Toward Optimal Calibration of the SLEUTH Land Use Change Model

Transactions in GIS - Tập 11 Số 1 - Trang 29-45 - 2007
Charles Dietzel1, Keith Clarke1
1Department of GeographyUniversity of California – Santa Barbara

Tóm tắt

AbstractSLEUTH is a computational simulation model that uses adaptive cellular automata to simulate the way cities grow and change their surrounding land uses. It has long been known that models are of most value when calibrated, and that using back‐casting (testing against known prior data) is an effective calibration method. SLEUTH's calibration uses the brute force method: every possible combination and permutation of its control parameters is tried, and the outcomes tested for their success at replicating prior data. Of the SLEUTH calibration approaches tried so far, there have been several suggested rules to follow during the brute force procedure to deal with problems of tractability, most of which leave out many of the possible parameter combinations. In this research, we instead attempt to create the complete set of possible outcomes with the goal of examining them to select the optimum from among the millions of possibilities. The self‐organizing map (SOM) was used as a data reduction method to pursue the isolation of the best parameter sets, and to indicate which of the existing 13 calibration metrics used in SLEUTH are necessary to arrive at the optimum. As a result, a new metric is proposed that will be of value in future SLEUTH applications. The new measure combines seven of the current measures, eight if land use is modeled, and is recommended as a way to make SLEUTH applications more directly comparable, and to give superior modeling and forecasting results.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1109/ICNN.1997.616230

Batty M, 1977, Urban Modelling

10.1080/02693799408902013

Candau J, 2000, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modeling: Problems, Prospects, and Needs for Research

10.1080/136588198241617

10.1068/b240247

Clarke K C, 2006, Classics from IJGIS: Twenty years of the International Journal of Geographical Information Science and Systems, 413

10.1111/j.1467-9671.2004.00197.x

10.1080/13658810410001713407

Esnard A M, 2002, Descriptive and comparative studies of 1990 urban extent data for the New York Metropolitan Region, URISA Journal, 14, 57

Goldstein N C, 2004, GeoDynamics, 00

10.1068/b2983

KaskiS1997Data Exploration Using Self‐organizing Maps.Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation Department of Computer Science and Engineering Helsinki Technical University

10.1007/978-3-642-97610-0

10.1068/b250795

10.1016/S0198-9715(03)00043-7

10.1080/01944367308977851

10.1080/01944369408975549

10.2307/213774

Pettit C, 2002, Planning Support Systems in Practice, 331

10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00014-X

Simula O, 1999, Neuro‐Fuzzy Techniques for Intelligent Information Systems, 3

10.1109/38.974518

Ultsch A, 2003, U‐matrix: A Tool to Visualize Clusters in High Dimensional Data.

10.1007/s00267-002-2630-x

Vesanto J, 1997, Data Mining Techniques Based on the Self‐organizing Map.

Vesanto J, 2002, Artificial Neural Networks., 951

10.1080/1365881031000086965