To ‘Fall in Line’ or to ‘Grab’: Thoughts on the Indigenization of Political Science
Tóm tắt
The purpose of this paper is to present a theoretical and practical basis for the indigenization of political science in the context of China. In particular, it attempts to address the three related questions: Is it necessary to indigenize political science? Is it possible to indigenize political science? How should political science be indigenized? It argues that that indigenization is not an easy task even for indigenous academics. Therefore a project of indigenization requires a conscious and active effort on their part. Without critical introspection, indigenization is impossible.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Somit, A., and J. Tananhaus. 1982. The Development of American Political Science. New York: Irving Publishers.
Cao, Rixin. 1997. A probe into the categories of political science. In New theorems of political science: Western studies and the Chinese experience, ed. Ningshuo Zheng and Jin Luo. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Hirschman, Alberto. 1970. The search for paradigms as a hindrance to understanding. World Politics 22(3): 329–343.
Womack, John. 1968. Zapata and the Mexican Revolution. New York: Knopf.
James, James L. 1968. Payne, patterns of conflict in Colombia. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hirschman, Alberto. 1995. A propensity to self-subversion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pye, Lucian. 1990. China: Erratic state, frustrated society. Foreign Affairs 69(4): 56–74.
Friedman, Edward. 1994. Reconstructing China’s national identity: A Southern Alternative to Mao- Era Anti- Imperialist Nationalism. Journal of Asian Studies 53(1): 67–91.
Fellmeth, Aaron Xavier. 1996. Social capital in the United States and Taiwan: Trust or rule of law. Development Policy Review 14(2): 151–171.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies, 173. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Manabe, Kazufumi. 1995. Chinese Attitudes towards Technology and Environment : A Value Survey in China. Kwansei Gakuin Sociology Department studies, No. 73 (Oct. 1995): 25–49, Kwansei Gakuin University.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1999. Trust, well-being, and democracy. In Democracy and trust, ed. Mark E. Warren, 88–120. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Shaoguang. 2000. The basis of trust: An explanation of political society. Hong Kong Chinese University Political Science and Public Administration Department. (unpublished essay).
Uslaner, Eric M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Jie, Yang Zhong, and Jan Hillard. 1997. Assessing political support in China: Citizens’ evaluations of governmental effectiveness and legitimacy. Journal of Contemporary China 6(16): 551–566.
Chen, Jie, Yang, Zhong, and Jan W. Hillard. 1997. The level and sources of popular support for China’s current political regime. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30(1): 45–64.
Wei, Yunhan, and Zhang Youzong. 1998. Democracy in Chinese society and the cultural origin of the authoritarian system: Comparative politics in mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. In The transformation of chinese society: An analysis of societal indicators, ed. Liu Zhaojia, 257–285. Center for Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Shi, Tianjian. 2001. Cultural values and political trust: A comparison of the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. Comparative Politics 33(4): 401–419.
Tang, Wenfang. 2001. Political and social trends in the post-Deng urban China: Crisis or stability? The China Quarterly 168: 890–909.
Chen, Jie. 2004. Popular political support in Urban China. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Li, Lianjiang. 2004. Political trust in Rural China. Modern China 30(2): 228–258.
Wang, Zhengxu. 2005. Political trust in China: Forms and causes. In Legitimacy: Ambiguities of political success of failure in East and Southeast Asia, ed. Lynn White. Singapore: World Scientific.
Tang, Wenfang. 2005. Public opinion and political change in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fewsmith, Joseph. 2007. Assessing social stability on the Eve of the 17th Party Congress. China Leadership Monitor 20: 1–24.
Shi, Tianjian. 2008. China: Democratic values supporting an authoritarian system. In How East Asian View Democracy, ed. Yun-han Chu, Larry Diamond, Andrew J. Nathan, and Doh Chull Shin, 209–237. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gilley, Bruce. 2008. Legitimacy and institutional change: The case of China. Comparative Political Studies 41(3): 259–284.
Gilley, Bruce. 2009. The right to rule: How states win and lose legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Holbig, Heike, and Bruce, Gilley. “In Search of Legitimacy in Post-revolutionary China: Bringing Ideology and Governance Back In,” GIGA Working Papers, No 127 (March 2010), p. 6.
