Timing of fluvial sedimentation in the Upper Rhine Graben since the Middle Pleistocene: constraints from quartz and feldspar luminescence dating

Boreas - Tập 47 Số 1 - Trang 256-270 - 2018
Yan Li1, Sumiko Tsukamoto1, Manfred Frechen1, Gerald Gabriel1
1Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics, Stilleweg 2, Hannover 30655, Germany

Tóm tắt

The Heidelberg Basin (HDB) hosts one of the thickest Quaternary sediment successions in central Europe. To establish a reliable Middle and Upper Pleistocene chronology for a recently drilled core from the depocentre of the Heidelberg Basin, we applied multiple luminescence dating approaches, including quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL), two feldspar post‐IR IRSL protocols using second IR stimulation temperatures of 225 °C (pIRIR225) and 290 °C (pIRIR290), and two fading correction models. Relatively high anomalous fading was observed for both the pIRIR225 and pIRIR290 signals, with mean fading rates of 2.13±0.27 and 2.08±0.49%/decade, respectively. Poor dose recovery behaviour of the pIRIR290 signal suggests that the pIRIR290 ages are not reliable. The comparison of two fading correction methods for the K‐feldspar ages indicates that the correction method proposed by Kars et al. (2008) Radiation Measurements 43, 786, yields reliable ages, whereas the dose‐rate correction method proposed by Lamothe et al. (2003) Radiation Measurements 37, 493, does not. A chronology for the HDB is established using the quartz ages and reliable fading corrected feldspar pIRIR225 ages. Our chronology shows that the sediments in the upper Mannheim Formation were deposited during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 4 (c. 70 ka), constrained by two quartz ages in the upper 20 m of the core. Four fading corrected pIRIR225 ages of c. 400 ka show that the upper Ludwigshafen Formation was deposited during MIS 12–11, correlated with the Elsterian‐Holsteinian stage. Two ages of 491±76 and 487±79 ka indicate that the Middle and Upper Ludwigshafen Formation were probably deposited during the Cromerian Complex. This luminescence chronology is consistent with palynological results. It also indicates that the IRRF ages reported earlier are probably underestimated due to anomalous fading.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2478/v10003-010-0025-1

10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00018-0

10.1016/0277-3791(94)90056-6

Buness H., 2008, The Heidelberg Basin drilling project: geophysical pre‐site surveys, Quaternary Science Journal, Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, 57, 338

10.1111/j.1502-3885.2012.00248.x

10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.02.007

10.1016/j.quageo.2007.05.003

10.1016/j.quageo.2006.05.028

10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.09.001

10.1016/j.quageo.2015.02.015

10.1016/j.quageo.2010.08.004

10.1016/S1350-4487(02)00170-1

Ellwanger D., 2012, Fotodokumentation und Schichtenverzeichnis der Forschungsbohrungen Heidelberg UniNord I und II, LGRB‐Informationen, 26, 25

Ellwanger D., 2005, The Heidelberg Drilling Project (Upper Rhine Graben, Germany), Quaternaire, 16, 193

Ellwanger D. Gabriel G. Hoselmann C. Weidenfeller M. Wielandt‐Schuster U.&Grimm M.2010:Mannheim‐Formation Litholex (Online database) 03. 11. 2010 ed.Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe Hannover.

Ellwanger D., 2008, Long sequence of quaternary rocks in the Heidelberg Basin Depocentre, Quaternary Science Journal, Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, 57, 316

Gabriel G., 2008, The Heidelberg Basin drilling project, Quaternary Science Journal, Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, 57, 253

10.1016/j.quaint.2012.10.044

Guérin G., 2011, Dose‐rate conversion factors: update, Ancient TL, 29, 5

10.1016/j.epsl.2015.04.032

J. Hahne D. Ellwanger T. Simon U. Wielandt‐Schuster 2009

Hoselmann C. Ellwanger D. Gabriel G. Weidenfeller M.&Wielandt‐Schuster U.2010:Viernheim‐Formation. Litholex (Online database) 03‐11‐2010 ed. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe Hannover.

10.1088/0953-8984/18/4/020

Huntley D. J., 1997, The K content of the K‐feldspars being measured in optical or in TL dating, Ancient TL, 15, 11

Huntley D. J., 2001, The Rb contents of the K‐feldspar grains being measured in optical dating, Ancient TL, 19, 43

10.1139/e01-013

10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.03.032

10.1016/j.quageo.2012.05.001

10.1016/j.quageo.2014.04.001

10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.01.021

10.1016/j.quageo.2016.01.004

Knipping M., 2004, Pollenanalytische Untersuchungen an einem mittelpleistozänen Interglazial bei Mannheim, Tübinger Geowissenschaftliche Arbeiten, 10, 199

10.1017/S0016774600024045

10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00016-7

10.1016/j.pgeola.2009.10.006

10.2478/s13386-011-0006-9

10.1016/j.quageo.2011.05.001

10.2478/s13386-013-0160-3

10.1111/j.1475-4754.1979.tb00241.x

10.1016/j.quaint.2015.03.037

10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X

10.1016/1350-4487(94)90086-8

10.1017/S0016774600024033

10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.01.004

10.1029/2001TC900022

10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.12.011

10.1016/j.quaint.2010.05.018

10.2478/s13386-011-0043-4

10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.06.002

Timar‐Gabor A., 2010, Optical dating of Romanian loess using fine‐grained quartz, Quaternary Geochronology, 5, 143, 10.1016/j.quageo.2009.03.003

10.1016/j.quageo.2016.08.004

10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a005911

Weidenfeller M., 2008, Correlation of Pleistocene sediments from boreholes in the Ludwigshafen area, western Heidelberg Basin, Quaternary Science Journal, Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart, 57, 270

Weidenfeller M. Ellwanger D. Gabriel G. Hoselmann C.&Wielandt‐Schuster U.2010:Ludwigshafen‐Formation Litholex (Online database) 02‐11‐2010 ed. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe Hannover.

10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.11.001