Time-integrated radiation risk metrics and interpopulation variability of survival

Alexander Ulanowski1, Nobuhiko Ban2, Kotaro Ozasa3, Werner Rühm4, Edward Semones5, Mark Shavers6, Ludovic Vaillant7
1International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA Laboratories, Friedensstrasse 1, A-2444 Seibersdorf, Austria
2Nuclear Regulation Authority, 1-9-9 Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-8450, Japan
3Health Management Center, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
4Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Oberschleißheim 85764, Germany
5NASA Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
6KBR Human Health and Performance, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
7Centre d’étude sur l’Evaluation de la Protection dans le domaine Nucléaire, 28 rue de la Redoute, 92260 Fontenay aux Roses, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Rühm W, Ban N, Chen J, Dobynde M, Durante M, El-Jaby S, et al. System of radiological protection: towards a consistent framework on earth and in space; 2023, this issue. Shavers M, Semones EJ, Tomi L, Chen J, Straube U, Komiyama T, et al. Space agency-specific standards for crew dose and risk assessment of ionizing radiation exposures for the International Space Station; 2023, this issue. Shavers M, Semones EJ, Shurshakov V, Sato T, Komiyama T, Tomi L, et al. Intercomparison of dose and risk to human spaceflight – example BLEO mission; 2023, this issue. Dietze, 2013, ICRP publication 123: assessment of radiation exposure of astronauts in space, Ann ICRP, 42, 1, 10.1016/j.icrp.2013.05.004 Lowe, 2022, Radiation dose rate effects: what is new and what is needed?, Radiat Environ Biophys, 61, 507, 10.1007/s00411-022-00996-0 International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 2007, The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103, Ann ICRP, 37 Harrison, 2021, ICRP publication 147: use of dose quantities in radiological protection, Ann ICRP, 50, 9, 10.1177/0146645320911864 Ulanowski, 2020, ProZES: the methodology and software tool for assessment of assigned share of radiation in probability of cancer occurrence, Radiat Environ Biophys, 59, 601, 10.1007/s00411-020-00866-7 Walsh, 2020, A new European cancer risk assessment tool for application after nuclear accidents, Radioprotection, 55, S95, 10.1051/radiopro/2020018 Burnham, 2002, Selection and multimodel inference Grant, 2017, Solid cancer incidence among the life span study of atomic bomb survivors: 1958–2009, Radiat Res, 187, 513, 10.1667/RR14492.1 Walsh, 2019, Risk bases can complement dose bases for implementing and optimising a radiological protection strategy in urgent and transition emergency phases, Radiat Environ Biophys, 58, 539, 10.1007/s00411-019-00809-x Hsu, 2013, The incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors: 1950–2001, Radiat Res, 179, 361, 10.1667/RR2892.1 RKI-GEKID. Krebs in Deutschland 2013/20Berl Robert-Koch-Inst 2017;88–91. Statistisches Bundesamt. Serbetafel 2013/20Ergebnisse aus der laufenden Berechnung von Periodensterbetafeln für Deutschland und die Bundesländer [Internet]. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2016 [cited 2023 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.statistischebibliothek.de/mir/receive/DEHeft_mods_00057037 Vaeth, 1990, Calculating excess lifetime risk in relative risk models, Environ Health Perspect, 87, 83, 10.1289/ehp.908783 Thomas, 1992, Definition and estimation of lifetime detriment from radiation exposures: principles and methods, Health Phys, 63, 259, 10.1097/00004032-199209000-00001 Kellerer, 2001, On the conversion of solid cancer excess relative risk into lifetime attributable risk, Radiat Environ Biophys, 40, 249, 10.1007/s004110100106 2008, Effects of ionizing radiation, united nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation (UNSCEAR) 2006 report, Volume I, Scientific Annexes A and B, United Nations Ulanowski, 2019, On prognostic estimates of radiation risk in medicine and radiation protection, Radiat Environ Biophys, 10.1007/s00411-019-00794-1 2020, Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation: UNSCEAR 2019 Report. Annex A: evaluation of selected health effects and interference of risk due to radiation exposure, United Nations Walsh, 2021, A bespoke health risk assessment methodology for the radiation protection of astronauts, Radiat Environ Biophys, 60, 213, 10.1007/s00411-021-00910-0 HMD. Human Mortality Database. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany), University of California, Berkeley (USA), and French Institute for Demographic Studies (France). [Internet]. [cited 2021 September 14]; Available from: https://www.mortality.org/ Sobol, 2001, Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates, Math Comput Simul, 55, 271, 10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6 Razavi, 2021, The future of sensitivity analysis: an essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support, Environ Model Softw, 137, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104954 Yashin, 2002, New age patterns of survival improvement in Sweden: do they characterize changes in individual aging?, Mech Ageing Dev, 123, 637, 10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00410-9 Goldstein, 2006, Relationships between period and cohort life expectancy: gaps and lags, Popul Stud, 60, 257, 10.1080/00324720600895876 Shkolnikov, 2011, Steep increase in best-practice cohort life expectancy, Popul Dev Rev, 37, 419, 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00428.x Leon, 2019, Trends in life expectancy and age-specific mortality in England and Wales, 1970–2016, in comparison with a set of 22 high-income countries: an analysis of vital statistics data, Lancet Public Health, 4, e575, 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30177-X United Nations. World population prospects 2019. Vol STESASE A424 Dep Econ Soc Aff Popul Div; 2019