To Wean or Not to Wean: A Practical Patient Focused Guide to Ventilator Weaning

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine - Tập 37 Số 11 - Trang 1417-1425 - 2022
Padmastuti Akella1, Louis Voigt1, Sanjay Chawla1
1Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

Tóm tắt

Since the inception of critical care medicine and artificial ventilation, literature and research on weaning has transformed daily patient care in intensive care units (ICU). As our knowledge of mechanical ventilation (MV) improved, so did the need to study patient-ventilator interactions and weaning predictors. Randomized trials have evaluated the use of protocol-based weaning (vs. usual care) to study the duration of MV in ICUs, different techniques to conduct spontaneous breathing trials (SBT), and strategies to eventually extubate a patient whose initial SBT failed. Despite considerable milestones in the management of multiple diseases contributing to reversible respiratory failure, in the application of early rehabilitative interventions to preserve muscle integrity, and in ventilator technology that mitigates against ventilator injury and dyssynchrony, major barriers to successful liberation from MV persist. This review provides a broad encompassing view of weaning classification, causes of weaning failure, and evidence behind weaning predictors and weaning modes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s00134-006-0338-8

Ibsen B, 1954, The Anaesthetist’s Viewpoint on the Treatment of Respiratory Complications in Poliomyelitis During the Epidemic in Copenhagen, 1952, 10.1177/003591575404700120

10.1016/S0096-5588(20)30633-4

10.1097/00000542-197708000-00003

10.1097/00003246-197711000-00002

10.4187/respcare.02055

10.1186/cc660

10.4187/respcare.01895

10.1183/09031936.00010206

10.1186/cc9296

Doorduin J, 2013, Netherlands Journal of Critical Care, 17, 11

10.1016/j.medin.2017.11.010

10.1097/ACO.0000000000000297

10.1378/chest.107.1.204

10.1164/ajrccm.155.3.9117026

10.1164/ajrccm.155.3.9117025

10.1159/000488667

10.1164/rccm.201610-2076ST

10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.045

10.1186/s13613-019-0481-3

10.1007/s00134-014-3334-4

10.1186/s13089-020-00160-z

10.1186/s13054-020-03358-8

10.1164/rccm.201610-2075ST

10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036

10.1186/cc11378

10.1097/00000542-198808000-00004

10.1097/CCM.0000000000000295

10.1007/s00134-006-0339-7

10.1186/cc9326

10.1056/NEJMoa1301372

10.1016/j.cnc.2016.02.005

10.1007/s00134-020-06181-5

10.1007/s00134-016-4245-3

10.1097/CCE.0000000000000106

Dres M, 2020, Eur Respir J., 56, 4352

10.1164/rccm.200504-545OC

10.1016/S0012-3692(15)31311-8

10.1186/s43168-020-00013-2

10.1378/chest.120.6_suppl.375S

10.1056/NEJM199105233242101

Meade M, Chest, 120, 400S, 10.1378/chest.120.6_suppl.400S

10.1097/01.CCM.0000236546.98861.25

10.1164/ajrccm.150.4.7921460

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042619

10.1186/s13613-019-0611-y

10.1097/01.CCM.0000127263.54807.79

10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72

10.1001/jama.2012.304

10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70178-8

10.1001/jama.288.22.2859

10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cc4b53

10.1186/cc12557

10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.007

10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-586CME

10.1056/NEJM199502093320601

10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.053

10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.064

10.1001/jama.2021.2384

10.1001/jama.2021.1178

10.1056/NEJM199612193352502

10.1097/00003246-199704000-00004

10.1378/chest.118.2.459

10.1164/rccm.200306-761OC