Transcultural issues in gender selection

International Congress Series - Tập 1266 - Trang 21-31 - 2004
G.I Serour1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the International Islamic Center for Population Studies and Research, Al-Azhar University, 40 Talaat Harb Street, City Center, Cairo 00202, Egypt

Tài liệu tham khảo

Serour, 2002, Family and sex selection, 97 Schenker, 2002, Gender selection: cultural and religious perspectives, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19, 400, 10.1023/A:1016807605886 Holy Quran, Sura Al-Takwir 8–9. Chan, 2002, Gender selection in China, its meanings and implications, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19, 426, 10.1023/A:1016815807703 Bhargava, 2003, Ethical issues in modern biological technologies, Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 7, 276, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61865-2 Malpani, 2002, Preimplantation sex selection for family balancing in India, Human Reproduction, 17, 11, 10.1093/humrep/17.1.11 Registrar General of India, Provisional Population totals, Census of India 2001 (New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General India, 2001. Available at http://www.censusindia.net/resultsmain). Yi, 1993, Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China, Population and Development Review, 19, 282, 10.2307/2938438 Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, Proceed with care: final report of the Royal Commission (Ottawa: Minister of Government Services Canada, 1993, 889). J.A. Millot, m'art de procréer les sexes à volonté, 4 edn., Vers. 1820. 1971, Stoolkowski et Emmeriche: Influence de la nutrition minerale de la vache sur la repartition des sexes dans la descendance, Annales d'Endocrinologie, 32, 3 Cohen, 2002, Gender selection: is there a European view?, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19, 417, 10.1023/A:1016811706795 Mori, 2002, Ethical considerations on Indications for gender selection in Japan, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19, 420, 10.1023/A:1016863723633 Serour, 2000, Reproductive choice: a Muslim perspective, 191 Dworkin, 1993, 148 Harris, 2000, Rights and reproductive choice, 5 Dickens, 2002, Can sex selection be ethically tolerated? Editorial, Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 335, 10.1136/jme.28.6.335 The proposed Assisted Human Reproduction Act, section (5) (1) (e). USC 42 §§ 263a-2 (i) (1), 2003 and USC 42 §§ 263a-2 (i) (2), 2003. Wolf, 2003, An opinion on regulating the assisted reproductive technologies, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 20, 290, 10.1023/A:1024566605878 The Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994. Indian Parliament Act No. 57 of 1994. Takeshita, 2003, Regulating assisted reproductive technologies in Japan, Journal of Assisted Reproductive and Genetics, 20, 260, 10.1023/A:1024554303152 Executive Board of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000, Guidelines on preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi, 52 Boada, 2003, Spanish regulations on assisted reproduction techniques, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 20, 271, 10.1023/A:1024558404061 Montagut, 2003, How to legislate in human reproduction: the French experience, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 20, 287, 10.1023/A:1024514621808 Ng, 2003, Regulating reproductive technology in Hong Kong, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 20, 281, 10.1023/A:1024562504969 Cadieux, 2003, Sex preselection and full disclosure, Fertility and Sterility, 8, 469, 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00670-8 Gleicher, 2002, Gender selection for non medical indications, Fertility and Sterility, 78, 460, 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03276-4 1983, 56 Simpson, 1999, The reproductive option of sex selection, Human Reproduction, 14, 870, 10.1093/humrep/14.4.870 Sen, 1990, 61 1996, 336 Pennings, 1996, Ethics of sex selection for family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection, Human Reproduction, II, 2339, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019109 Sherwin, 1992, 102 Serour, 1999, Complications of assisted reproduction techniques: a review, Assisted Reproduction, 9, 214 Fathalla, 2000, The girl child, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 70, 7, 10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00219-8 Kilani, 2001, Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis at the Farah Hospital, Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 4, 68, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61918-9 Robertson, 2002, Sex selection for gender variety by preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Fertility and Sterility, 78, 463, 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03277-6 The Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, 1999, Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Fertility and Sterility, 72, 595, 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00319-2 Kolata, 2001, vol. 26, A14 Robertson, 2003, Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses, Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 213, 10.1136/jme.29.4.213 Serour, 2001, Assisted reproduction developments in the Islamic world, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ethical and Legal Column, 74, 187, 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00425-8 Pandiyan, 2001, Embryo sex selection: a social comment on the article by Malpani and Malpani, Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 4, 9, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61905-0 Hill, 2002, Is gender selection an appropriate use of medical resources?, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19, 438, 10.1023/A:1016871925450 1998 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Committee on Ethics. Sex Selection Committee opinion No. 177, November 1996 in ACOG Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology (Washington, DC: ACOG, 2002), 85-8, repr. In Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 56 (1997) 199–202. 2001, Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons, Fertility and Sterility, 75, 861, 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01756-3 2003, Sex selection, 9 ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, 2001, The moral status of the pre-implantation embryo, Human Reproduction, 16, 1046, 10.1093/humrep/16.5.1046 The ESHRE Ethics Task Force, 2003, Task force 5 : preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Human Reproduction, 18, 649, 10.1093/humrep/deg110 Congregation for the doctrine of the faith, Instruction on respect for human life in its origin and on the dignity of procreation, 1. 6. p. 20. Flinter, 2001, Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: needs to be tightly regulated editorial, BMJ, 322, 1008, 10.1136/bmj.322.7293.1008 Egozcue, 2002, Preimplantation social sexing: a problem of proportionality and decision making, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19, 440, 10.1023/A:1016824009521 Meseguer, 2002, Gender selection: ethical, scientific, legal and practical issues, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 19, 443, 10.1023/A:1016876026359 Katayama, 2003, US ART practitioners soon to begin their forced march into a regulated future, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 20, 265, 10.1023/A:1024506419990 2003, vol. 12, 363