Transboundary water interaction III: contest and compliance
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acharya, A. (2008). Nonhegemonic international relations: A preliminary conceptualization. Working Paper No. 10-08. Bristol. School of Sociology, Politics, and International Studies, University of Bristol.
Adelphi. (2014). The rise of hydro-diplomacy: Strengthening foreign policy for transboundary waters. Climate Diplomacy Report. Berlin. Adelphi, with the German Federal Foreign Office.
Adhikary, K. D., Ahmad, Q. K., Malla, S. K., Pradhan, B. B., Rahman, K., Rangachari, R., et al. (Eds.). (2000). Cooperation on the Eastern Himalyan Rivers: Opportunities and challenges. New Delhi: Konark Publishers.
Akpinar, A., Kömürcü, I., & Kangka, M. (2011). Development of hydropower energy in Turkey: The case of Coruh river basin. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 1201–1209.
Allan, J. A., & Mirumachi, N. (2010). Why negotiate? Asymmetric endowments, asymmetric power and the invisible nexus of water, trade and power that brings apparent water security. In A. Earle, A. Jägerskog, & J. Öjendal (Eds.), Transboundary water management: Policy and practice (pp. 13–26). London: Earthscan.
Amer, R. (2014). The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam: A counter-hegemonic project or a start of a new hegemonic order? Presentation given at Seventh International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, 12/13 May 2014, London UEA Water Security Research Centre/London Water Research Group.
Amery, H. (2000). A popular theory of water diversion from Lebanon: Toward public participation for peace. In A. Wolf & H. Amery (Eds.), Water in the Middle East: A geography of peace (pp. 121–149). Austin: University of Texas Press.
BBC Monitoring. (2005). Russia to start construction of Tajik power plant late September. Source: ITAR-TASS news agency, Moscow (in Russian). Number. September 19, 2005.
Bekchanov, M., Ringler, C., Bhaduri, A., & Jeuland, M. (2015). How would the Rogun Dam affect water and energy scarcity in Central Asia? Water International, 40(5–6), 856–876.
Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2004). A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: Neo-Gramscian perspectives in international relations. Capital & Class, 83, 85–113.
Brochmann, M. (2012). Basin asymmetries and the risk of conflict in International River Basins Chapter 4 in Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Interaction in International River.
Basins. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Oslo.
Burawoy, M. (2003). For a sociological Marxism: The complementary convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics & Society, 31(2), 193–261.
Carroll, W. K. (2006). Hegemony, counter-hegemony, anti-hegemony. Keynote Address to the Annual Meeting fo the Society for Socialist Studies, York University, Toronto.
Cascão, A. E. (2007). Conceptualising counter hegemony and its application to power relations in transboundary river basins. Paper prepared for discussion prior to the Third International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, London School of Economics, London, UK, London Water Research Group.
Cascão, A. E. (2008). Ethiopia-challenges to Egyptian hegemony in the Nile Basin. Water Policy, 10(S2), 13–28.
Cascão, A. E. (2009a). Political economy of water resources management and allocation in the Eastern Nile River Basin. London: Department of Geography, King’s College London.
Cascão, A. E. (2009b). Changing power relations in the Nile river basin: Unilateralism vs. cooperation? Water Alternatives, 2(2), 245–268.
Cascão, A. E., & Zeitoun, M. (2010a). Changing nature of bargaining power in the hydropolitical relations in the Nile River Basin. In A. Earle, A. Jägerskog, & J. Öjendal (Eds.), Transboundary water management: Principles and practice (pp. 189–194). London: Earthscan.
Cascão, A. E., & Zeitoun, M. (2010b). Tactics to counter hegemony in transboundary river basins. Presentation prepared in advance of the Fifth International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, London School of Economics, London, UK, London Water Research Group.
Çonker, A. (2014). An enhanced notion of power for inter-state and transnational hydropolitics: An analysis of Turkish-Syrian water relations and the Ilisu Dam. Ph.D. thesis submitted to the School of International Development. University of East Anglia.
Cox, R. W. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. In R. W. Cox & T. J. Sinclair (Eds.), Approaches to world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daoudy, M. (2009). Asymmetric power: Negotiating water in the Euphrates and Tigris. International Negotiation, 14(2), 361–391.
