Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Hướng tới một hiểu biết tốt hơn về các lợi ích tổ chức ở Trung và Đông Âu
Tóm tắt
Giới thiệu này trình bày tổng quan chung về số đặc biệt này và làm rõ bối cảnh mà hầu hết các đóng góp nảy sinh. Câu hỏi trung tâm, chung cho tất cả các bài viết, là vị trí của các lợi ích tổ chức như một yếu tố của xã hội dân sự trong các bối cảnh hậu cộng sản và hậu chuyển tiếp, các hình thức vận động, tranh cãi và hiện thực hóa sở thích của họ. Các bài viết đề cập đến các lợi ích tổ chức và các mẫu vận động tại bốn quốc gia hậu cộng sản trong ba lĩnh vực chính sách—năng lượng, chăm sóc sức khỏe và giáo dục đại học. Chắc chắn rằng, một bộ sưu tập hạn chế các bài viết chỉ có thể giải quyết một số khoảng trống nghiên cứu tồn tại trong lĩnh vực chủ đề này. Tuy nhiên, các quan điểm được trình bày ở đây khác biệt đáng kể so với cái nhìn chính thống về xã hội dân sự hậu cộng sản và các nhóm lợi ích, cái mà cho đến gần đây thường thiếu một quan điểm so sánh và, phần lớn, vẫn chưa xem xét các xu hướng thoái lui dân chủ đang diễn ra trong khu vực.
Từ khóa
#các lợi ích tổ chức #xã hội dân sự #hậu cộng sản #chuyển tiếp #chính sách năng lượng #chăm sóc sức khỏe #giáo dục đại họcTài liệu tham khảo
Agh, A. 1999. Europeanization of policy-making in East Central Europe: The Hungarian approach to EU accession. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (5): 839–854.
Avdagic, S. 2005. State-labour relations in East Central Europe: Explaining variations in union effectiveness. Socio-Economic Review 3 (1): 25–53.
Baumgartner, F.R., et al. 2009. Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F., and B. Leech. 1998. Basic Interests: The importance of groups and politics and in political science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Beyers, J., D. Fink-Hafner, W.A. Maloney, et al. 2020. The comparative interest Group-survey project: Design, practical lessons, and data sets. Interest Groups and Advocacy 9: 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-020-00082-0.
Boerzel, Tanja, and Aron Buzogány. 2010. Environmental organisations and the Europeanisation of public policy in Central and Eastern Europe: The case of biodiversity governance. Environmental Politics 19 (5): 708–735.
Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Borragán, N.P.-S. 2006. Post-communist interest politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 7 (2): 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850600839868.
Bromley, P., E. Schofer, and W. Longhofer. 2020. Contentions over world culture: The rise of legal restrictions on foreign funding to NGOs, 1994–2015. Social Forces 99 (1): 281–304.
Bruszt, L., and D. Stark. 1998. Postsocialist pathways: Transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Císař, O., and K. Vráblíková. 2019. National protest agenda and the dimensionality of party politics: Evidence from four East-Central European democracies. European Journal of Political Research 58 (4): 1152–1171.
Cox, T., and S. Gallai. 2014. Civil society and policy actors in post-communist Hungary: Linkages and contexts. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 15 (1): 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2013.801705.
Cox, T., and L. Vass. 2000. Government-interest group relations in Hungarian Politics since 1989. Europe-Asia Studies 52 (6): 1095–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130050143842.
Cox, T. (2012). Interest representation and state-society relations in East Central Europe. Aleksanteri Papers 2/2012.
Crouch, C., and W. Streeck. 2006. The Diversity of democracy corporatism, social order and political conflict. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dahl, R.A. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dimitrov, V., K. Goetz, and H. Wollmann. 2006. Governing after communism: Institutions And policymaking. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Dobbins, M., and R. Riedel. 2021. Exploring organized interests in post-communist policy-making: The missing link. Abingdon: Routledge.
Duman, A., and L. Kurekova. 2012. The role of state in development of socio-economic models in Hungary and Slovakia: The case of industrial policy. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (8): 1207–1228.
Dür, A., and D. De Bièvre. 2007. The question of interest group influence. Journal of Public Policy 27 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X07000591.
Duvanova, D. (2007) Interest groups in post-communist countries: a comparative analysis of business and employer associations. Ph.D Thesis. Ohio State University.
Eising, R. 2008. Interest groups in EU policy-making. Living Reviews in European Governance 3 (4): 4–32. https://doi.org/10.12942/lreg-2008-4.
Ekiert, G., and J. Kubin. 1998. Contentious Politics in New Democracies: East Germany, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, 1989–93. World Politics 50 (4): 547–581.
