsstrukturen aufbauen, Projektideen auswählen. In: Di Giulio A, Defila R (eds) Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 195–232
Reed MS, Evely AC, Cundill G et al (2010) What is social learning? Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01
Rhodius R, Pregernig M (2018) Per „Wissensmesse“ zum Forschungsprogramm – Arbeitsphasen und Abstimmungsprozesse zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. In: Di Giulio A, Defila R (eds) Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 163–194
Rogga S, Zscheischler J (2018) How much of the real-world laboratory is hidden in current transdisciplinary research ? GAIA - Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 27:18–22
Schäpke N, Stelzer F, Marg O et al (2017) Urban BaWü-labs: challenges and solutions when expanding the real-world lab infrastructure. GAIA. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.4.19
Schäpke N, Stelzer F, Caniglia G et al (2018) Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them. GAIA. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16
Schneidewind U, Singer-Brodowski M (2013) Transformative Wissenschaft: Klimawandel im deutschen Wissenschafts-und Hochschulsystem. Metropolis Verlag
Singer-Brodowski M, Beecroft R, Parodi O (2018) Real-world laboratories as educational settings—a systematic impulse for discussion. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc this issue:
Stauffacher M, Krütli P, Flüeler T, Scholz RW (2012) Learning from the transdisciplinary case study approach: a functional-dynamic approach to collaboration among diverse actors in applied energy settings. pp 227–245
Ukowitz M (2017) Transdisziplinäre Forschung in Reallaboren - Ein Plädoyer für Einheit in der Vielfalt. Gaia 26:9–12
United Nations General Assembly (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York
von Wirth T, Fuenfschilling L, Frantzeskaki N, Coenen L (2019) Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. Eur Plan Stud 27:229–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
Voss J-P, Bournemann B (2011) The politics of reflexive goverance: challenges for designing adaptive management and trasition management. Ecol Soc 16:1–27
Voytenko Y, McCormick K, Evans J, Schliwa G (2016) Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod 123:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
Wagner F, Grunwald A (2019) Reallabore zwischen Beliebtheit und Beliebigkeit Eine Bestandsaufnahme des transformativen Formats. Gaia 28:260–264. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.3.5
Wagner F, Schäpke N, Stelzer F et al (2016) BaWü-labs on their way: progress of real-world laboratories in Baden-Württemberg. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 25:220–221. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.21
Wanner M, Hilger A, Westerkowski J et al (2018) Towards a cyclical concept of real-world laboratories: a transdisciplinary research practice for sustainability transitions. DISP. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1487651
WBGU (2011) A social contract for sustainability. Berlin
WBGU (2016) Humanity on the move: unlocking the transformative power of cities. Springer, Berlin
Weingart P (2003) Wissenschaftssoziologie. transcript, Bielefeld
Weith T, Rogga S, Zscheischler J, Gaasch N (2019) Beyond projects: benefits of research accompanying research: reflections from the research programme Sustainable Land Management. Gaia 28:294–304. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.3.10
Wiek A, Lang DJ (2016) Transformational sustainability research methodology. In: Heinrichs H (ed) Sustainability science. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–41
Zimpelmann B (2018) Reallabore: Nuklei einer Wissenschaft für Nachhaltigkeit ? GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 27:321–322
Zscheischler J, Rogga S, Lange A (2018) The success of transdisciplinary research for sustainable land use: individual perceptions and assessments. Sustain Sci 13:1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0556-3