Daoudy, M. (2007). Conceptualizing and disentangling cooperation. Presentation given at the Third International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, 12 and 13 May 2007, London School of Economics, London, UK, London Water Research Group.
Davidson-Harden, A., Naidoo, A., & Harden, A. (2007). The geopolitics of the water justice movement. Peace, Conflict and Development, 11, 1–34.
de Sousa Santos, B. (2005). Beyond neoliberal governance: The World Social Forum as subaltern cosmopolitan politics and legality. In B. de Sousa Santos & C. A. Rodriguez-Garavito (Eds.), Law and globalization from below (pp. 92–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DFID. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: The Department for International Development.
Dinar, S. (2000). Negotiations and international relations: A framework for hydropolitics. International Negotiation, 5, 375–407.
Dinar, S. (2009). Power asymmetry and negotiations in international river basins. International Negotiation, 14(2), 329–360.
Dinar, S., Dinar, A., & Kurukulasuriya, P. (2011). Scarcity and cooperation along international rivers: An empirical assessment of bilateral treaties1. International Studies Quarterly, 55(3), 809–833. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00671.x .
Dinar, A., Katz, D., De Stefano L., & Blankspoor, B. (2012). Climate change, conflict, and cooperation: Global analysis of the resilience of international river treaties to increased water variability. Rethinking Climate Change, Conflict, and Security Conference, University of Sussex, 18–19 October 2012.
Domènech, L., March, H., & Saurí, D. (2013). Contesting large-scale water supply projects at both ends of the pipe in Kathmandu and Melamchi Valleys, Nepal. Geoforum, 47, 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.002 .
D’Souza, R. (2002). At the confluence of law and geography: Contextualising inter-state water disputes in India. Geoforum, 33, 255–269.
Ducrot, R., & Barban, V. (2008). From revindication to proposition: Capacity building in negotiation about water management in Periurban areas. The ‘Teraguas’ Approach in Sao Paolo, Brazil. 13th World Water Congress, International Water Resources Association, Montpellier, September 2008.
Eissa, S. (2008). International law and hydro-hegemony in the Nile Basin: A Sudanese perspective. Water Policy, 10(S2), 29–49.
Farnum, R. L., Hawkins, S., & Tamarin, M. (2016). Hydro-hegemons and international water law. In A. Rieu-Clarke (Ed.), Handbook on water law and policy. London: Routledge (Forthcoming).
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1999). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.
Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.
Frey, F. W. (1993). The political context of conflict and cooperation over international river basins. Water International, 18(1), 54–68.
Funder, M., Bustamente, R., Cossio, V., Huong, P. T. M., van Koppen, B., Mweemba, C., et al. (2012). Strategies of the poorest in local water conflict and cooperation—Evidence from Vietnam, Bolivia and Zambia. Water Alternatives, 5(1), 20–36.
Gargiulo, M. (1993). Two-step leverage: Managing constraint in organizational politics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 1–19.
Hamann, R. (2005). The power of the status quo. In J. T. Scholz & B. Stiftel (Eds.), Adaptive governance and water conflict: New institutions for collaborative planning. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
Hawkins, S. (2014). Levelling the playing-field with international water law: Combating power asymmetries in the Israel-Palestine water conflict. M.Sc. thesis submitted to the School of International Development. University of East Anglia, Norwich.
Hensengerth, O. (2015). Where is the power? Transnational networks, authority and the dispute over the Xayaburi Dam on the Lower Mekong Mainstream. Water International, 40(5–6), 911–928.
Ibrahim, A. M. (2011). The Nile basin cooperative framework agreement in the beginning of the end of Egyptian hydro-political hegemony. Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review, 18, 283–313.
Julien, F. (2012). Hydropolitics is what societies make of it (or why we need a constructivist approach to the geopolitics of water). International Journal of Sustainable Society, 4(1/2), 45–71.
Karriem, A. (2009). The rise and transformation of the Brazilian landless movement into a counter-hegemonic political actor: A Gramscian analysis. Geoforum, 40(3), 316–325. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.10.005 .
Kehl, J. R. (2011). Hydropolitical complexes and asymmetrical power: Conflict, cooperation, and governance of international river systems. Journal of World-Systems Research, XVII(1), 218–235.
