Towards a strategic research agenda for social sciences and humanities in radiological protection

Becker, 2004, Emergency communication and information issues in terrorist events involving radioactive materials, Biosecurity and Bioterrorism-Biodefense Strategy Practice and Science, 2, 195, 10.1089/bsp.2004.2.195

Bergmans, 2014, The participatory turn in radioactive waste management: deliberation and the social-technical divide, Journal of Risk Research, 18, 347, 10.1080/13669877.2014.97133

Bréchignac, 2016, Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium, J. Environ. Radioact., 158–159, 21, 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.03.021

Dubreuil, 2013, Deciding for the future. Application of the aarhus convention in RWM

, 2018, Science with and for society; work programme 2018–2020, H2020

Felt, 2007

Friedrich-Nel, 2015, Radiographers’ opinion on patients’ rights to informed consent: results of an online survey, South African Radiographer, 53, 27

Hevey, 2017, Radon risk and remediation: a psychological perspective, Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00063

, 2018

Impens, 2017, First joint roadmap, draft

Jenkins-Smith, 2011, Reversing nuclear opposition: evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility, Risk Anal., 31, 629, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01543.x

Lazo, 2016

Liland, 2016, Towards a self-sustaining European platform on nuclear and radiological emergency preparedness, response and recovery. Key results of the NERIS-TP European project, Radioprotection, 51, S1, 10.1051/radiopro/2016002

Lofstedt, 2018, The communication of radon risk in Sweden: where are we and where are we going?, Journal of Risk Research, 1, 10.1080/13669877.2018.1473467

Malesic, 2015, Evacuation in the event of a nuclear disaster: planned activity or improvisation?, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 12, 102, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.12.005

Meskens, 2016, The science, politics and ethics of nuclear technology assessment

, 2003

, 2011

Owen, 2012, Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society, Science and Public Policy, 39, 751, 10.1093/scipol/scs093

Perko, 2012, Is knowledge important? Emperical research on nuclear risk communication in two countries, Health Phys., 102, 614, 10.1097/HP.0b013e31823fb5a5

Perko, 2014, Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population, J. Environ. Radioact., 133, 86, 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.04.005

Perko, 2015a, Priorities for radiation protection research: Analysis of the Operra stakeholder survey

Perko, 2015b, Units related to radiation exposure and radioactivity in mass media: the Fukushima case study in Europe and Russia, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 164, 154, 10.1093/rpd/ncu328

Perko, 2016a, Joint research needs and priorities addressing radiation protection research relevant for Social Sciences and Humanities

Perko, 2016b, Communication recommendation related to Ionising Radiation

Perko, 2016c, Improved communication, understanding of risk perception and ethics related to ionising radiation, J. Radiol. Prot., 36, 15, 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/E15

Perko, 2017a, Societal constraints related to environmental remediation and decommissioning programmes, J. Environ. Radioact., 196, 171, 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.06.014

Perko, 2017b, Joint research needs and priorities addressing radiation protection research relevant for Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH)

Prezelj, 2016, The limits of public communication coordination in a nuclear emergency: lessons from media reporting on the Fukushima case, J. Radiol. Prot., 36, 45, 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/S45

Renn, 2008, Risk governance; coping with uncertainty in a complex world

Salomaa, 2017, Joint research needs and priorities addressing radiation protection research relevant for medical use of radiation and communication/risk perception in radiation protection field, D2.10.

Schneider, 2016, NERIS: European platform on preparedness for nuclear and radiological emergency response and recovery—activities and perspectives, Radioprotection, 51, S5, 10.1051/radiopro/2016003

Schneider, 2017, Nuclear and radiological preparedness: the achievements of the European research project PREPARE, Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 173, 151, 10.1093/rpd/ncw318

Schröder, 2015, Advanced research, lagging policy. Nuclear waste governance in Belgium, 141

Sjoberg, 2004, Local acceptance of a high-level nuclear waste repository, Risk Anal., 24, 737, 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00472.x

Slovic, 2000, Nuclear power and the public: a comparative study of risk perception in France and the United States, 10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_2

Slovic, 2012, The perception gap: radiation and risk, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68, 67, 10.1177/0096340212444870

Stirling, 2008a, ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology, Science, Technology and Human Values, 33, 262, 10.1177/0162243907311265

Stirling, 2008b, ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33, 262, 10.1177/0162243907311265

Turcanu, 2014

, 2013

Vanhavere, 2018, Third annual joint priority list

Van Oudheusden, 2018, Absent, yet present? Moving with ‘responsible research and innovation’ in radiation protection research, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5, 241, 10.1080/23299460.2018.1457403

Visschers, 2013, How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster, Risk Anal., 33, 333, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x

Wojcik, 2018, Educating about radiation risks in high schools: towards improved public understanding of the complexity of low-dose radiation health effects, Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 58, 13, 10.1007/s00411-018-0763-4

Železnik, 2016, Lay public mental models of ionizing radiation: representations and risk perception in four European countries, J. Radiol. Prot., 36, S102, 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/S102