Enyedi, Z., and F.C. Bértoa. 2018. Institutionalization and De-institutionalization in post-communist party systems. East European Politics and Societies 32 (3): 422–450.
Fagan, A., and P. Kopecký. 2017. The Routledge handbook of East European politics, 1st ed. Milton: Taylor and Francis.
Fink-Hafner, D. 1998. Organized interests in the policy-making process in Slovenia. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (2): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017698343992.
Fink-Hafner, D. 2011. Interest representation and post-communist parliaments over two decades. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (2): 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.574027.
Foa, R.S., and G. Ekiert. 2017. The weakness of postcommunist civil society reassessed. European Journal of Political Research 56 (2): 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12182.
Fraussen, B., J. Beyers, and T. Donas. 2015. ’The expanding core and varying degrees of insiderness: Institutionalised interest group access to advisory councils’. Political Studies 63 (3): 569–588.
Greskovits, B. 2015. The hollowing and backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe. Global Policy 6 (S1): 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12225.
Grzymała-Busse, A. 2003. Political competition and the politicization of the State in Central and Eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies 36 (10): 1123–1147.
Guasti, P. 2016. Development of citizen participation in Central and Eastern Europe after the EU enlargement and economic crises. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 49 (3): 219–231.
Hanley, S., and A. Sikk. 2016. Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in Eastern Europe. Party Politics 22 (4): 522–533.
Hellman, J.S. 1998. Winners take all: The politics of partial reform in postcommunist transitions. World Politics 50 (2): 203–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008091.
Heyes, A., and B. King. 2020. Understanding the organization of green activism: Sociological and economic perspectives. Organization & Environment 33 (1): 7–30.
Howard, M.D. 2003. The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ikstens, J., M. Pinto-Duschinsky, D. Smilov, and M. Walecki. 2002. Political finance in Central Eastern Europe: An interimreport. Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft 31 (1): 21–39.
Jahn, D. 2016. Changing of the guard: Trends in corporatist arrangements in 42 highly industrialized societies from 1960 to 2010. Socio-Economic Review 14 (1): 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu028.
Kerényi, S., and M. Szabó. 2006. Transnational influences on patterns of mobilisation within environmental movements in Hungary. Environmental Politics 15 (5): 803–820.
Kitschelt, H., Z. Mansfeldova, R. Markowski, and G. Tóka. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090397.
Klüver, H. 2012. Lobbying as a collective enterprise: Winners and losers of policy formulation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (3): 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.699661.
Korkut, U. 2005. The relationship between democratization and invigoration of civil society: The case of Hungary and Poland. East European Quarterly 2: 149–177.
Kostelka, F. 2014. The State of political participation in Post-communist democracies: Low but surprisingly little Biased Citizen engagement. Europe-Asia Studies 66 (6): 945–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.905386.
Labanino, R., Dobbins, M., Czarnecki, S. and Želenik, A. (2020) Explaining the formation rates of post-communist interest organizations: Density dependence and political opportunity structure. East European Politics and Society (online first).
Lewis, P.G. 2006. Party systems in post-communist Central Europe: Patterns of stability and consolidation. Democratization 13 (4): 562–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340600791863.
Linz, J. 1990. Transitions to democracy. The Washington Quarterly 13 (3): 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609009445400.
Mahoney, C. 2007. Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy 27 (1): 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X07000608.
Mansfeldová, Z., S. Nałęcz, E. Priller, and A. Zimmer. 2004. Civil society in transition: Civic engagement and nonprofit organizations in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989. In Future of civil society, ed. A. Zimmer and E. Priller. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
McAllister, I., and S. White. 2007. Political parties and democratic consolidation in post-communist societies. Party Politics 13 (2): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807073858.
McGrath, C. 2008. The development and regulation of lobbying in the new member states of the European Union. Journal of Public Affairs 8 (1): 15–32.
Molnár, V. (2020) Civil society in an illiberal democracy: Government-friendly NGOs, Foreign agents, and Uncivil Publics. In Kovács, J. M. and Trencsényi, B. (eds.): Brave New Hungary. Mapping The ystem of National Cooperation. London: Lexington Books, pp. 51–72.
Navratil, J., and A. Kluknavska. 2020. Civil society trajectories in CEE: Post-communist weakness or differences in DifficultTimes? Czech Journal of Political Science 2: 101–118.
Nelson, D. 1996. Civil society endangered. Social Research 63 (2): 345–368.