Kistin, E. J. (2010). Critiquing cooperation: The dynamic effects of transboundary water regimes. Department of International Development. University of Oxford, Oxford.
Koskenniemi, M. (2005). From apology to Utopia: The structure of international legal argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kotter, S. (1985). Power and influence: Beyond formal authority. New York: Free Press.
Kramer, A., & Kibaroglu, A. (2011). Turkey’s position towards international water law. In A. Kibaroglu, W. Scheumann, & A. Kramer (Eds.), Turkey’s water policy: National frameworks and international cooperation. Heidelberg: Springer.
La Bohetie, E. (1549). Discours de la servitude volontaire. Bordeaux: édition électronique réalisée par Claude Ovtcharenko. http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/la_boetie_etienne_de/discours_de_la_servitude/discours_servitude_volontaire.pdf .
Levy, D. L. (2008). Political Contestation in Global Production Networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963.
Loftus, A., & Lumsden, F. (2007). Reworking hegemony in the urban waterscape. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 109–126.
Lukes, S. (2005a). Power and the battle for hearts and minds. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 477–493.
Lustick, I. S. (2002). Hegemony and the riddle of nationalism: The dialectics of nationalism and religion in the Middle East. Logos, 1(13 (Summer 2002)), 18–44.
Masih, I. (2011). Understanding hydrological variability for improved water management in the Semi-Arid Karkeh Basin, Iran. Delft University of Technology, Ph.D. Dissertation.
Matthews, N., & Geheb, K. (Eds.). (2015). Hydropower development in the Mekong Region: Political, socio-economic and environmental perspectives. Routledge: London.
McCaffrey, S. (2007). The law of international watercourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mekonnen, D. Z. (2010). The Nile basin cooperative framework agreement negotiations and the adoption of a ‘Water Security’ paradigm: Flight into obscurity or a logical Cul-de-sac? European Journal of International Law, 21, 421–440.
Menga, F. (2014). Power and dams in Central Asia. Department of Social Sciences and Institutions. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Cagliari, Cagliari.
Mirumachi, N. (2013). Securitising shared waters: An analysis of the hydropolitical context of the Tanakpur Barrage project between Nepal and India. The Geographical Journal, 179(4), 309–319.
Mirumachi, N. (2014). Rethinking TWINS for counter-hegemony. Presentation given at Seventh International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, 12/13 May 2014, London UEA Water Security Research Centre/London Water Research Group.
Mirumachi, N., & Van Wyk, E. (2010). Cooperation at different scales: Challenges for local and international water resource governance in South Africa. The Geographical Journal, 176(1), 25–38.
Molle, F. (2008). Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: Insights from the water sector. Water Alternatives, 1(1), 131–156.
Mollinga, P. P. (2005). The water resources policy process in India: Centralisation, polarisation and new demands on governance. Working Paper Series No. 7. Bonn. Center for Development Research, Department of Political and Cultural Change, University of Bonn.
Mollinga, P. (2010). The material conditions of a polarized discourse: Clamours and silences in critical analysis of agricultural water use in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(3), 414–436.
Nasrallah, H. (2006). Hezbollah leader addresses “Victory Rally” in Lebanon. BBC Monitoring International Reports 23 September 2006, re-posted on Informed Comment blog, Juan Cole.
Newton, J. (2014). “Water, water everywhere, nor any drop to drink”: An exploration of the lack of a formal global water governance regime. Ph.D. thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. Tufts University, Medford.
Nicol, A., & Cascão, A. E. (2011). Against the flow—New power dynamics and upstream mobilisation in the Nile Basin. Review of African Political Economy, 38(128), 317–325.
Norman, E. S. (2012). Cultural politics and transboundary resource governance in the Salish Sea. Water Alternatives, 5(1), 138–160.
Pak, M., & Wegerich, K. (2014). Competition and benefit sharing in the Ferghana Valley: Soviet negotiations on transboundary small reservoir construction. Central Asian Affairs, 1, 225–246.
Paul, T. V. (2006). Why has the India-Pakistan rivalry been so enduring? Power asymmetry and an intractable conflict. Security Studies, 15(4), 600–630. doi: 10.1080/09636410601184595 .
