Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abunge, 2013, Connecting marine ecosystem services to human well-being: insights from participatory well-being assessment in Kenya, Ambio, 42, 1010, 10.1007/s13280-013-0456-9
Anselin, 1995, Local indicators of spatial association - LISA, Geographical Anal., 27, 93, 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
Arkema, 2015, Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112, 7390, 10.1073/pnas.1406483112
Arnold, 1998, Large area hydrological modeling and assessment. Part I: model development, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34, 73, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
Arrow, 2014, Should governments use a declining discount rate in project analysis?, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 8, 145, 10.1093/reep/reu008
Arthaud, 1996, A methodology for estimating production possibility frontiers for wildlife habitat and timber value at the landscape level, Can. J. For. Res., 26, 2191, 10.1139/x26-248
Bagstad, 2013, Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services, Ecosystem Services, 4, 117, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012
Barnett, 2016, Mapping trade-offs in ecosystem services from reforestation in the Mississippi alluvial valley, Bioscience, 66, 223, 10.1093/biosci/biv181
Bateman, 2013, Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom, Science, 341, 45, 10.1126/science.1234379
Bennett, 2009, Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services, Ecol. Lett., 12, 1394, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
Bennett, 2015, Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 14, 76, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007
Berbés-Blázquez, 2016, Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 19, 134, 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.02.003
Braat, 2012, The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy, Ecosystem Services, 1, 4, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011
Castro, 2014, Ecosystem service trade-offs from the supply to social demand: a landscape-scale spatial analysis, Landscape Urban Plann., 132, 102, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.009
Cao, 2011, Spatial multi-objective land use optimization: extensions to the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II, Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci., 25, 1949, 10.1080/13658816.2011.570269
Cavender-Bares, 2015, A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services, Ecol. Soc., 20, 17, 10.5751/ES-06917-200117
Cavender-Bares, 2015, Ecosystem service trade-offs across global contexts and scales, Ecol. Soc., 20, 22, 10.5751/ES-07137-200122
Coello Coello, 2007
Crossman, 2013, A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services, Ecosystem Services, 4, 4, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001
Crouzat, 2015, Assessing bundles of ecosystem services from regional to landscape scale: insights from the French Alps, J. Appl. Ecol., 52, 1145, 10.1111/1365-2664.12502
Daily, 2009, Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver, Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 21, 10.1890/080025
Daw, 2011, Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being, Environ. Conserv., 38, 370, 10.1017/S0376892911000506
Daw, 2015, Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112, 6949, 10.1073/pnas.1414900112
Deb, 2002, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 6, 182, 10.1109/4235.996017
Deb, K., Köksalan, M. (2010) Guest Editorial Special Issue on preference-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 14, 669–670.
Delzeit, 2016, Addressing future trade-offs between biodiversity and cropland expansion to improve food security, Reg. Environ. Change
Deng, 2016, A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management, J. Geog. Sci., 26, 953, 10.1007/s11442-016-1309-9
Diaz, 2006, Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being, PLoS Biol., 4, e277, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277
Dittrich, 2017, Mapping and analysing historical indicators of ecosystem services in Germany, Ecol. Ind., 75, 101, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.010
Duku, 2015, Towards ecosystem accounting: a comprehensive approach to modelling multiple hydrological ecosystem services, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4377, 10.5194/hess-19-4377-2015
Eikelboom, 2015, A spatial optimization algorithm for geodesign, Landscape Urban Plann., 144, 10, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.08.011
Förster, 2015, Assessing ecosystem services for informing land use decisions: a problem-oriented approach, Ecol. Soc., 20, 31, 10.5751/ES-07804-200331
Francesconi, 2016, Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model ecosystem services: a systematic review, J. Hydrol., 535, 625, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.034
Gaddis, 2014, Spatial optimization of best management practices to attain water quality targets, Water Resour. Manage, 28, 1485, 10.1007/s11269-013-0503-0
Gantioler, S.R.M., Bassi, S., Kettunen, M., McConville, A., Landgrebe, R., Gerdes, H., ten Brink, P. (2010) Costs and socio-economic benefits associated with the Natura 2000 network. In: Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment on Contract ENV.B.2/SER/2008/0038. Institute for European Environmental Policy/GHK/Ecologic, Brussels.