Torpey, John. 2000. The invention of the passport: Surveillance, citizenship, and the state. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, Robert D. 1997. Was democracy just a moment? The Atlantic Monthly (December, 1997): 55–80.
Kaplan, Robert D. 2000. The coming anarchy: Shattering the dream of the post-cold war. New York: Random House.
Bates, Robert H. 1997. Area studies and the discipline: A useful controversy? Political Science & Politics 30(2): 166–169.
Bates, Robert H. 1998. Analytic narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Green, Donald P., and Ian Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Johnson, Chalmers. 1997. Preconception vs. observation: On the contributions of rational choice theory and area studies to contemporary political science. Political Science and Politics 30(2): 170–174.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The west: Unique, not universal. Foreign Affairs 75(6): 28–46.
Almond, Gabriel A. 1977. Clouds, clocks, and the study of politics. World Politics 29(4): 489–522.
Carroll, Susan J., and Linda G. Zerilli. 1993. Feminist challenges to political science. In Political science: The state of the discipline II, ed. Ada W. Finifter, 55–76. Washington: American Political Science Association.
Taylor, Charles. 1992. In Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition, ed. Amy Gutmann. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Katznelson, Ira. 1997. The subtle politics of developing emergency: Political science as liberal guardianship. In The cold war & the university: Toward an intellectual history of the post-war years, ed. Andrew Schiffrin, 233–258. New York: The New Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1952. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Truman, David B. 1971. The governmental process: Political interests and public opinion, 2nd ed. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
Lowi, Theodore. 1992. The state in political study: How we become what we study. American Political Science Review 86: 1–7.
Said, Edward. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
McCloskey, Donald N. 1985. The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Fenton, William Nelson. 1946. Integration of geography and anthropology in army area study curricula. American Association of University Professors Bulletin 32: 706.
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. A critique of area studies from a West European perspective. In Political science and area studies: Rivals or partners, ed. Lucian W. Pye, 203. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1997. The unintended consequences of the cold war area studies. In The cold war & the university: Toward an intellectual history of the post-war years, ed. Andrew Schiffrin, 195–231. New York: The New Press.
Scheer, Robert. 1965. How the United States got involved in Vietnam, 33–38. Santa Barabara: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.
Howoritz, I.L. (ed.). 1967. The rise and fall of project Camelot. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bates, Robert. 1997. Area studies and the discipline: A useful controversy? Political Science and Politics 30(2): 166–169.
Almond, Gabriel S., and Laura Roselle. 1989. Model fitting in communism studies. In Politics and the soviet system, ed. Thomas Remington. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Tsou, Tang. 1969. Western concepts and China’s historical experience. World Politics 21: 655–691.
Harding, Harry. 1984. The study of chinese politics: Toward a third generation of scholarship. World Politics 36: 284–307.
Perry, Elizabeth J. 1994. Trends in the study of chinese politics: State-society relations. China Quarterly 139: 704–713.
Perry, Elizabeth. 1999. Partners at fifty: American China studies and the PRC. Washington: Paper for conference on “Trends in China watching”.
Lowi, Theodore. 1992. The state in political science: How we become what we study, presidential address published in American Political Science Review, 86(1):1–7.
Marx, Karl. The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1852/18th-brumaire/ch07.htm.
Chow, Gregory C. 1997. Challenges of China’s economic system for economic theory. The American Economic Review 87(2): 321–327.
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1996. Open the social sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian commission on the restructuring of the social sciences, 89. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Campbell, Angus. 1980. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lane, Robert. 1959. Political life: Why people get Involved in Politics. Glenco: The Free Press.
Greenstein, Fred. 1970. Children and politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five Nations. Boston: Little, Brown.
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Carroll, Susan J. 1989. The personal is political: The intersection of private lives and public roles among women and men in elective and appointive office. Women and Politics 9: 51–67.
Gyan Prakash. 1990. Writing post-orientalist histories of the third world: Perspectives from Indian historiography. Comparative Studies in Society and History 32(2): 383–408.
Spivak, Gayatri. 1995. Can the Subaltern Speak? In The post-colonial reader, ed. B.G. Ashcroft Griffiths and H. Tiffin, 12–13. New York: Routledge.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks (Trans. Q. Hoare & G.N.). Smith, London: Lawrence and Wishart, p. 324.