Persaud, R. B. (2001). Counter-hegemony and foreign policy: The dialectics of marginalized and global forces in Jamaica. New York: State University of New York Press.
Phillips, D., Daoudy, M., Öjendal, J., Turton, A., & McCaffrey, S. (2006). Trans-boundary water cooperation as a tool for conflict prevention and broader benefit-sharing. Stockholm: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
PWA. (2011). The final report. (Report 6 of the CSO-G). The Gaza Emergency Technical Assistance Programme (GETAP) on Water Supply to the Gaza Strip: Component 1—The Comparative Study of Options for an Additional Supply of Water for the Gaza Strip (CSO-G). Ramallah. Palestinian Water Authority.
PWA. (2012). The positive-sum outcome: A solution for all (brochure). Ramallah: Palestinian Water Authority.
Randall, A., & Charlesworth, A. (Eds.). (2000). The moral economy as an argument and as a fight. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Rieu-Clarke, A., Moynihan, R., & Magsig, B.-O. (2012). UN Watercourses Convention: User’s guide. IHP-HELP Centre for Water Law, University of Dundee.
Rodríguez, I., & Correa, H. D. (2006). Lessons, approaches, and challenges to transforming socio-environmental conflicts in Latin America: The “C&C” program experience. In H. Darío Correa & I. Rodríguez (Eds.), Environmental crossroads in Latin America: Between managing and transforming natural resource conflicts. San José: University for Peace.
Rupert, M. (1993). Alienation, capitalism, and the inter-state system: Toward a Marxian/Gramscian critique. In S. Gill (Ed.), Gramsci, historical materialism, and international relations (pp. 67–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2005). Cooperation on international rivers: A continuum for securing and sharing benefits. Water International, 30(4), 420–427.
Sadoff, C., Harshadeepa, N. R., Blackmore, D., Wuc, X., O’Donella, A., Jeland, M., et al. (2013). Ten fundamental questions for water resources development in the Ganges: Myths and realities. Water Policy, 15, 147–164.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Salman, Salman M. A. (2011). The new state of South Sudan and the hydro-politics of the Nile Basin. Water International, 36(2), 154–166.
Schmeier, S., Gerlak, A. K., & Blumstein, S. (2015). Clearing the muddy waters of shared watercourses governance: conceptualizing international River Basin Organizations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10.1007/s10784-015-9287-4 .
Scott, J. C. (2000). The moral economy as an argument and as a fight. In A. Randall & A. Charlesworth (Eds.), Moral economy and popular protest: Crowds, conflict and authority (pp. 187–208). New York: St Martin’s Press.
Scott, J. (2001). Power. London: Polity Press.
Selby, J. (2003). Water, power and politics in the Middle East—The other Israeli-Palestinian conflict. London: I.B. Tauris.
Selby, J. (2013). Cooperation, domination and colonisation: The Israeli-Palestinian Joint Water Committee. Water Alternatives, 6(1), 1–24.
Selby, J. (2007). Beyond hydro-hegemony: Transnational hegemonic structures and national hegemonic projects. Presentation given at the Third International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, 12 and 13 May 2007, London School of Economics, London, UK, London Water Research Group.
Shalpykova, G. (2014). Unmasking the face of ‘Riparian Cooperation’ in the Syr Darya River Basin. Ph.D. thesis. University of Nottingham.
Shamir, R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: A case of hegemony and counter-hegemony. In B. de SousaSantos & C. A. Rodriguez-Garavito (Eds.), Law and globalization from below (pp. 92–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharp, G. (1973). The politics of nonviolent action. Boston: Porter Sargent.
Shikaki. (1999). The corridor—The geographic link between the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Ramallah, West Bank, Negotiations Affairs Department, Palestine Liberation Organisation.
Sosland, J. K. (2007). Cooperating rivals: The riparian politics of the Jordan River Basin. New York: State University of New York Press.
Stetter, S., Herschinger, E., Teichler, T., & Albert, M. (2011). Conflicts about water: Securitizations in a global context. Cooperation and Conflict, 46, 441–459.
Suhardiman, D., Giordano, M., & Molle, F. (2012). Scalar disconnect: The logic of transboundary water governance in the Mekong. Society and Natural Resources, 25, 572–586.
