Towards defining aquatic ecosystem health for the Great Lakes

Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health - Tập 1 - Trang 97-107 - 1992
John H. hartig1, Michael A. Zarull2
1International Joint Commission, Windsor, Canada
2National Water Research Institute, Lakes Research Branch, Burlington, Canada

Tóm tắt

The Canada — U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement defines Areas of Concern as geographic areas that fail to meet the general or specific objectives of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement where such failure has caused or is likely to cause impairment of beneficial use or the area's ability to support aquatic life. Impairment of beneficial use is defined by the Agreement as a change in the physical, chemical or biological integrity sufficient to cause any one of 14 designated use impairments. In 1987 the International Joint Commission's Great Lakes Water Quality Board (GLWQB) recommended that criteria be developed to determine when ecosystem conditions have been impacted enough to warrant designation as an Area of Concern and when conditions have improved sufficiently to be delisted. Based on scientific input and policy considerations, the GLWQB adopted, in principle, a set of quantitative and qualitative listing/delisting criteria for each of the 14 use impairments. These criteria can be uniformly applied throughout the basin. Further, the GLWQB recommended future refinement of these criteria based on advances in science and public input.

Tài liệu tham khảo

American Public Health Association, 1989. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 17th edn. Washington, D.C. 1624 pp. Canada & the United States, 1972. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Signed at Ottawa, Ontario, 15 April 1972. Canada & the United States, 1987. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Signed at Toledo, Ohio, 18 November 1987. HartigJ. H. & R. L.Thomas, 1988. Development of plants to restore degraded areas in the Great Lakes. Environ. Managem. 12: 327–347. HartigJ. H. & J. R.Vallentyne, 1989. Use of an ecosystem approach to restore degraded areas of the Great Lakes. AMBIO 18(8): 423–428. HartigJ. H., D. E.Rathke & D. J.Williams, 1990a. How clean is clean in Great Lakes Areas of Concern?: Report from the 1988 IAGLR Symposium. J. Great Lakes Res. 16: 169–179. Hartig, J. H., L. Lovett-Doust & P. Seidl, 1990b. Successes and challenges in developing and implementing remedial action plans to restore degraded areas of the Great Lakes. In: J. E. FitzGibbon (ed.), International and Transboundary Water Resources Issues. Amer. Water Resources Assoc. TPS-90-1: 269–278. Henry, M. G., 1988. Invertebrate bioassays: How can they help us determine “How Clean is Clean?”. Pap. Pres. 31st Conf. Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario. Howison R., 1989. A summary of water quality data from Presque Isle Bay, Lake Erie, Pennsylvania. Report to Great Lakes Water Quality Board, Internat. Joint Comm., Windsor, Ontario. IJC (International Joint Commission), 1985. Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Great Lakes Water Quality Board, Windsor, Ontario. IJC, 1987a. Report on Great Lakes Water Quality. Great Lakes Water Quality Board, Windsor, Ontario. IJC, 1987b. Guidance on characterization of toxic substances problems in Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin. Great Lakes Water Quality Board, Windsor, Ontario. IJC, 1988. Procedures for the assessment of contaminated sediment problems in the Great Lakes. Sediment Subcommittee, Great Lakes Water Quality Board, Windsor, Ontario. IJC, 1989. Progress in developing and implementing remedial action plans for Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin. App. A. Great Lakes Water Quality Board, Windsor, Ontario. IJC, 1990. News release on Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania. Washington, D.C. Kubiak, T. J., 1988. Wildlife health in the Great Lakes: An epidemiological approach as the ultimate judge of “How Clean is Clean?”. Pap. Pres. 31st Conf. Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario. Mac, M. J. & S. B. Smith, 1988. Expected tumor incidence rates in fish from clean sites. Pap. Pres. 31st Conf. Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario. Mack, P. J., 1988. Cleanliness: Perspectives of a persuaded population. Pap. Pres. 31st Conf. Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario. Manny, B. A. & R. D. Pacific, 1988. Restoration of fish and wildlife habitat in Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Pap. Pres. 31st Conf. Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario. MDNR (Michigan Department of Natural Resources), 1977. Michigan's water quality standards: Revisions from 1968 to 1977. Lansing, Michigan. MDNR, 1987. Remedial action plan for Deer Lake Area of Concern. Lansing, Michigan. Miller, T. J., 1988. “How Clean is Clean?” from a fish/wildlife/habitat perspective. Plenary Pres. 31st Conf. Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, 1984. Water management: Goals, policies, objectives, and implementation procedures of the Ministry of the Environment. Toronto, Ontario. Reynoldson, T. B., 1988. Benthic invertebrates as ecosystem objectives. Pap. Pres. 31st Conf. Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario. WiemeyerS. N., T. G.Lamont, C. M.Bunck,C. R.Sindelar, F. J.Gramlick, J. D.Fraser & M. A.Byrd, 1984. Organocholrine pesticide, polychlorinated biphenyl and mercury residues in bald eagle eggs-1969–1979-and their relationship to shell-thinning and reproduction. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 13: 529–549. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR), 1987. Lower Green Bay Remedial Action Plan. Pub-WR-175-87. Madison, Wisconsin.