Topology optimization for coupled acoustic-structural systems under random excitation

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization - Tập 56 - Trang 809-822 - 2017
Linyuan Shang1, Guozhong Zhao1, Jingjuan Zhai1
1State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

Tóm tắt

Topology optimization for coupled acoustic-structural systems subjected to stationary random excitations is investigated. Bi-material elastic continuum structures without damping are considered. The finite element method is utilized to deal with coupled acoustic-structural problems. An accurate and highly efficient algorithm series for stationary random analysis techniques, pseudo excitation method, is extended to calculate the acoustic random response generated by the vibrating structures. Minimization of the auto power spectral density of sound pressure is taken as design objective and its sensitivities with respect to topological variables are derived by adjoint method. A penalty term is proposed to suppress the intermediate volumetric densities. Numerical examples are given to demonstrate the validity of the presented methods.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Akl W, El-Sabbagh A, Al-Mitani K, Baz A (2009) Topology optimization of a plate coupled with acoustic cavity. Int J Solids Struct 46:2060–2074 Allaire G, Kohn RV (1993) Topology optimization and optimal shape design using homogenization. Nato Adv Sci Inst Se 227:207–218 Chen G, Zhao GZ, Gu YX (2007) Sensitivity analysis and design optimization method for acoustic-structural coupled systems. J Vib Shock 26:86–89 (in Chinese) Clough RW, Penzien J, Griffin DS (1975) Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill, New York Craggs A (1971) The transient response of a coupled plate-acoustic system using plate and acoustic finite elements ☆. J Sound Vib 15:509–528 Davies HG (1971) Low frequency random excitation of water-loaded rectangular plates. J Sound Vib 15:107–126 Denli H, Sun JQ (2008) Structural–acoustic optimization of sandwich cylindrical shells for minimum interior sound transmission. J Sound Vib 316:32–49 Der Kiureghian A, Neuenhofer A (1995) Discussion of "seismic random-vibration analysis of Multisupport-structural systems". J Eng Mech 121 Du J, Olhoff N (2007) Minimization of sound radiation from vibrating bi-material structures using topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip O 33:305–321. doi:10.1007/s00158-006-0088-9 Du J, Olhoff N (2010) Topological design of vibrating structures with respect to optimum sound pressure characteristics in a surrounding acoustic medium. Struct Multidiscip O 42:43–54. doi:10.1007/s00158-009-0477-y Engelstad SP, Cunefare KA, Powell EA, Biesel V (2012) Stiffener shape design to minimize interior noise. J Aircr 37:165–171 Fritze D, Marburg S, Hardtke HJ (2005) FEM–BEM-coupling and structural–acoustic sensitivity analysis for shell geometries. Comput Struct 83:143–154 Gan RZ, Sun Q, Feng B, Wood MW (2006) Acoustic–structural coupled finite element analysis for sound transmission in human ear—pressure distributions. Med Eng Phys 28:395–404 Gea HC (1996) Topology optimization: a new microstructure-based design domain method. Comput Struct 61:781–788. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(96)00092-2 Heredia-Zavoni E, Vanmarcke EH (1994) Seismic random-vibration analysis of multisupport-structural systems. J Eng Mech 120:1107–1128 HerediaZavoni E, Vanmarcke EH (1995) Closure of "seismic random-vibration analysis of multisupport-structural systems". J Eng Mech 121:1037–1038 Kim NH, Dong J (2006) Shape sensitivity analysis of sequential structural-acoustic problems using FEM and BEM. J Sound Vib 290:192–208 Kiureghian AD, Neuenhofer A (1992) Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitation. Earthquake Eng Struc 21:713–740 Lee M-C, Penzien J (1983) Stochastic analysis of structures and piping systems subjected to stationary multiple support excitations. Earthquake Eng Struc 11:91–110 Li W, Chai Y, Lei M, Liu GR (2014) Analysis of coupled structural-acoustic problems based on the smoothed finite element method (S-FEM). Eng Anal Bound Elem 42:84–91 Lin J (1992) A fast CQC algorithm of PSD matrices for random seismic responses. Comput Struct 44:683–687 Lin J, Zhang W, Li J (1994) Structural responses to arbitrarily coherent stationary random excitations. Comput Struct 50:629–633 Lin J, Zhao Y, Zhang Y (2001) Accurate and highly efficient algorithms for structural stationary/non-stationary random responses. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:103–111 Lin YK, Zhang R, Yong Y (1990) Multiple supported pipeline under seismic wave excitations. J Eng Mech 116:1094–1108 Luo J, Gea HC (2003) Optimal stiffener design for interior sound reduction using a topology optimization based approach. J Vib Acoust 125:267–273 Ma ZD, Hagiwara I (1991a) Sensitivity analysis methods for coupled acoustic-structural systems part I: modal sensitivities. AIAA J 29:1787–1795 Ma ZD, Hagiwara I (1991b) Sensitivity analysis methods for coupled acoustic-structural systems part II: direct frequency response and its sensitivities. AIAA J 29:1796–1801 Marburg S (2002) A general concept for design modification of shell meshes in structural-acoustic optimization — Part I: formulation of the concept. Finite Elem Anal Des 38:725–735 Marburg S, Hardtke HJ (2002) A general concept for design modification of shell meshes in structural-acoustic optimization — Part II: application to a floor panel in sedan interior noise problems. Finite Elem Anal Des 38:737–754 Mathur GP, Chin CL (1996) Sound transmission through stiffened aircraft structures. In: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings Seattle, Washington, pp 199-204 Mixson JS, Wilby JF (1991) Interior noise. In: H.H. Hubbard (ed) Aeroacoustics of Flight Vehicles: Theory and Practice. Volume 2: Noise Control, pp 271–355 Nefske DJ, Jr JAW, Howell LJ (1982) Structural-acoustic finite element analysis of the automobile passenger compartment: a review of current practice. J Sound Vib 80:247–266 Puri RS, Morrey D (2010) A Krylov–Arnoldi reduced order modelling framework for efficient, fully coupled, structural–acoustic optimization. Struct Multidiscip O 43:495–517. doi:10.1007/s00158-010-0588-5 Shang L, Zhao G (2015) Optimality criteria-based topology optimization of a bi-material model for acoustic–structural coupled systems. Eng Optim 48:1–20 Smith DC, Bernhard RJ (1992) Computation of acoustic shape design sensitivity using a boundary element method. J Vib Acoust Stress Reliab Des 114:127–132 Sumitani K, Shinohara T (1995) Research on aerodynamic noise around automobiles. JSAE Rev 16:157–164 Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24:359–373 Yang RZ, Du JB (2013) Microstructural topology optimization with respect to sound power radiation. Struct Multidiscip O 47:191–206 Zhang J, Cheng GD, Zhao WZ, Zhao GZ (2009) Acoustic design optimization for vibration of cylinder container coupled with interior acoustic field. J Sound Vib 328:607–617 Zhao GZ, Chen G, Kang Z (2012) An iterative algorithm for analysis of coupled structural-acoustic systems subject to random excitations. Acta Mech Sinica 28:458–467