Swatuk, L. A. (2015). Water conflict and cooperation in Southern Africa. WIREs Water,. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1070 .
Tawfik, R. (2015). Revisiting hydro-hegemony from a benefit-sharing perspective: The case of the grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Discussion Paper 5/2015. Bonn. German Development Institute.
Theesfeld, I. (2011). Perceived power resources in situations of collective action. Water Alternatives, 4(1), 86–103.
Verghese, B. G., & Iyer, R. R. (1993). Harnessing the Eastern Himalyan Rivers: Regional Cooperation in South Asia. New Delhi: Konark Publishers.
Wagner, R. H. (1988). Economic interdependence, bargaining power, and political influence. International Organization, 42(3), 461–483.
Warner, J. (2005). Hydro-hegemony as a layered cake: Hydro-hegemonic strategies in the case of Turkey. Presentation given at First Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, 21/22 May 2005, King’s College London, London, UK, London Water Research Group.
Warner, J. (2007). Hegemony and power. Presentation given at the Third International Workshop on Hydro-Hegemony, May 2007, London School of Economics, London, UK, London Water Research Group.
Warner, J. (2011a). The struggle over Turkey’s Illisu Dam: Domestic and international security linkages. In K. Wegerich & J. Warner (Eds.), The politics of water: A survey. London: Routledge.
Warner, J., & Zawahri, N. (2012). Hegemony and asymmetry: Multiple-chessboard games on transboundary rivers. International Environmental Agreements, 12, 215–229.
Wessels, I. J. (2015). Challenging hydro-hegemony: Hydro-politics and local resistance in the Golan Heights and the Palestinian territories. International Journal of Environmental Studies,. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2015.1041836 .
Westerveld, L. (2012). Hegemony in hot water: Who gets what, when and how? Israeli Hydro-Hegemony and Civil Society in Lebanon. M.Sc. Thesis in Political Science and International Relations. University of Amsterdam.
Whittington, D., Waterbury, J., & Jeuland, M. (2014). The Grand Renaissance Dam and prospects for cooperation on the Eastern Nile. Water Policy, 16, 595–608.
Wolf, A. T. (Ed.). (2002). Conflict prevention and resolution in water systems. The Management of Water Series. Cheltenham: Elgar.
World Bank. (2014). Ganges strategic basin assessment: A discussion of regional opportunities and risks. Washington, D.C: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Worth, O. (2002). The Janus-like character of counter-hegemony: Progressive and nationalist responses to neoliberalism. Global Society, 16(3), 297–315.
Worth, O., & Kuhling, C. (2004). Counter-hegemony anti-globalisation and culture in International Political Economy. Capital & Class, 84, 31–42.
WWF-DFID. (2010). International architecture for transboundary water resources management: Policy analysis and recommendations. London. Worldwide Fund for Nature and the UK Department for International Development, with Pegasys Strategy and Development, and the UNESCO Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science.
Zawahri, N. (2008a). International rivers and national security: The Euphrates, Ganges-Brahmaputra, Indus, Tigris and Yarmouk rivers. Natural Resources Forum, 32, 280–289.
Zawahri, N. (2008b). Capturing the nature of cooperation, unstable cooperation, and conflict over International Rivers: The story of the Indus, Yarmouk, Euphrates, and Tigris Rivers. Accepted in International Journal of Global Environmental Issues.
Zeitoun, M., & Jägerskog, A. (2011). Addressing power asymmetry: How transboundary water management may serve to reduce poverty. Report No. 29. Stockholm. Stockholm International Water Institute.
Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements, 8(4), 297–316.
Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., & Warner, J. (2011). Transboundary water interaction II: Soft power underlying conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements, 11(2), 159–178.
Zeitoun, M., Eid-Sabbagh, K., Talhami, M., & Dajani, M. (2013a). Hydro-hegemony in the Upper Jordan Waterscape: Control and use of the flows. Water Alternatives, 6(1), 86–106.
Zeitoun, M., Talhami, M., & Eid-Sabbagh, K. (2013b). The influence of narratives on negotiations over and resolution of the upper Jordan River conflict. International Negotiation, 18(2), 293–322.
Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of transboundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(2006), 435–460.