García-Llorente, 2015, Biophysical and sociocultural factors underlying spatial trade-offs of ecosystem services in semiarid watersheds, Ecol. Soc., 20, 39, 10.5751/ES-07785-200339
Gardner, 2010
Geijzendorffer, 2015, Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments, Ecol. Ind., 52, 320, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016
Goldstein, 2012, Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 7565, 10.1073/pnas.1201040109
González-Esquivel, 2015, Ecosystem service trade-offs, perceived drivers, and sustainability in contrasting agroecosystems in central Mexico, Ecol. Soc., 20, 38, 10.5751/ES-06875-200138
Grêt-Regamey, 2014, On the effects of scale for ecosystem services mapping, PLoS ONE, 9, e112601, 10.1371/journal.pone.0112601
Haase, 2012, Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle region, Germany, Ecol. Soc., 17, 22, 10.5751/ES-04853-170322
Hamann, 2015, Mapping social–ecological systems: Identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘redloop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use, Global Environ. Change, 34, 218, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.008
Hanspach, 2014, A holistic approach to studying social-ecological systems and its application to southern Transylvania, Ecol. Soc., 19, 32, 10.5751/ES-06915-190432
Hattam, 2015, Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: mixed methods or mixed messages?, Ecol. Econ., 120, 126, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.011
Heal, 2014, Agreeing to disagree on climate policy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111, 3695, 10.1073/pnas.1315987111
Hein, 2006, Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services, Ecol. Econ., 57, 209, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
Hicks, 2013, Synergies and tradeoffs in how managers, scientists, and fishers value coral reef ecosystem services, Global Environ. Change, 23, 1444, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.028
Holland, 2011, The influence of temporal variation on relationships between ecosystem services, Biodivers. Conserv., 20, 3285, 10.1007/s10531-011-0113-1
Howe, 2014, Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world, Global Environ. Change, 28, 263, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005
Kari, 2013, Framing local outcomes of biodiversity conservation through ecosystem services: a case study from Ranomafana, Madagascar, Ecosystem Services, 3, e32, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.12.003
Kehoe, 2015, Global patterns of agricultural land-use intensity and vertebrate diversity, Divers. Distrib., 21, 1308, 10.1111/ddi.12359
Kenter, 2015, What are shared and social values of ecosystems?, Ecol. Econ., 111, 86, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006
King, 2015, Trade-offs in ecosystem services and varying stakeholder preferences: evaluating conflicts, obstacles, and opportunities, Ecol. Soc., 20, 25, 10.5751/ES-07822-200325
Klein, 2003, Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees, Proc. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 270, 955, 10.1098/rspb.2002.2306
Kline, J.D. & Mazzotta, M.J. (2012) Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services in the management of public lands. In: Gen. Tech. Rep. PNWGTR-65. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
Kovács, 2015, Understanding the links between ecosystem service trade-offs and conflicts in protected areas, Ecosystem Services, 12, 117, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.012
Kroll, 2012, Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics, Land Use Policy, 29, 521, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008
Lautenbach, 2011, Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data, Ecol. Ind., 11, 676, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.007
Lautenbach, 2013, Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment, Environ. Model. Software, 48, 98, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.006
Lee, 2016, A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services, Ecol. Ind., 66, 340, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004
Lester, 2013, Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning, Marine Policy, 38, 80, 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.022
Levers, 2016, Archetypical patterns and trajectories of land systems in Europe, Reg. Environ. Change
Lienhoop, 2016, Preference refinement in deliberative choice experiments for ecosystem service valuation, Land Economics, 92, 555, 10.3368/le.92.3.555
Lienhoop, 2015, Informing biodiversity policy: the role of economic valuation, deliberative institutions and deliberative monetary valuation, Environ. Sci. Policy, 54, 522, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.007
Logsdon, 2013, A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services, Ecol. Model., 257, 57, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.009
Mace, 2012, Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship, Trends Ecol. Evol., 27, 19, 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006
Mach, 2015, Human impacts and ecosystem services: insufficient research for trade-off evaluation, Ecosystem Services, 16, 112, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.018
Martinez-Harms, 2015, Making decisions for managing ecosystem services, Biol. Conserv., 184, 229, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024
Martín-López, 2012, Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences, PLoS ONE, 7, e38970, 10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
Martín-López, 2014, Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment, Ecol. Ind., 37, 220, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003
Mastrangelo, 2014, Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services, Landscape Ecol., 29, 345, 10.1007/s10980-013-9959-9
Memmah, 2015, Metaheuristics for agricultural land use optimization. A review, Agron. Sustainable Dev., 35, 975, 10.1007/s13593-015-0303-4
Mouchet, 2014, An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services, Global Environ. Change, 28, 298, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012
Nelson, 2008, Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105, 9471, 10.1073/pnas.0706178105