Nielsen, K., B. Jessop, and J. Hausner. 1995. Institutional change in post-socialism. In Strategic choice and path dependency in post-socialism: Institutional dynamics in the transformation process, ed. J. Hausner, B. Jessop, and K. Nielsen, 3–44. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Nölke, A., and A. Vliegenthart. 2009. Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics 61 (4): 670–702.
Novak, M., and D. Fink-Hafner. 2019. Slovenia: Interest group developments in a postsocialist-liberal democracy. Journal of Public Affairs 19: e1867. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1867.
Novak, M., and D. Lajh. 2018. The participation of Slovenian civil society organisations in EU policymaking: Explaining their different routes. Journal of Contemporary European Research 14 (2): 105–122. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v14i2.871.
Obradovic, D., and H. Pleines. 2007. The capacity of Central and East European interest groups to participate in EU governance. Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag.
Offe, C. 1991. ‘Capitalism by democratic design? Democratic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe. Social Research 58: 865–892.
Ost, D. 2011. Illusory corporatism ten years later. Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology 2 (3): 19–49.
Pleines, H. 2004. Social partners and captors. The role of non-state actors in economic policy-making in Eastern Europe. Romanian Journal of Political Science 4 (1): 51–65.
Pop-Eleches, G., and J. Tucker. 2013. Associated with the past? Communist legacies and civic participation in post-communist countries. East European Politics, Societies and Cultures 21 (1): 45–68.
Pospieszna, P., and A. Vetulani-Cęgiel. 2021. Polish Interest groups facing democratic backsliding. Interest Groups and Advocacy 10: 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-021-00119-y.
Putnam, R. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rakušanová, P. 2005. Civil society and civic participation in the Czech Republic. Sociologické Studie 5 (5): 1–58.
Ramet, S. 2010. Central and southeast European politics since 1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rasch, D. 2018. Lobbying success in the European Union. The Role of Information and Frames: Routledge.
Riedel, R. 2016. Ekonomia polityczna procesów prywatyzacyjnych w Europie Środkowo—Wschodniej. Studia Europejskie 2 (78): 111–126.
Roberts, A. 2009. The politics of healthcare reform in postcommunist Europe: The importance of access. Journal of Public Policy 29 (3): 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X09990110.
Rose, R. 2009. Understanding post-communist transformation: a bottom up approach. London, New York: Routledge.
Rozbicka, P., P. Kamiński, M. Novak, and V. Jankauskaitė. 2020. Achieving democracy through interest representation: Interest groups in central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Rozbicka, P. & Kaminski, P. (2021) Have they already emerged? Mapping the population of national interest organizations in the Post-Communist Poland. Europe Asia Studies (forthcoming).
Rueschemeyer, D., M. Rueschemeyer, and B. Wittrock, eds. 1998. Participation and Democracy, East and West: Comparisons and Interpretations. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Sata, R., and I.P. Karolewski. 2020. Caesarean politics in Hungary and Poland. East European Politics 36 (2): 206–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2019.1703694.
Schmitter, P.C. 1992. The consolidation of democracy and representation of social groups. American Behavioral Scientist 35 (4–5): 422–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276429203500406.
Šimral, V. 2015. The funding and oversight of Political Parties and Electoral Campaigns in Central and Eastern Europe. Prague: Frank Bold.
Stanojević, M. 2011. Social pacts in Slovenia: accommodation to the EMU regime and the Post-euro development. Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology 2 (3): 107–135.
Tarlea, S. 2017. Higher education governance in Central and Eastern Europe: A perspective on Hungary and Poland. European Educational Research Journal 16 (5): 670–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116677756.
Vráblíková, K. 2009. Politická participace a její determinanty v postkomunistických zemích. Sociologický Časopis 45 (5): 867–897.
Vráblíková, K. 2014. How context matters? mobilization, political opportunity structures, and nonelectoral political participation in old and New Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 47 (2): 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013488538.
Wallace, C., F. Pichler, and C. Haerpfer. 2012. Changing patterns of civil society in Europe and America 1995–2005: Is Eastern Europe different? East European Politics and Societies: ANd Cultures 26 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325411401380.
Wiesenthal, H. 1996. ‘Organized interests in contemporary East Central Europe: Theoretical perspectives and tentative hypotheses. In Parliaments and organized interest: The second steps, ed. A. Agh and G. Ilonszki, 40–58. Budapest: Hungarian Centre for Democracy Studies.
Zubek, R. 2005. Complying with transposition commitments in Poland: Collective dilemmas, core executive and legislative outcomes. West European Politics 28 (3): 592–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380500085855.
Zubek, R. 2011. Core executives and coordination of EU law transposition: Evidence from new member States. Public Administration 89 (2): 433–450.