Nelson, 2009, Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales, Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 4, 10.1890/080023
O'Neill, 2001, Representing people, representing nature, representing the world, Environ. Plann. C: Government Policy, 19, 483, 10.1068/c12s
Palomo, 2011, Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social-ecological system in southwestern Spain, Ecol. Soc., 16, 23, 10.5751/ES-03862-160123
Partidario, 2013, Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 40, 36, 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.001
Polasky, 2008, Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns, Biol. Conserv., 141, 1505, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022
Queiroz, 2015, Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape, Ambio, 44, 89, 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0
Quintas-Soriano, 2014, From supply to social demand: a landscape-scale analysis of the water regulation service, Landscape Ecol., 29, 1069, 10.1007/s10980-014-0032-0
Raudsepp-Hearne, 2010, Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107, 5242, 10.1073/pnas.0907284107
Rega, 2015, Public participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment: a practitioners' perspective, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 50, 105, 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.007
Renard, 2015, Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112, 13411, 10.1073/pnas.1502565112
Robards, 2011, The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services, Global Environ. Change, 21, 522, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.004
Rodriquez, 2006, Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services, Ecol. Soc., 11, 28, 10.5751/ES-01667-110128
Ruijs, 2013, Trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in Eastern Europe, Ecosystem Services, 4, 82, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.002
Sanon, 2012, Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria, J. Environ. Manage., 111, 159, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008
Scholes, 2013, Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social-ecological systems and their ecosystem services, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 5, 16, 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.01.004
Seppelt, 2013, Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 5, 458, 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.002
Setälä, 2014, Urban and agricultural soils: conflicts and trade-offs in the optimization of ecosystem services, Urban Ecosystems, 17, 239, 10.1007/s11252-013-0311-6
Shackleton, 2016, Unpacking Pandora’s box: understanding and categorising ecosystem disservices for environmental management and human wellbeing, Ecosystems, 19, 587, 10.1007/s10021-015-9952-z
Spangenberg, 2014, Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies, Int. J. Biodivers. Sci., Ecosystem Services Manage., 10, 40, 10.1080/21513732.2014.884166
Spangenberg, 2015, Stakeholder involvement in ESS research and governance: between conceptual ambition and practical experiences – risks, challenges and tested tools, Ecosystem Services, 16, 201, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.006
Spash, 2008, Deliberative monetary valuation and the evidence for a new value theory, Land Economics, 84, 469, 10.3368/le.84.3.469
Suwarno, 2015, Who benefits from ecosystem services? A case study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, Environ. Manage., 57, 331, 10.1007/s00267-015-0623-9
Tallis, 2009, Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1162, 265, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x
Temper, 2013, The god of the mountain and Godavarman: net present value, indigenous territorial rights and sacredness in a bauxite mining conflict in India, Ecol. Econ., 96, 79, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.011
Turkelboom, F., Thoonen, M., Jacobs, S., García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Berry, P. (2015) Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies. OpenNESS Synthesis Paper No 27: ‘Ecosystem Service Trade-offs and Synergies’, 1–7.
Turner, 2014, Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape, Landscape Urban Plann., 125, 89, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
Turner, 2016, A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration, Ecol. Model., 319, 190, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.07.017
Underdal, 2010, Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance, Global Environ. Change, 20, 386, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.005
Václavík, 2013, Mapping global land system archetypes, Global Environ. Change, 23, 1637, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.004
Vatn, 2009, An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal, Ecol. Econ., 68, 2207, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.005
Villa, 2014, A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment, PLoS ONE, 9, e91001, 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001
Villamagna, 2013, Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery, Ecol. Complexity, 15, 114, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004
von Döhren, 2015, Ecosystem disservices research: a review of the state of the art with a focus on cities, Ecol. Ind., 52, 490, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.027
von Wehrden, 2014, Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history, Landscape Ecol., 29, 941, 10.1007/s10980-014-0038-7
Wehrens, 2007, Self- and super-organizing maps in R: the kohonen package, J. Stat. Softw., 21, 1, 10.18637/jss.v021.i05
White, 2011, Recognizing the value of biodiversity: new approaches to policy assessment, 129
Willemen, 2010, Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region, Ecol. Ind., 10, 62, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.02.015
Wittmer, 2006, How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts?, Land Use Policy, 23, 1, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.003
Wolff, 2015, Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives, Ecol. Ind., 55, 159, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016